Filter This View

  • SurgiQuest v. Lexion Med., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-05-30
    Practice Area: Business Torts | Damages
    Industry: Biotechnology
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Sleet
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: D68165

    Substantial evidence supported the jury's verdict finding of unfair competition and its award of compensatory and punitive damages.

  • Hunter v. Metzger

    Publication Date: 2018-05-30
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Marion Peter Hunter, pro se petitioner
    for defendant: Brian L. Arban, Deputy Attorney General of the Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE, attorney for respondents.
    Case Number: D68158

    Habeas petition alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failure to move for dismissal of indictment for lack of evidentiary support dismissed where petitioner's guilty plea colloquy established his knowing and voluntary admission of guilty and acknowledgement of his understanding of the waiver of his constitutional rights.

  • TQ Delta, LLC v. Zyxel Communications, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-05-23
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Electronics
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Peter J. McAndrews, Paul W. McAndrews, David Prange for TQ Delta, LLC
    for defendant: Kenneth L. Dorsney, Scott Burnett Smith, Ross Barton and Garland T. Stephens for Adtran Inc. and Zyxel Communications Inc.
    Case Number: D68156

    This claim construction matter involved communication system patents relating to impulse noise management during initialization, packet retransmission and memory sharing.

  • Evans v. Johnson and Johnson Co.

    Publication Date: 2018-05-23
    Practice Area: Products Liability
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Augustus Hebrew Evans, Jr., James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, Smyrna, DE, pro se plaintiff
    for defendant: Todd C. Schlitz, Drinker Biddle & Reath, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Daniel J. Brown and Hayley J. Reese, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for defendants.
    Case Number: D68152

    In forma pauperis plaintiff's motion to produce discovery denied in part where plaintiff's inmate status precluded production of 1.5 million pages of documents, but limited production possible where plaintiff identified specific types of documents sought.

  • Valinge Innovation AB v. Halstead New England Corp.

    Publication Date: 2018-05-23
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Chemicals and Materials
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Adam W. Poff, Pilar G. Kraman, Laura Masurovsky, Sydney R. Kestle and Daniel C. Cooley for plaintiff
    for defendant: Denise S. Kraft, Brian A. Biggs, Nicholas G. Papastavros, Michael Strapp, Melissa Reinckens, Peter Maggiore and Aaron Fountain for defendants.
    Case Number: D68157

    The court's claim construction in this case related to technologies for manufacturing and installing flooring products.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Lawyers Guide to Formulas in Deal Documents and SEC Filings

    Authors: Carla Garrett, Hayden Trubitt

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Nexeon Ltd. v. EaglePicher Tech. LLC

    Publication Date: 2018-05-23
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Electronics
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Mary Matterer, Stephen R. Carden, Ann C. Palma and James V. Suggs for plaintiff
    for defendant: Thomas C. Grimm, Jeremy A. Tigan and Jennifer Hayes for defendants.
    Case Number: D68154

    The court engaged in claim construction of multiple terms associated with fabricating silicon-based fibers and particles for use in rechargeable lithium ion batteries.

  • Cohen v. Navarro

    Publication Date: 2018-05-23
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeffrey Cohen, FCI Hazelton, Bruceton Mills, WV, pro se plaintiff
    for defendant: N/A
    Case Number: D68151

    Younger abstention doctrine barred claims for fraud upon the court arising from pending state court receivership and liquidation proceeding.

  • Doe v. Dept. of Serv. for Children, Youth & Their Families

    Publication Date: 2018-05-16
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Civil Rights
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Weih Steven Chang, Hockessin, DE, pro se plaintiff
    for defendant: Rosamaria Tassone-DiNardo, City of Wilmington Law Department, Wilmington, DE; Ryan P. Connell, Department of Justice, State of Delaware, Wilmington, DE; Gary H. Kaplan and Art C. Aranilla, II, Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for defendants.
    Case Number: D68142

    Motion for relief from dismissal of action denied where asserted legal error, purported newly discovered evidence, and conclusory allegations of fraud could not form basis for relief.

  • Goddard Sys., Inc. v. Gondal

    Publication Date: 2018-05-02
    Practice Area: Contracts | Trademarks
    Industry: Education
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Burke
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Douglas E. McCann and Jeremy D. Anderson, Fish & Richardson, P.C., Wilmington, DE; Dean T. Fournaris, John M. Doroghazi, and Jacob A. Sand, Wiggin and Dana LLP, Philadelphia, PA, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: Gary E. Junge, Schmittinger & Rodriguez, P.A., Newark, DE; Christopher P. Coval, Fenningham, Dempster & Coval, LLP, Trevose, PA, attorneys for defendants.
    Case Number: D68119

    Preliminary injunction denied where plaintiff had not proven defendants likely breach of non-compete covenants would continue or could not be fully remedied through monetary damages.

  • Evonik Degussa GMBH v. Materia, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-05-02
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Chemicals and Materials
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Hillman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Eric James Evain, Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A., Wilmington, DE; R. Eric Hutz, Rudolph E. Hutz, and Ryan P. Cox, Reed Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld and Thomas C. Grimm, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for defendant.
    Case Number: D68118

    Jury verdict in favor of defendant on issue of willfulness proper where record contained sufficient evidence for jury to conclude defendant did not discover adverse nature of plaintiffs patent during the period of its infringement.