Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
280 results for '* judge:"Andrews"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-05-06
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Trina M. Stanford, Wilmington, DE, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-663-RGA
Court sua sponte dismissed employment discrimination claims due to insufficient allegations regarding employment status and exhaustion of administrative remedies.
Publication Date: 2024-05-06
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sharon M. James, Wilmington, DE, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-914-RGA
Court sua sponte dismissed civil rights complaint upon screening where defendants were entitled to judicial immunity and plaintiff's allegations did not fall within the scope of a recognized Bivens claim.
Publication Date: 2024-04-29
Practice Area: Antitrust
Industry: E-Commerce | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Matthew D. Stachel, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Wilmington, DE; William A. Isaacson, Amy J. Mauser, David E. Cole, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Washington, D.C. for plaintiff.
for defendant: David J. Baldwin, Peter C. McGivney, Berger Harris, Wilmington, DE; Joseph A. Ostoyich, Danielle Morello, Clifford Chance LLP, Washington, D.C.; Paul C. Cuomo, Heather Souder Choi, Adam Dec, Baker Botts LLP, Washington, D.C. for defendants.
Case Number: 15-108-RGA
Sherman Act violation claim failed under the rule of reason where plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence to define the relevant geographic or product market, but removal of plaintiff's products from a website, which hampered its ability to compete, was sufficient evidence of refusal to deal.
Publication Date: 2024-04-01
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Raeann Warner, Collins Price & Warner, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Michael P. Stafford, Elise K. Wolpert, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: 22-1452-RGA
Evidentiary record could support an inference that race played a role in defendant employer's failure to promote plaintiff sufficient to submit plaintiff's racial discrimination claim to the jury, as the promoted individual lacked the minimum qualifications and the reasons for not promoting plaintiff were plausibly inconsistent with his performance evaluations.
Publication Date: 2024-03-26
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas-Martin Happle, Millsboro, DE, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: Emily A. Letcher, Patricia L. Enerio, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: 22-1612-RGA
Court dismissed civil rights complaint arising from a New Jersey traffic stop involving a New Jersey resident, finding that it lacked personal jurisdiction.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-03-18
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David E. Moore, Bindu A. Palapura, Andrew L. Brown, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jason R. Bartlett, Jason A. Crotty, Marc J. Pernick, Mauriel Kapouytian Woods LLP, San Francisco, CA; Steven Callahan, Christopher T. Bovenkamp, Charhon Callahan Robson & Garza, PLLC, Dallas, TX for plaintiff.
for defendant: Adam W. Poff, Robert M. Vrana, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; James R. Batchelder, James L. Davis, Jr., Daniel W. Richards, Ropes & Gray LLP, East Palo Alto, CA; Colin P. Dunn, Ropes & Gray LLP, New York, NY for defendant.
Case Number: 22-677-RGA
Court dismissed inequitable conduct/unclean hands defenses where there were no allegations as to how alleged fraudulent misrepresentations affected the validity of the patent-in-suit and the allegations of fraud failed to meet the particularity requirement.
Publication Date: 2024-03-04
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Martina Tyreus Hufnal, Douglas E. McCann, Gregory R. Boofer, Fish & Richardson P.C., Wilmington, DE; Philip K. Chen, Fish & Richardson P.C., Boston, MA; Brian Coggio, Excylyn Hardin-Smith, Fish & Richardson P.C., New York, NY; Megan A. Chacon, Madelyn McCormick, Bernard Cryan, Fish & Richardson P.C., San Diego, CA, for plaintiffs.
for defendant: John C. Phillips, Jr., David A. Bilson, Phillips McLaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Michael Nutter, McGuireWoods LLP, Chicago, IL; Corinne S. Hockman, McGuireWoods LLP, Raleigh, NC; Daniel Withers, McGuireWoods LLP, Dallas, TX; Merritt Westcott, McGuireWoods LLP, Houston, TX; Dennis D. Gregory, McGuireWoods LLP, Austin, TX for defendants.
Case Number: 22-434-RGA
Court rejected proposed claim construction for testing method where patent language had failed to establish lexicography or disavowal to require specific test conditions.
Publication Date: 2024-02-05
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Health Care
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gary E. Junge, Schmittinger & Rodriguez, P.A., Dover, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Stacy A. Scrivani, Alexis R. Gambale, Stevens & Lee, P.C., Wilmington, DE; Lisa M. Scidurlo, Stevens & Lee, P.C., King of Prussia, PA; Michael M. Greenfield, Sasha A. Phillips, Stevens & Lee, P.C., Philadelphia, PA; Theresa M. Zechman, Stevens & Lee, P.C., Lancaster, PA for defendant.
Case Number: 22-1283-RGA
Court declined to dismiss religious discrimination claim where terminated employee adequately pled sincerely held religious belief supporting her objection to COVID-19 vaccines.
Publication Date: 2024-02-05
Practice Area: Mass Torts
Industry: Agriculture | Chemicals and Materials | Food and Beverage
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Andrew C. Dalton, Dalton & Associates P.A., Wilmington, DE; Scott M. Hendler, Hendler Flores Law, Austin, TX for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Jennifer C. Wasson, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Ryan D. Stottmann, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Adam V. Orlacchio, Blank Rome LLP, Wilmington, DE; Kelly E. Farnan, Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, DE; John C. Phillips, Jr., Phillips Goldman & Spence P.A., Wilmington, DE; Andrea E. Neuman, Mary Beth Maloney, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York, NY; William E. Thomson, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Michael L. Brem, Schirrmeister Diaz-Arrastia Brem LLP, Houston, TX for defendants.
Case Number: 12-695-RGA
Court declined to grant summary judgment for defendants where the parties' joint expert persuasively opined that plaintiffs' complaint qualified as a protective action under relevant Ecuadoran law, making plaintiffs' claims not time-barred under the Delaware borrowing statute.
Publication Date: 2024-01-29
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Electronics | Investments and Investment Advisory | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Mark D. Collins, Marcos A. Ramos, Cory Kandestin, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Mitchell A. Karlan, Paul J. Kremer, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP for appellants.
for defendant: Curtis Miller, Daniel B. Butz, Jonathan M. Weyland, Morris Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; James A. Bombulie, Dustin B. Hillsley, Akerman, LLP, Miami, FL; Brian P. Miller, King & Spalding LLP, Miami, FL for appellees.
Case Number: 22-179-RGA
Statute of limitations barred adversary complaints filed on behalf of debtors by their creditor where creditor's prior lawsuit against debtors based on the same factual predicate put debtors on notice of the claims raised in the adversary proceeding.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read