Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
1,779 results for '* court:"Delaware superior court"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2019-12-04
Practice Area: Tax
Industry: Education | State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Johnston
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David A. White, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: David H. Williams, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: D68792
School district's decision not to grant school tax refund to entity afforded charitable tax exemption affirmed where voluntary payment of tax pending appeal meant there was no unconstitutional taking and where statutory scheme governing refund did not violate due process.
Publication Date: 2019-12-04
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Corporate Entities
Industry: Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Adams
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Josiah R. Wolcott, Connolly Gallagher, LLP, Newark, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Chad S.C. Stover, Barnes & Thornburg, LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D68796
A factual dispute existed regarding whether a party was an agent or otherwise had authority to terminate an agreement. Motion for summary judgment denied.
Publication Date: 2019-12-04
Practice Area: Administrative Law
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Stokes
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gloria J. Leonard, Dagsboro, DE, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: Daniel C. Mulveny of the Dep’t of Justice, Wilmington, DE for the Unemployment Ins. Appeal Bd. Alan D. Albert, Wilming-ton, DE for RKB Funerals. Victoria W. Counihan, Wilmington, DE for the Dep’t of Labor.
Case Number: D68794
Employee voluntarily terminated her employment without good cause, so she was not entitled to receive unemployment bene-fits. Affirmed.
Publication Date: 2019-12-04
Practice Area: Medical Malpractice
Industry: Health Care
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Primos
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stacia Vick and Chadwick Vick, pro se plaintiffs.
for defendant: Thomas J. Marcoz, Jr. and Catherine M. Cramer, Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin for defendants.
Case Number: D68797
The court granted a motion in limine to preclude unsupported expert testimony regarding causation, but it denied other motions in limine, and deferred a ruling regarding the spousal privilege.
Publication Date: 2019-12-04
Practice Area: Regulation
Industry: Construction | Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Stokes
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ronald E. Hastings, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: Michael R. Smith, Seaford, DE for defendants.
Case Number: D68793
Although plaintiff alleged sufficient facts to support his fraud claims, the court held those claims were barred by the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel. Motion to dismiss granted.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Thomas P. Scrivo, Steven H. Sholk, Gibbons P.C.
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2019-11-27
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Karsnitz
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joseph J. Rolla, Lewes, DE, Janice Allmaras, Lewes, DE, Robert Viscount, Lewes, DE, pro se petitioners
for defendant: James P. Sharp, Moore & Rutt, P.A., Georgetown, DE for respondent.
Case Number: D68782
Petitioners were not entitled to use relation-back doctrine to bring amended land use complaint naming the landowner as a respondent within the 30-day deadline for appeal of the land use decision where the court rule required there be a mistake as to the identity of the correct party and there was no mistake in the present case over the landowner's identity.
Publication Date: 2019-11-27
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Agriculture | Food and Beverage
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Rocanelli
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Andrew C. Dalton, Dalton & Associates, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Scott M. Hendler, Hendler Flores, PLLC, Austin, TX for plaintiff.
for defendant: Somers S. Price, Jr., Potter, Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andrea Neuman and Thomas Manakides, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, New York, NY; Adam Orlacchio and Brandon McCune, Blank Rome LLP, Wilmington, DE; Donald E. Reid, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael L. Brem, Shirrmeister, Diaz-Arrastia, Brem, LLP, Houston, TX; Timothy Jay Houseal, Jennifer M. Kinkus, and William E. Gamgort, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; John C. Phillips, Phillips, Goldman, McLaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Kelly E. Farnan and Katharine L. Mowery, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; James Semple, Cooch & Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D68783
Motion to vacate due to intervening legal decisions denied where plaintiffs unreasonably delayed filing their motion and where decisions cited in support of motion were non-controlling law.
Publication Date: 2019-11-20
Practice Area: Damages
Industry: Construction | Real Estate
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Rocanelli
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Christopher H. Lee, Blake Bennett, and Dean Roland, Cooch & Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Justin Callaway, Salmon, Ricchezza, Singer & Turchi, LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D68775
Contractual limitation of liability provision that merely limited contractor's liability to cost of services, rather than excluding all liability, was enforceable since it provided certainty to potential damages.
Publication Date: 2019-11-20
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: Biotechnology
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Adams
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Vanessa L. Naisha, pro se plaintiff
for defendant: Smyrna, DE. Brian C. Ralston and Carla M. Jones, Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D68776
Pro se plaintiff not entitled to appointment of counsel for her civil case where there was no evidence plaintiff's access to the courts would be restricted absent appointed counsel and where plaintiff's diminished chance of success did not outweigh the government's interests.
Publication Date: 2019-11-20
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68781
The indemnification provision in the parties' merger agreement did not apply to attorney fees in first-party claims, so the court denied plaintiff's request for an award of attorney fees and expenses.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read