Filter This View

  • Nexeon Ltd. v. EaglePicher Tech. LLC

    Publication Date: 2018-05-23
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Electronics
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Mary Matterer, Stephen R. Carden, Ann C. Palma and James V. Suggs for plaintiff
    for defendant: Thomas C. Grimm, Jeremy A. Tigan and Jennifer Hayes for defendants.
    Case Number: D68154

    The court engaged in claim construction of multiple terms associated with fabricating silicon-based fibers and particles for use in rechargeable lithium ion batteries.

  • D&M Holdings, Inc. v. Sonos, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-03-07
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Michael J. Flynn, John M. Jackson, Matthew C. Acosta, Blake T. Dietrich, Chris-topher J. Rourk, Robert P. Latham, David Folsom and Wasif Qureshi for plaintiffs
    for defendant: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, George I. Lee, Sean M. Sullivan, Rory P. Shea, J. Dan Smith, Mi-chael P. Boyea, Cole B. Richter and Jae Y. Park for defendant.
    Case Number: D68065

    In this patent litigation matter, the court engaged in claim construction in connection with issues arising in defendants motions for summary judgment.

  • Kraft v. Office of Chief Counsel, Div. of Veterans Affairs, North Atlantic Dist.

    Publication Date: 2018-02-21
    Practice Area: Administrative Law | Government
    Industry: Federal Government
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: N/A
    for defendant: David C. Weiss and Laura D. Hatcher for defendant.
    Case Number: D68049

    The court granted a motion to dismiss regarding a claim involving Veterans Administration benefits, because another tribunal had exclusive jurisdiction pursuant to statute.

  • TQ Delta, LLC v. 2Wire, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-02-21
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Peter J. McAndrews, Paul W. McAndrews and Rajendra A. Chiplunkar for plaintiff
    for defendant: Colm F. Connolly, Jody Barillare, Brett M. Schuman, Rachel M. Walsh and David L. Simson for defend-ant 2Wire, Inc.; Kenneth L. Dorsney, Paul M. Sykes, Melissa Hotze and Elizabeth J. Rader for defend-ants Adtran Inc. and Zyxel Communications Inc.
    Case Number: D68053

    In this claim construction matter, the court construed various terms relating to asynchronous transfer mode communications systems.

  • Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-01-31
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, and Alan Silverstein, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Paul J. Andre, Lisa Kobialka, James R. Hannah, and Hannah Lee, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP, Menlo Park, CA; Aaron M. Frankel, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld and Stephen J. Kraftschik, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael A. Tomasulo, Gino Cheng, David K. Lin, and Joe S. Netikosol, Winston & Strawn LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Michael M. Murray, Winston & Strawn LLP, New York, NY; David P. Enzminger, Winston & Strawn, Menlo Park, CA; Dan K. Webb and Kathleen B. Barry, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL; Thomas M. Dunham and Andrew R. Soomer, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC; Krista M. Enns, Winston & Strawn LLP, San Francisco, CA, attorneys for defendants.
    Case Number: D68022

    Patent term computer network included both multiple physical computers and multiple processes executing on a single computer, where intrinsic evidence demonstrated dependent claims which described computer network as involving processes on a single computer.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Wrongful Use of Civil Proceedings and Related Torts in Pennsylvania, Second Edition

    Authors: George Bochetto, David P. Heim, John A. O’Connell, Robert S. Tintner

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

    Publication Date: 2018-01-24
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Douglas E. McCann, Martina Tyreus Hufnal, John S. Goetz, Brian D. Coggio, Ahmed J. Davis, Min Woo Park, Sarah M. Cork, Matt Colvin, D. Michael Underhill, Jon R. Knight, William D. Marsillo, Alex Potter, Bill Ward and Martin Ellison for plaintiffs
    for defendant: Arthur G. Connolly III, Ryan P. Newell, Mary Akhimien, Raymond N. Nimrod, Brian P. Biddinger, Gregory D. Bonifield, John P. Galanek, Amanda K. Antons and Matthew Traupman for defendant.
    Case Number: D68021

    The court engaged in claim construction in this patent litigation matter involving ten patents relating to phar-maceuticals for treating diabetes and pen-type injectors used to administer the drug.

  • Newsome v. Lawson

    Publication Date: 2018-01-17
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Discovery
    Industry: Legal Services
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Laura Davis Jones, James E. O'Neill, Ali M.M. Mojdehi and Janet Dean Gertz for plaintiff
    for defendant: James W. Semple, Paula J. Quillin and Joseph R. Farris for defendants.
    Case Number: D68011

    Attorneys who formerly engaged in joint representation were not allowed to withhold documents based on a non-party joint clients objection to disclosure, and the attorney-client privilege did not apply to communications relevant to the matter of common interest for which they were retained as joint attorneys.

  • Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-01-03
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Entertainment and Leisure | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, Paul J. Andre, Lisa Kobialka, James R. Hannah, Hannah Lee and Aaron M. Frankel for plaintiff
    for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Stephen J. Kraftschik, Michael A. Tomasulo, Gino Cheng, David K. Lin, Joe S. Netikosol, Michael M. Murray, David P. Enzminger, Dan K. Webb and Kathleen B. Barry for defendants.
    Case Number: D67993

    The court construed various terms in this patent litigation relating to computer technology.

  • Alex Is The Best, LLC v. Blu Prods., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2017-12-06
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen B. Brauerman and Sara E. Bussiere, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: Dennis J. Butler and John D. Simmons, Panitch Schwarze Belisaro & Nadel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Adam W. Poff and Robert M. Vrana, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jack B. Blumenfeld and Stephen J. Kraftschik, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; John C. Phillips and David A. Bilson, Phillips Goldman McLaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Chad S.C. Stover, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Chicago, IL; Todd G. Vare and Jeffrey M. Barron, Barnes & Thornburg, LLP, Indianapolis, IN, attorneys for defendant.
    Case Number: D67958

    Court rejected plaintiffs assertion that patent claims of primary mode of communication and another available mode of communication had their plain meanings, adopting constructions that comported with the parties understanding that the claimed device had to designate a first mode of communication on start-up, and would use another mode when the primary one was unavailable.

  • U.S. v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2017-12-06
    Practice Area: Business Torts | Government
    Industry: Federal Government | Health Care | Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeffrey S. Goddess, P. Bradford deLeeuw and David S. Stone for plaintiffs
    for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Rodger D. Smith II, Enu Mainigi, Craig D. Singer, Holly Conley and D. Keith Clouser for defendants.
    Case Number: D67963

    The public information bar precluded a relators claim regarding fraudulent conduct under the False Claims Act. Motion to dismiss granted, with prejudice.