Filter This View

  • Delaware State Sportsmen's Ass'n Inc. v. Delaware Dep't of Safety & Homeland Sec.

    Publication Date: 2023-04-11
    Practice Area: Constitutional Law
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Francis G.X. Pileggi, Sean M. Brennecke, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE; Alexander D. MacMullan, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Wayne, PA; Bradley P. Lehman, Gellert Scali Busenkell & Brown LLC, Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: David E. Ross, Bradley R. Aronstam, Garrett B. Moritz, S. Reiko Rogozen, Roger S. Stronach, Holly Newell, Elizabeth M. Taylor, Thomas C. Mandracchia, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Kenneth L. Wan, Caneel Radinson-Blasucci, State of Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
    Case Number: 22-951-RGA

    Preliminary injunction to prevent enforcement of restrictions on assault weapons and large capacity magazines was denied where regulations were tailored to dangerousness of such weapons and were consistent with historical regulations on other dangerous weapons such as machine guns.

  • Mirtech, Inc. v. Agrofresh, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2023-04-04
    Practice Area: Contracts
    Industry: Agriculture | Food and Beverage
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Glenn A. Brown, Real World Law, P.C., Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs/counter-defendants.
    for defendant: Chad S.C. Stover, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant/counter-plaintiff.
    Case Number: 20-1170-RGA

    The court denied defendant's motion for summary judgment in a matter involving a breach of contract claim.

  • Takadu LTD., v. Innovyze, LLC

    Publication Date: 2023-04-04
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Software | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen B. Brauerman, Ronald P. Golden III, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Robert P. Feinland, Jason J. Poulos, Meister Seelig & Fein LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Anne S. Gaza, Samantha G. Wilson, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael A. Jacobs, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA; Kyle Mooney, Kyle D. Friedland, Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York, NY for defendant.
    Case Number: 21-291-RGA

    The court ordered the parties to submit a proposed order consistent with the court's ruling on several disputed claim construction terms at issue in a patent litigation matter.

  • MHL Custom, Inc. v. Waydoo USA, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2023-03-28
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Manufacturing
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Blake A. Bennett, Cooch and Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Dennis D. Murrell, Robert J. Theuerkauf, Brian P. McGraw, Megan E. Gibson, Middleton Reutlinger, Louisville, KY for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Kelly E. Farnan, Dorronda R. Bordley, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Edgar H. Haug, Robert E. Colletti, Mark Basanta, and Roman Khasidov, Haug Partners LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
    Case Number: D70178

    Court denied parties' cross-motions for summary judgment where there were genuine issues of material fact regarding whether defendants' products had dynamic or static stability as required by the specification of the patents in suit.

  • Barry v. Stryker Corp.

    Publication Date: 2023-03-28
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Biotechnology | Health Care
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Regina S.E. Murphy, Barnes & Thornburg, LLP, Wilmington, DE; D . Clay Holloway, Mitchell Stockwell, Courtney S. Dabbiere, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, Atlanta, GA; Dario A. Machleidt, Christopher P. Damitio, Kathleen R.Geyer, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, Seattle, WA; Taylor J. Pfingst, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Andrew W. Rinehart, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, Winston-Salem, NC for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Jeremy Tigan, Brian P. Egan, Cameron P. Clark, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jonathan G. Graves, Joseph E. Van Tassel, Cooley LLP, Reston, VA; Adam M. Pivovar, Cooley, LLP, Washington, DC; Alissa M. Wood, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA; Chad T. Nitta, Jason S. Jackson, Heather N Tilley, Kutak Rock, LLP, Denver, CO for defendants.
    Case Number: D70177

    The court conducted a detailed analysis of claim construction terms in a patent litigation matter concerning spinal surgeries and deformities.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Estate Litigation 2014

    Authors: Michael R. Griffinger, Paul F. Cullum III

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Exeltis USA Inc. v. Lupin Ltd.

    Publication Date: 2023-03-21
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Martina T. Hufnal, Douglas E. McCann, Gregory R. Booker, Fish & Richardson P.C., Wilmington, DE; Brian Coggio, Fish & Richardson P.C., New York, NY; Megan A. Chacon, Bernard Cryan, Fish & Richardson P.C., San Diego, CA for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: John C. Phillips, Jr., David A. Bilson, Phillips Mclaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Michael Nutter, McGuireWoods LLP, Chicago, IL; Merritt Westcott, McGuireWoods LLP, Houston, TX; Corinne S. Hockman, McGuireWoods LLP, Raleigh, NC for defendants.
    Case Number: 22-434-RGA

    Patentees created their own definition for the term "about," but defined it in such a way as to make the term indefinite since it effectively created an unbounded value range for the claim.

  • Rodriguez v. Capital Vision Serv., LLC

    Publication Date: 2023-02-28
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: Health Care | Retail
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 21-1222-RGA

    Discrimination claims failed due to lack of evidence that discriminatory animus motivated adverse employment decisions or lack of adequate comparators, where employer had performance-related reasons for its decision.

  • Barry v. Stryker Corp.

    Publication Date: 2022-11-29
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Health Care | Manufacturing
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Dominick T. Gattuso, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Clay Holloway, Mitchell G. Stockwell, Courtney S. Dabbiere, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, Atlanta, GA; Dario A. Machleidt, Kathleen R. Geyer, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, Seattle, WA; Taylor J. Pfingst, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Andrew W. Rinehart, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, Winston-Salem, NC for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Brian P. Egan, Cameron P. Clark, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Chad T. Nitta, Jason S. Jackson, Heather N. Tilley, Kutak Rock, LLP, Denver, CO for defendants.
    Case Number: 20-1787-RGA

    The court denied defendants' request for leave to amend their complaint, finding that voluminous discovery was not an adequate basis for delay and defendants did not act with diligence in seeking leave to amend.

  • Allergan USA, Inc. v. Sun Pharm. Indus. Ltd.

    Publication Date: 2022-11-29
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Jeremy A. Tigan, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Lisa B. Pensabene, Hassen A. Sayeed, Daniel O'Boyle, Carolyn S. Wall, James Y. Li, Mark A. Hayden, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Dominick T. Gattuso, Heyman Energio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Charles B. Klein, Jovial Wong, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC; Kevin J. Boyle, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL for defendant.
    Case Number: 19-1727-RGA

    The court granted plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings in part and denied in part.

  • In re Entresto Patent Litig.

    Publication Date: 2022-11-29
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel M. Silver, Alexandra M. Joyce, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Nicholas N. Kallas, Christina Schwarz, Christopher E. Loh, Susanne L. Flanders, Jared L. Stringham, Shannon K. Clark, Laura K. Fishwick, Gregory J. Manas, Venable LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Dominick T. Gattuso, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Scott A. Cunning II, Elizabeth M. Crompton, Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein, LLP, Washington, DC; C. Kyle Musgrove, Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein, LLP, Charlotte, NC for defendant.
    Case Number: 20-md-2930-RGA

    Court dismissed infringement claims and counterclaims of non-infringement after defendant converted its Paragraph IV certification to a 21 U.S.C. §355(j)(2)(A)(viii) statement averring the non-infringement of its ANDA product.