Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
2,443 results for '* court:"COURT OF DELAWARE"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2017-11-29
Practice Area: Civil Rights | Employment Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D67956
Plaintiff adequately stated a claim for racially-based employment discrimination against a federal agency, but his other counts did not meet the requirements of the Federal Tort Claim Act.
Publication Date: 2017-11-29
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David C. Weiss and Edmond Falgowski for plaintiff
for defendant: Edson A. Bostic and Tieffa N. Harper for defendant.
Case Number: D67955
A prison officials conduct in arranging and delivering contraband to an inmate in return for payment qualified as an official act for purposes of the conspiracy and extortion charges made against her.
Publication Date: 2017-11-29
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David E. Moore, Bindu A. Palapura, and Stephanie E. O'Byrne, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; John M. Desmarais, Jon T. Hohenthaner, Karim Z. Oussayef, Laurie N. Stempler, and Robert C. Harrits, Desmarais LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for plaintiff
for defendant: John G. Day and Andrew C. Mayo, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; J. David Hadden, Saina S. Shamilov, Phillip J. Haack, and Adam M. Lewin, Fenwick & West LLP, Mountain View, CA, attorneys for defendant.
Case Number: D67952
Patents-in-suit were not invalid due to being directed to patent-ineligible abstract ideas where the claims specifically described the architecture for improving the functionality of computer networks, rather than claiming data storage generally.
Publication Date: 2017-11-29
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Sleet
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D67950
Plaintiffs motion for leave to amend complaint to add new defendant and new claim against that defendant denied, where related existing claims had already been dismissed in favor of arbitration, new claim could have been asserted in separate action, and proceedings would be delayed as discovery had partially completed.
Publication Date: 2017-11-22
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Chad S.C. Stover, Regina S.E. Murphy, Robert C. Mattson, Eric W. Schweibenz, Frank J. West, Vincent K. Shier, Christopher Ricciuti and Katherine D. Cappaert for plaintiff
for defendant: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, Alyssa Caridis and Nicholas H. Lam for defendants.
Case Number: D67947
The court construed patent terms relating to the manufacture of automotive fuel tanks.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Michael P. Maslanka
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2017-11-22
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Karen Jacobs, Mark M. Supko, Kathryn L. Clune, Vincent J. Galluzzo and Jacob Z. Zambrzycki for plaintiff
for defendant: Steven L. Caponi, Alan L. Barry, Jason A. Engel, Benjamin E. Weed, Devon C. Beane and Katherine L. Hoffee for defendants.
Case Number: D67948
The court issued a claim construction order in this patent infringement matter relating to multiple aspects of train safety and control.
Publication Date: 2017-11-22
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: N/A
for defendant: Joseph Clement Handlon for defendants.
Case Number: D67946
An incarcerated plaintiff could not recover under 42 U.S.C. §1983 for wrongful incarceration because his con-viction was not reversed or otherwise invalidated.
Publication Date: 2017-11-08
Practice Area: Class Actions | Corporate Governance | Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Francis J. Murphy, Jr., Jonathan L. Parshall, Laurence D. Paskowitz, Deborah R. Gross and Roy Jacobs for plaintiffs
for defendant: John C. Cordrey, George T. Conway III, Bradley R. Wilson and Jordan L. Pietzsch for M&T Bank de-fendants; Kevin R. Shannon, Tracy Richelle High and Christen M. Martosella for Hudson Bank de-fendants.
Case Number: D67929
Plaintiffs in a class action suit failed to demonstrate that a proxy statement issued in connection with a merger transaction was misleading. Motion to dismiss granted, without prejudice.
Publication Date: 2017-11-08
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Electronics | Hardware
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Dennis James Butler, John David Simmons, Stephen E. Murray, Keith A. Jones, Aaron Robert Ettelman, Frederick Tecce and Bryon T. Wasserman for plaintiffs
for defendant: Robert W. Mallard, Clinton L. Conner, David Tseng and Paul T. Meiklejohn for Toshiba defendants; Benjamin J. Schladweiler, Nicholas D. Mozal, Dennies Varughese, John C. Rozendaal, Michael E. Jof-fre, Jonathan Turminaro, Daniel J. Bernard, William H. Milliken, Stephanie M. Nguyen, Zhiwei Zou, Jean Paul Y. Nagashima and Takaaki Nagashima for defendants Funai; Adam Wyatt Poff, Pilar, G. Kraman, Kevin B. Collins, Jared R. Frisch, David A. Garr, Christopher Higby, Jeffrey H. Lerner, Robert T. Halsam, Chang Sik Kim and Scott Schrader for intervenor.
Case Number: D67930
Defendants in this patent matter demonstrated no literal infringement by their semiconductor products.
Publication Date: 2017-11-08
Practice Area: Intellectual Property | Patent Litigation
Industry: Biotechnology
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kelly E. Farnan, Christine D. Haynes, James F. Hurst, Patricia A. Carson, Christopher T. Jagoe and Aa-ron D. Resetarits for plaintiff
for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Brian P. Egan, Michael A. Morin, David P. Frazier, Emily K. Sauter, Roger J. Chin and Michael R. Seringhaus for defendants.
Case Number: D67932
The court construed disputed terms in this patent infringement matter involving pharmaceuticals.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read