Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
211 results for '* judge:"District Judge Andrews"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2020-08-12
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ricky Thompson-El, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: Karine Sarkisian and Marc Stephen Casarino, White & Williams, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D69084
In this age discrimination matter, the court denied a motion to dismiss and allowed plaintiff an opportunity to supplement the record with a right-to-sue letter from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Publication Date: 2020-08-05
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Insurance
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Scott A. Holt and Curtis J. Crowther, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Daniel C. Herr, Law Office of Daniel C. Herr LLC, Wilmington, DE; Kristen Prinz and Amit Bindra, The Prinz Law Firm, P.C., Chicago, IL for defendant.
Case Number: D69061
The court denied defendant's motion to dismiss, because the record did not contain sufficient information to conduct a choice of law analysis.
Publication Date: 2020-08-05
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael Flynn and Anthony D. Raucci, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Steven N. Feldman, Christina V. Rayburn, Karen Younkins, Kevin X. Wang and Maxwell K. Coll, Hueston Hennigan LLP, Los Angeles, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Benjamin J. Schladweiler, Douglas R. Weider and James L. Ryerson, Greenberg Traurig, Wilmington, DE and Florham Park, NJ for defendant.
Case Number: D69058
Plaintiff alleged sufficient facts to demonstrate that its patents involved an inventive concept, rather than an abstract idea.
Publication Date: 2020-07-29
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Distribution and Wholesale | Retail
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen B. Brauerman, Bayard P.A., Wilmington, DE; Kent E. Baldauf, Jr. and Barry J. Coyne , The Webb Law Firm, Pittsburgh, PA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Michael F. Duggan and Marc Sposato, Marks, O’Neill, O’Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C., Wilmington, DE; Stephen H. Luther and Ryan T. Santurri, Allen, Dyer, Doppelt& Gilchrist, PA, Orlando, FL for defendants.
Case Number: D69064
Breach of contract claims were untimely where the claims accrued after plaintiff was put on notice defendant may have developed and patented a product based off plaintiff's product in breach of the parties' agreement.
Publication Date: 2020-07-22
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael Flynn and Anthony D. Raucci, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Steven N. Feldman, Christina V. Rayburn, Karen Younkins, Kevin X. Wang and Maxwell K. Coll, Hueston Hennigan LLP, Los Angeles, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Benjamin J. Schladweiler, Douglas R. Weider and James L. Ryerson, Greenberg Traurig, Wilmington, DE and Florham Park, NJ for defendant.
Case Number: D69058
Plaintiff alleged sufficient facts to demonstrate that its patents involved an inventive concept, rather than an abstract idea.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2020-07-22
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Insurance
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Scott A. Holt and Curtis J. Crowther, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Daniel C. Herr, Law Office of Daniel C. Herr LLC, Wilmington, DE; Kristen Prinz and Amit Bindra, The Prinz Law Firm, P.C., Chicago, IL for defendant.
Case Number: D69061
The court denied defendant's motion to dismiss, because the record did not contain sufficient information to conduct a choice of law analysis.
Publication Date: 2020-07-01
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian D. Long, Rigrodsky&Long, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Ted E. Trief, Shelly L. Friedland, EyalDror, Trief&Olk, New York, NY; Peter S. Pearlman, Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf LLP, Saddle Brook, NJ; Macy D. Hanson, The Law Office of Macy D. Hanson, PLLC, Madison, MS for plaintiffs.
for defendant: J. Cory Falgowski, Burr & Forman LLP, Wilmington, DE; K. Bryance Metheny, Ronald W. Flowers, Jr., Martin E. Burke, H. Carlton Hilson, Burr & Forman LLP, Birmingham, AL for defendant.
Case Number: D69030
Court declined to dismiss opt-in plaintiffs from wage and hour collective action on grounds of judicial estoppel for those plaintiffs' failures to disclose their claims on their bankruptcy petition, where those plaintiffs either retained the opportunity to amend their bankruptcy petitions or where any inference of bad faith was not strong enough to warrant the sanction of dismissal.
Publication Date: 2020-06-10
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Construction
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Scott T. Earle, Zarwin Baum DeVito Kaplan Schaer Toddy, P.C., Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Paul A. Bradley, Maron Marvel Bradley Anderson & Tardy LLC, Wilmington, DE; Thomas J. Connick, Connick Law LLC, Beachwood, OH for defendants.
Case Number: D69011
Plaintiff stated a claim for breach of contract, but the gist of the action doctrine barred the tort claims.
Publication Date: 2020-05-27
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gregory F. Fischer, Cozen O’Connor, Wilmington, DE; Michael B. de Leeuw, Matthew L. Elkin, and Martin Bloor, Cozen O’Connor, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Andrew L. Cole and Bradley P. Lehman, Cole Schotz, Wilmington, DE; Steven R. Klein and Rachel A. Mongiello, Cole Schotz, Hackensack, NJ for defendant.
Case Number: D68990
Tortious interference counterclaim brought by LLC member terminated as CEO dismissed on summary judgment where the LLC duty of loyalty did not extend to members acting with respect to one another in the employment context.
Publication Date: 2020-05-20
Practice Area: Deals and Transactions
Industry: Food and Beverage
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen B. Brauerman and Sarah T. Andrade, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Edward S. Sledge IV, Whitt Steineker, Zachary A. Madonia, Hillary C. Campbell and K. Laney Gifford, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Birmingham, AL for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Philip A. Rovner and Jonathan A. Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; J. Allen Maines, Caroline Johnson Tanner, A. André Hendrick, Matthew D. Friedlander, Patrick B. Reagin and Jacquelyn Thomas Watts, Holland & Knight LLP, Atlanta, GA for defendants.
Case Number: D68987
Defendants were bound by a forum selection clause in an asset purchase agreement, so the court granted plaintiffs' motion to remand the case to state court.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read