Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
133 results for '* industry:"Legal Services"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2019-01-02
Practice Area: Legal Ethics and Attorney Discipline
Industry: Legal Services | Retail
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen L. Caponi and Matthew B. Goeller, K&L Gates LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Richard M. Beck and Sean M. Brennecke, Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP, Wilmington, DE; Clifford A. Wolff, Wolff Law, Fort Lauderdale, FL; David K. Stein, Bricker & Eckler, Columbus, OH for defendants.
Case Number: D68408
Pro hac vice admission terminated and sanctions imposed where counsel's conduct demonstrated a settled intent to intimidate deposition witnesses and harass opposing counsel, reflecting conduct unbecoming an attorney.
Publication Date: 2018-11-14
Practice Area: Class Actions | Securities Litigation
Industry: Automotive | Legal Services | Retail
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan and Michael J. Farnan of Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Phillip Kim of The Rosen Law Firm, P.A., New York, NY; Peter B. Andrews, Craig J. Springer and David M. Sborz of Andrews & Springer LLC, Wilmington, DE; Ira M. Press, David A. Bishop and Thomas E. Elrod of Kirby Mcinerney LLP, New York, NY; Jeffrey M. Gorris and Christopher P. Quinn of Friedlander & Gorris, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Danielle S. Myers of Robbins, Geller, Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, CA; P. Bradford deLeeuw of Rosenthal, Monhait & Goddess, P.A.; Naumon A. Amjed, Darren J. Check and Ryan T. Degnan of Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP, Radnor, PA, attorneys for plaintiffs
for defendant: Samuel A. Nolen and Katharine L. Mowrey of Richards Layton & Finger, P.A.; Douglas P. Baumstein and Susan L. Grace of White & Case LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for defendants.
Case Number: D68351
Institutional investor with largest financial interest in putative securities fraud class action was entitled to presumption as lead plaintiff despite falling afoul of the 5-in-3 Rule due to the statutory preference for institutional investors serving as lead plaintiffs in securities class actions.
Publication Date: 2018-11-07
Practice Area: Damages | Fee Disputes
Industry: Legal Services
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kathleen M. Miller, Robert K. Beste, III, Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for plaintiff
for defendant: Paul D. Brown, Joseph B. Cicero, Chipman Brown Cicero & Cole, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Mark A. Castillo, Curtis Castillo PC, Dallas, TX, attorneys for defendants.
Case Number: D68344
Remand granted where face of plaintiffs' complaint failed to give rise to any federal cause of action and where defendants' potential defenses under federal law were ineligible to create federal question jurisdiction.
Publication Date: 2018-08-01
Practice Area: Contracts | Legal Malpractice
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Legal Services | Real Estate
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Primos
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68235
The court denied motions for judgment on the pleadings with regard to two legal malpractice claims involving the improper titling of investment properties, because the complaint adequately alleged matters relating to standing and damages.
Publication Date: 2018-05-30
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Legal Services
Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Judge: Judge Walrath
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ronald S. Gellert, Joseph L. Steinfeld, Kara E. Casteel, Bethany J. Rubis and Edward E. Neiger for RCS Creditor Trust
for defendant: Adam G. Landis, James S. Green, Jr. and Michael L. Cook, for Schulte Roth & Zabel.
Case Number: D68162
After weighing the factors regarding transfer of this proceeding for avoidance of pre-petition transfers, the court concluded that the case should remain in the district where the underlying bankruptcy case was filed.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Shari L. Klevens, Alanna G. Clair
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2018-05-02
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Legal Services
Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Judge: Judge Sontchi
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Mark M Billion and Erin J. Kennedy for plaintiff
for defendant: Marcos A. Ramos and Joseph Barsalona II for defendant.
Case Number: D68123
Bankruptcy trustee was precluded from amending a complaint where the parties had previously entered a stipulated dismissal of the subject claims, and revival prejudiced defendant.
Publication Date: 2018-04-25
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Legal Services
Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Judge: Judge Sontchi
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Mark M Billion and Erin J. Kennedy for plaintiff
for defendant: Marcos A. Ramos and Joseph Barsalona II for defendant.
Case Number: D68123
Bankruptcy trustee was precluded from amending a complaint where the parties had previously entered a stipulated dismissal of the subject claims, and revival prejudiced defendant.
Publication Date: 2018-03-21
Practice Area: Legal Ethics and Attorney Discipline
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Wharton
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard L. Abbott, Abbott Law Firm, Hockessin, DE, pro se plaintiff;
for defendant: Deborah L. Moreau, Delaware State Public Integrity Commission, Dover, DE, attorney for defendant.
Case Number: D68078
Public Integrity Commission correctly declined to exercise jurisdiction over attorney employee of Office of Disciplinary Counsel where regulation of legal profession was expressly reserved to the Delaware Supreme Court.
Publication Date: 2018-01-17
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Discovery
Industry: Legal Services
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Laura Davis Jones, James E. O'Neill, Ali M.M. Mojdehi and Janet Dean Gertz for plaintiff
for defendant: James W. Semple, Paula J. Quillin and Joseph R. Farris for defendants.
Case Number: D68011
Attorneys who formerly engaged in joint representation were not allowed to withhold documents based on a non-party joint clients objection to disclosure, and the attorney-client privilege did not apply to communications relevant to the matter of common interest for which they were retained as joint attorneys.
Publication Date: 2017-12-27
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Laster
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeremy D. Anderson for plaintiff
for defendant: Douglas D. Hermann and James H.S. Levine for defendants.
Case Number: D67987
The court found that a foundation was a party that should be joined for just resolution of a dispute.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read