Filter This View

  • TC Tech. LLC v. Sprint Corp.

    Publication Date: 2019-07-03
    Practice Area: Expert Witnesses | Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kelly E. Farnan and Katharine L. Mowery, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Lawrence J. Gotts, Saswat Mis-ra, Kevin L. Mallen and Gabriel S. Gross, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, New York, NY, and Menlo Park, CA; Stephanie N. Solomon, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY; David S. Benyacar and Daniel L. Reisner, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Shanti M. Katona and Christina M. Belitz, Polsinelli PC, Wilmington, DE; Robert Reckers, David Morehan, Christine A. Guas-tello, Jordan T. Bergsten, Colman D. McCarthy and Thomas M. Patton, Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP, Houston, TX and Kansas City, MO for defendants.
    Case Number: D68620

    The court granted several aspects of the parties' various motions to limit expert testimony where the experts did not tie their opinions to the facts of the case.

  • Anderson-Strange v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.

    Publication Date: 2019-07-03
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: Transportation
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David B. Anthony, Berger Harris LLP, Wilmington, DE; Sean A. Meluney, Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff
    for defendant: Lindsay M. Neinast and Alison N. Davis, Littler Mendelson P.C., Washington, DC for defendant.
    Case Number: D68614

    Gender discrimination, retaliation, and termination claims dismissed on summary judgment where plaintiff failed to demonstrate that employer's proffered reasons were pretextual.

  • Greene v. Parker

    Publication Date: 2019-07-03
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jermaine Greene, Wilmington, DE, pro se plaintiff
    for defendant: Joseph Clement Handlon, Deputy Attorney General, Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
    Case Number: D68616

    Dismissal of inmate's civil rights complaint warranted for failure to prosecute where plaintiff had taken no action in the case for over a year, had failed to advise the court of his transfers, failed to respond to the motion to dismiss, and appeared to lack a meritorious claim.

  • Lampkins v. Mitra QSR KNE, LLC

    Publication Date: 2019-06-26
    Practice Area: Employment Litigation
    Industry: Food and Beverage
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Patrick C. Gallagher and Raeann Warner, Jacobs & Crumplar, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.Patrick C. Gallagher and Raeann Warner, Jacobs & Crumplar, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Richard A. Barkasy, Daniel M. Pereira, Jo Bennett and Samantha Banks, Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis LLP, Wilming-ton, DE and Philadelphia, PA for defendant.
    Case Number: D68609

    In this employment discrimination case, plaintiff failed to establish the existence of a hostile work environment, so the court held defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

  • AgroFresh Inc. v. Essentiv LLC

    Publication Date: 2019-06-19
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Agriculture
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: D68598

    Stay of patent infringement case granted where Patent Trial and Appeals Board ruled that claims of a patent-in-suit were unpatentable and parties anticipated appeal of that decision, since resolution of that matter could result in simplification of the issues on trial.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Georgia Business Litigation 2024

    Authors: Robert C. Port

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • S.I.SV.EL. Societa Italiana Per Lo Sviluppo Dell' Elettronica S.P.A. v. Rhapsody Int'l Inc.

    Publication Date: 2019-06-19
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: E-Commerce
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Burke
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Timothy Devlin, Devlin Law Firm LLC, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: David E. Moore, Bindu A. Palapura and Stephanie E. O'Byrne, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE for defend-ants Rhapsody Int'l and Spotify USA Inc. Patrick Bageant, Hollystone Law, Boise, ID for defendant Rhapsody Int'l. Stefani E. Shanberg and Michael J. Guo, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA for defendant Spotify USA Inc.
    Case Number: D68605

    Defendants were not entitled to summary judgment, because genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether the patent involved an inventive concept.

  • Fahmy v. Phelps

    Publication Date: 2019-06-19
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Paul A. Fahmy, Smyrna, DE, pro se plaintiff
    for defendant: N/A
    Case Number: D68599

    Plaintiff inmate's §1983 claims dismissed where he was granted a disciplinary hearing on his charges and where plaintiff received medical treatment for his injuries, failing to identify any officials who were responsible for the alleged delay in treatment.

  • Rivera v. Roma

    Publication Date: 2019-06-05
    Practice Area: Motor Vehicle Torts
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bruce L. Hudson, Hudson & Castle Law, LLC, Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs
    for defendant: Daniel M. Young, Ward Greenberg Heller & Reidy LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant
    Case Number: D68587

    Genuine issues of material fact precluded summary judgment in this motor vehicle accident matter. Questions regarding com-parative negligence, assumption of risk and the reasonableness of the parties' conduct were all matters for the jury.

  • Hardwick v. Senato

    Publication Date: 2019-06-05
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel M. Silver, Hayley J. Reese and Alexandra M. Joyce, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff
    for defendant: Ryan P. Connell, Delaware Dep't of Justice, Wilmington, DE for defendants
    Case Number: D68586

    Factual issues precluded summary judgment on an inmate's claims regarding a religious diet and congregational worship, but the inmate failed to exhaust his administrative remedies on his claim involving religious objects.

  • Carter v. Richman

    Publication Date: 2019-06-05
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jermaine Layton Carter, Smyrna, DE, pro se plaintiff
    for defendant:
    Case Number: D68584

    Prison inmate's amended §1983 complaint dismissed as frivolous where it asserted claims against prison administrators in their official capacities without alleging direct personal involvement by those administrators and where it arose from the inmate's dissatisfaction with the prison grievance process.