Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
804 results for '* court:"Delaware Supreme Court"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2020-04-01
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Industry: E-Commerce
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Valihura
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jason M. Leviton, Joel A. Fleming, Lauren Godles Milgroom and Amanda R. Crawford, Block & Leviton LLP, Boston, MA for plaintiff.
for defendant: William B. Chandler, III, Bradley D. Sorrels, Lindsay Kwoka Faccenda, Andrew D. Berni, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Wilmington, DE; Boris Feldman and David J. Berger. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Palo Alto, CA for defend-ants Lake, Anderson, Gurley, Hansen, McCollam, Wood, Ahuja, Carolan, Hastings, Hendricks, Hunt, Leff, Rothrock, Stitch Fix, Inc and Roku, Inc. Catherine G. Dearlove, Anthony M. Calvano and Tyre Tindall, Richards Layton & Finger, P.A., Wil-mington, DE; Michael T. Bongiorno, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, LLP, New York, NY; Timothy J. Perla, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, LLP, Boston, MA for defendants Salzberg, Bradley, Cool, Fox, Goodman, Hirshberg, Kelley and Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. Kurt M. Heyman, Melissa N. Donimirski and Aaron M. Nelson, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE.
Case Number: Valihura
Federal forum provisions contained in corporate charters that required actions arising under federal securities law to be filed in a federal court were facially valid. Reversed.
Publication Date: 2020-03-18
Practice Area: Occupational Safety and Health
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Valihura
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael I. Silverman and Adrienne McDonald, Silverman McDonald & Friedman, Wilmington, DE for claimant.
for defendant: John J. Klusman and Kenneth L. Wan, Tybout Redfearn & Pell, Wilmington, DE for employer.
Case Number: D68917
The court erred in affirming a finding by the Industrial Accident Board that claimant was not permanently impaired based on the outcome of a temporary disability proceeding. Reversed and remanded, because claimant was entitled to the opportunity to present his evidence at a permanent impairment hearing.
Publication Date: 2020-03-11
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Vaughn
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Patrick J. Boyer, MacElree Havrey, Ltd., Centreville, DE for appellant
for defendant: James P. Curran, Law Offices of James P. Curran, Jr., Newark, DE for appellee.
Case Number: D68904
"Contemplation of marriage" rule should not be extended to apply to premarital debts where rule was originally intended to apply to separate property that the parties intended to become marital property upon marriage.
Publication Date: 2020-03-04
Practice Area: Environmental Law
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Seitz
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ralph K. Durstein III, Department of Justice, Dover, DE for appellant.
for defendant: John W. Paradee, Daniel F. McAllister, Stephen A. Spence, and Brian V. DeMott, Baird Mandalas Brockstedt, LLC, Dover, DE for appellee.
Case Number: D68895
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control's cease and desist powers could order a property owner to remove an environmentally-contaminating pile of waste, where the mere presence of the pile constituted an environmental violation and therefore removal of the pile would be required to cease and desist the violation.
Publication Date: 2020-03-04
Practice Area: Legal Malpractice
Industry: Legal Services | Software
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Seitz
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Christopher H. Lee and Blake A. Bennett, Cooch and Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Timothy S. Perkins, Underwood Perkins, P.C., Dallas, TX; Jeremy C. Martin, Martin Appeals, PLLC, Dallas, TX for plaintiff.
for defendant: P. Clarkson Collins, Jr., Carl N. Kunz, III and Kathleen A. Murphy, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE; George M Kryder and Melissa L. James, Vinson & Elkins LLP, Dallas, TX for defendants.
Case Number: D68897
The statute of limitations in this legal malpractice claim began to run at the time the injury occurred, not when the damages were certain.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Charles F. Herring, JR, Jason M. Panzer, Leah Turner
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2020-02-12
Practice Area: Insurance Litigation
Industry: Insurance
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Traynor
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeffrey A. Young, Young & McNelis, Dover, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Benjamin C. Wetzel, III, Wetzel & Assoc., P.A., Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D68877
Whether an assault was an "accident" under an insurance policy was determined by the intent of the insured, not by the viewpoint of the victim.
Publication Date: 2020-02-12
Practice Area: Business Torts
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Seitz
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ryan P. Newell and Lauren P. DeLuca, Connolly Gallagher LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Rudolf Koch, Robert L. Burns and Nicole K. Pedi, Richards, Layton & Finger P.A., Wilmington, DE; William Trach, Latham & Watkins LLP, Boston, MA for defendant.
Case Number: D68873
Plaintiff alleged its fraud claims with sufficient particularity, and the allegations suggested that defendant's representations were made with knowledge of their falsity, rather than being mere opinion or puffery.
Publication Date: 2020-02-12
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Valihura
Attorneys: For plaintiff: R. Craig Martin and Kelly L. Freund, DLA Piper LLP, Wilmington, DE for appellants.
for defendant: John P. DiTomo, Ryan D. Stottmann, and Coleen W. Hill, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE for appellees.
Case Number: D68872
Chancery court erred in applying foreign law when defendants failed to meet their burden to establish the law, and thus erred in ruling that a forum clause was mandatory rather than permissive, since the clause was permissive under the applicable Delaware law.
Publication Date: 2020-01-29
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Valihura
Attorneys: For plaintiff: William M. Lafferty, D. McKinley Measley, and Thomas P. Will, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Tariq Mundiya, Sameer Advani, Alexander L. Cheney, and Brittany M. Wagonheim, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, New York, NY for appellants.
for defendant: Carmella P. Keener, Rosenthal, Monhait & Goddess, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Carol S. Shahmoon and Gregory E. Keller, Shahmoon Keller PLLC, New York, NY for appellee.
Case Number: D68855
Stockholder presenting dissident slate of board nominees was not entitled to injunctive relief where, although trusts' requests for additional information was overbroad, the stockholder's failure to timely respond as required by the bylaws precluded its entitlement to relief.
Publication Date: 2020-01-29
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Transportation
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Seitz
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael J. Barry, John C. Kairis and Kimberly A. Evans, Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Wilmington, DE; Jeffrey Reeves, Atlanta, GA for plaintiff.
for defendant: R. Judson Scaggs, Jr., Susan W. Waesco and Sabrina M. Hendershot, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Susan S. Muck, Kevin P. Muck and Marie C. Bafus, Fenwick & West LLP, San Francisco, CA for defendants Camp, Graves, Huffington, Al-Rumayyan, Gurley and Bonderman. Donald J. Wolfe, Jr., T. Brad Davey, J. Matthew Belger and Jacob R. Kirkham of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Joseph G. Petrosinelli and Kenneth J. Brown, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC for defendant Kalanick. A. Thompson Bayliss and Michael A. Barlow, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Mark Gimbel, C. William Phillips and Bryant Pulsipher, Covington & Burling, LLP, New York, NY and San Francisco, CA for nominal defendant Uber Tech., Inc.
Case Number: D68860
The majority of a corporation's board of directors was disinterested in a transaction, so the court properly dismissed this matter due to the stockholder's failure to make a demand on the board prior to filing this litigation.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read