Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
79 results for '* industry:"Chemicals and Materials"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-10-15
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Construction | Energy
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael J. Joyce, Joyce, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Alicia M. Bendana, Jennifer E. Berriere, Coleman L. Torrans, Lugenbuhl, Wheaton, Peck, Rankin & Hubbard, New Orleans, LA for appellant.
for defendant: Eric M. Sutty, Armstrong Tisdale, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Miles C. Thomas, Miles Thomas Law, LLC, New Orleans, LA for appellee.
Case Number: 21-11226 (CTG)
Bankruptcy court erred in ruling that liquidating trustee could not bring claims against debtor's former parent where liquidating plan allowed trust to pursue claims against "executives," and parent qualified as such as debtor's sole member and manager.
Publication Date: 2024-09-10
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Investments and Investment Advisory | Manufacturing
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas E. Hanson, Jr., William J. Burton, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Blake Rohrbacher, Matthew W. Murphy, Sandy Xu, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: 2018-0729-SG
Court declined summary judgment dismissal of fraud claims where allegations of withholding of material information could support equitable tolling and plaintiffs plausibly alleged defendants' motive to fraudulently induce plaintiffs' investment.
Publication Date: 2024-08-27
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Adams
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Lisa C. McLaughlin, Phillips, McLaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE; John N. Scholnick, Ross, LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Lori Sambol Brody, Ellis George LLP, Los Angeles, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Chad S. C. Stover, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Wilmington, DE; Matthew B. Barr, Zachary Miller, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Indianapolis, IN for defendants.
Case Number: N17C-11-242 MAA CCLD
Failure to issue litigation hold following filing of counterclaim constituted reckless behavior warranting adverse inference after material, relevant information was deleted per automatic deletion protocols.
Publication Date: 2024-07-30
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen B. Brauerman, Emily L. Skaug, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Joelle E. Polesky, Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Patrick K. Kingsley, Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP, Philadelphia, PA for defendant.
Case Number: N23C-08-096 EMD CCLD
Express terms of parties' supply agreement released supplier from having to honor rates under the agreement after its termination, and the agreement merely allowed purchaser to apply credits it had earned to future contracts negotiated between the parties.
Publication Date: 2024-07-16
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Adams
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stamatios Stamoulis, Richard C. Weinblatt, Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC, Wilmington, DE; Richard A. Schwartz, Ross LLP, Los Angeles, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: John P. DiTomo, Alec F. Hoeschel, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Brian J. Massengill, Matthew E. Fenn, Mayer Brown LLP, Chicago, IL for defendant.
Case Number: N23C-08-206 MAA CCLD
Claims connected to the process of calculation and payment fell within scope of parties' limited arbitration clause covering the calculation of payment for acquired company following post-closing true-up.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-07-16
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Biotechnology | Chemicals and Materials | Software
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Cook
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Tiffany Geyer Lydon, Philip Trainer, Jr., Ashby & Geddes, P.A. Wilmington, DE; Lisa C. Solbakken, Arkin Solbakken LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Steven L. Becton, II, David J. Margules, Jessica C. Watt, Ballard Spahr LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: 2022-0876-NAC
Under the right-of-control test, plaintiff qualified as employee of defendant's subsidiary rather than defendant where subsidiary controlled plaintiff's compensation, determined the terms and conditions of his employment, and supervised his work.
Publication Date: 2024-03-18
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Energy | Manufacturing
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Paul D. Brown, Joseph B. Cicero, Chipman Brown Cicero & Cole, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Janet A. Hendrick, Michele C. Spillman, Angela M. Buchanan, Phillips Murrah P.C., Dallas, TX for plaintiffs.
for defendant: P. Clarkson Collins, Jr., K. Tyler O’Connell, Kirsten Zeberkiewicz, Morris James, Wilmington, DE; Sean D. Walsh, Scott R. Schillings, Matthew K. Holcomb, Hinkle Law Firm, Wichita, KS for defendants.
Case Number: 2021-0659-SG
Contractual limitations period rendered breach of asset purchase agreement facially untimely, and there were no allegations of misconduct by defendants that would warrant tolling the limitation period.
Publication Date: 2024-03-11
Practice Area: Insurance Law
Industry: Agriculture | Chemicals and Materials | Insurance
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Traynor
Attorneys: For plaintiff: John D. Balaguer, Lindsey E. Imbrogno, Balaguer Milewski & Imbrogno, Wilmington, DE; Michael M. Marick, Timothy H. Wright, Skarzynski Marick & Black LLP, attorneys for appellants
for defendant: Stephen E. Jenkins, Catherine A. Gaul, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Dorthea W. Regal, Joshua L. Blosveren, Miriam J. Manber, Hoguet Newman Regal & Kenney, LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for appellee.
Case Number: 135, 2023
Communications threating litigation at some indefinite time in the future without identifying claimants or requesting monetary relief were insufficient to constitute a "claim for damages" that would trigger or bar liability insurance coverage.
Publication Date: 2024-02-05
Practice Area: Mass Torts
Industry: Agriculture | Chemicals and Materials | Food and Beverage
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Andrew C. Dalton, Dalton & Associates P.A., Wilmington, DE; Scott M. Hendler, Hendler Flores Law, Austin, TX for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Jennifer C. Wasson, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Ryan D. Stottmann, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Adam V. Orlacchio, Blank Rome LLP, Wilmington, DE; Kelly E. Farnan, Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, DE; John C. Phillips, Jr., Phillips Goldman & Spence P.A., Wilmington, DE; Andrea E. Neuman, Mary Beth Maloney, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York, NY; William E. Thomson, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Michael L. Brem, Schirrmeister Diaz-Arrastia Brem LLP, Houston, TX for defendants.
Case Number: 12-695-RGA
Court declined to grant summary judgment for defendants where the parties' joint expert persuasively opined that plaintiffs' complaint qualified as a protective action under relevant Ecuadoran law, making plaintiffs' claims not time-barred under the Delaware borrowing statute.
Publication Date: 2023-09-11
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Energy
Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Judge: Judge Goldblatt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 16-11501 (CTG)
Creditor's cross-motion for leave to file an amended proof of claim denied where, once the bar date for filing proof of claims has passed, a proof of claim typically cannot be amended to add claims that were not included within the scope of the original proof of claim that did not put the debtor and other interested parties on notice of the extent of the amended claim.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read