Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
2,443 results for '* court:"COURT OF DELAWARE"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2018-12-05
Practice Area: Entertainment and Sports Law | Telecommunications
Industry: Entertainment and Leisure
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Charles J. Brown, III of Gellert Scali Busenkell & Brown, LLC, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: N/A
Case Number: D68377
Plaintiff was entitled to damages against a corporate entity for intercepting a cable transmission, but the court denied judgment against the individual defendants.
Publication Date: 2018-12-05
Practice Area: International Law
Industry: Consulting
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68378
Plaintiff's allegations did not support the court's exercise of jurisdiction over a foreign country, and plaintiff failed to state a claim against two U.S. companies with regard to extraterritorial human rights violations.
Publication Date: 2018-12-05
Practice Area: Constitutional Law | Judges
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joseph Clement Handlon, Deputy Attorney General, Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
for defendant: N/A
Case Number: D68380
Plaintiff's objections to the court's prior rulings were not a basis for recusal.
Publication Date: 2018-12-05
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: Health Care
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joshua Meyerhoff for defendant Nanticoke Memorial Hospital.
for defendant: N/A
Case Number: D68379
A pro se plaintiff lacked standing to bring claims for violations of federal criminal statutes, and his civil rights claims failed as a matter of law.
Publication Date: 2018-12-05
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Marvin S. Burroughs, pro se petitioner
for defendant: Kathryn Joy Garrison, Deputy Attorney General, Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE for respondents.
Case Number: D68376
Federal habeas petition dismissed where claim of ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel not cognizable where there was no constitutional right to counsel in collateral proceedings and where the petition was filed outside the limitations period.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Elizabeth J. Sher, Kerri E. Chewning
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2018-11-28
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Consumer Products | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: John W. Shaw, Karen E. Keller, and Nathan R. Hoeschen, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; William J. McCabe, Matthew J. Moffa, and Thomas V. Matthew, Perkins Coie LLP, New York, NY; Kyle R. Canavera, Perkins Coie LLP, San Diego, CA for plaintiffs
for defendant: Timothy Devlin and James Gorman, Devlin Law Firm LLC, Wilmington, DE; Jamie B. Beaber, Kfir B. Levy, James A. Fussell, III, Tiffany A. Miller, Baldine B. Paul, and Alison T. Gelsleichter, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC; Robert G. Pluta, Mayer Brown LLP, Chicago, IL for defendant.
Case Number: D68369
Patent-in-suit was not directed to patent-ineligible subject matter where it addressed technological improvements to enable camera with recording/play-back capabilities that consumed less power, rather than being directed to the general abstract idea of battery or resource conservation.
Publication Date: 2018-11-28
Practice Area: Deals and Transactions | Private Equity and Venture Capital
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Software
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Thynge
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68373
Defendants adequately alleged contract and breach of warranty counterclaims, but their tort counterclaims were not based on the violation of any independent legal duty.
Publication Date: 2018-11-21
Practice Area: Intellectual Property | Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan and Michael J. Farman of Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Morgan Chu, Ben Hattenbach, Amy E. Proctor, Dominik Slusarczyk and Charlotte J. Wen of Irell & Manella LLP, Boston, MA, attorneys for plaintiff
for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld and Jeremy A. Tigan of Morris, Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE Wil-liam F. Lee and Louis W. Tompros of Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Dorr LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Mark D. Selwyn and Amanda L Major of Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC, at-torneys for defendant.
Case Number: D68365
Plaintiff's forum choice was entitled to paramount consideration, and little overlap existed between this case and another pending patent matter between the same parties in another jurisdiction.
Publication Date: 2018-11-21
Practice Area: Corporate Entities | Private Equity and Venture Capital
Industry: Accounting | Agriculture
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel K. Hogan of Hogan McDaniel, Wilmington, DE, attorney for plaintiff.
for defendant: Patrick M. McGrory of Tighe & Cottrell, P.A., Wilmington, DE attorney for defendant.
Case Number: D68364
The court lacked personal jurisdiction over a foreign entity where the facts did not meet the requirements of the long-arm statute, and did not comport with due process.
Publication Date: 2018-11-21
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Civil Rights | Discovery
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: NA
for defendant: Barry M. Willoughby and Lauren E.M. Russell of Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for defendant.
Case Number: D68361
A pro se plaintiff failed to prosecute her case when she did not respond to discovery requests, failed to appear for her deposition, and did not seek an extension of time for discovery.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read