Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
281 results for '* industry:"State and Local Government"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2020-12-16
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Adam J. Waskie, Andrea Brooks, David E. Wilks, Wilks Law, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Julie M. O’Dell, Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins, LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Rebecca Song, Delaware Dep’t of Justice, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D69229
A prison official did not meet his burden of demonstrating that an inmate failed to exhaust his administra-tive remedies, so the court denied summary judgment.
Publication Date: 2020-12-09
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Paul J. Lockwood and Stefania A. Rosca, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: George T. Lees III, Delaware Dep’t of Justice, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: D69221
State law did not provide a private right of action for alleged violations of the state's constitution, so the court dismissed those claims but denied the other aspects of the motion to dismiss.
Publication Date: 2020-12-02
Practice Area: Administrative Law
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Primos
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Francis G. X. Pileggi, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jamie L. Inferrera, Eckert Seamens Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh, PA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Devera B. Scott, Deputy Attorney General, Department of Justice, Dover, DE; Kayli H. Spialter, Deputy Attorney General, Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: D69207
State erred in issuing restrictions on permissible rifles for hunting where statutory law did not include such restrictions and the state failed to comply with the APA in issuing what constituted a de facto regulation.
Publication Date: 2020-11-25
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Construction | State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Streett
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Paul A. Logan for plaintiff.
for defendant: Max B. Walton for defendant.
Case Number: D69199
Motion for sanctions and contractual indemnification denied where there was no evidence of vexatious or harassing litigation conduct and moving party failed to follow contractual obligation to submit a demand for indemnification.
Publication Date: 2020-11-11
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michele D. Allen, Allen & Associates, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Mary A. Jacobson, Laura Thomas Hey, New Castle County Office of Law, New Castle, DE for defendants.
Case Number: D69182
Americans with Disabilities Act claim failed where employee did not meet standard of "qualified individual" as request for leave without information on expected progress of treatment or anticipated date of return constituted a request for open-ended leave that was an unreasonable request for accommodation.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Michael D. Malfitano
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2020-11-11
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Shwartz
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D69183
District court erred in granting summary judgment to defendants by focusing on decedent's vulnerability to suicide, rather than his serious medical need as alleged in plaintiffs' claim.
Publication Date: 2020-11-11
Practice Area: Government
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | State and Local Government
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Melanie K. Sharp, Martin S. Lessner, Mary F. Dugan, Michael A. Laukaitis, II, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Steven S. Rosenthal, Tiffany R. Moseley, John David Taliaferro, Loeb & Loeb LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiff.
for defendant: Michael P. Kelly, David A. White, Matthew J. Rifino, McCarter & English LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jameel S. Turner, James G. Ryan, Bailey Cavalieri LLC, Columbus, OH for defendant.
Case Number: D69188
An administrative subpoena was not overly broad and was allowed under the state's revised escheat law.
Publication Date: 2020-11-04
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Peter L. Frattarelli, Kevin F. Shaw, Archer & Grenier, P.C., Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Stephen M. Ferguson, Kenneth L. Wan, Delaware Dep’t of Justice, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: D69179
Plaintiffs adequately alleged certain claims for personal liability against officials at a detention facility.
Publication Date: 2020-10-28
Practice Area: Election and Political Law
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David M. Fry, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; Karen Lantz, ACLU of Delaware, Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Aaron R. Goldstein, Ilona M. Kirshon, Allison J. McCowan, Frank N. Broujos, Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE; Max B. Walton, Matthew F. Boyer, Trisha W. Hall, Connolly Gallagher LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D69168
Where Election Day deadline for receipt of mailed-in ballots was previously constitutional, and where alleged efforts by the U.S.
Publication Date: 2020-10-21
Practice Area: Litigation
Industry: Construction | Legal Services | State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Streett
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Paul A. Logan for plaintiff.
for defendant: Max B. Walton for defendant.
Case Number: D69160
Reargument on motion to dismiss declaratory judgment suit denied where plaintiff asserted no new facts or law to change the court's determination that the parties' settlement agreement did not obligate defendant to cooperate in plaintiff's separate action against defendant's counsel.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read