• Cignex Datamatics, Inc. v. Lam Research Corp.

    Publication Date: 2019-03-20
    Practice Area: Contracts
    Industry: Consulting | Software | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Christopher P. Simon and David G. Holmes, Cross & Simon, LLC, Wilmington, DE, for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Theodore A. Kittila and James G, McMillan, III, Halloran Farkas + Kittila LLP, Wilmington, DE, for defendant.

    Case Number: D68494

    Defendant's motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's breach of contract claim denied where the contract terms were ambiguous as to the trigger for payment and where the parties appeared to have differing expectations.

  • Canfield v. FCA US LLC

    Publication Date: 2019-03-20
    Practice Area: Products Liability
    Industry: Automotive
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeffrey S. Goddess and P. Bradford deLeeuw, Rosenthal, Monhait & Goddess, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Nicholas A. Migliaccio and Jason S. Rathod, Migliaccio & Rathod LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Kenneth L. Dorsney, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE; Kathy A. Wisniewski and Stephen A. D'Aunoy, Thompson Coburn LLP, St. Louis, MO for defendants.

    Case Number: D68496

    Implied warranty claims not dismissed where defendant allegedly engaged in active concealment of defect, which tolled the limitations periods, and where air-outs on the tires on plaintiffs' vehicles established their potentially non-merchantable condition and put defendant on notice when plaintiffs brought their vehicles in for service.

  • LKQ Corp. v. United States Dep't of Homeland Sec.

    Publication Date: 2019-03-06
    Practice Area: Administrative Law | Trademarks
    Industry: Automotive | Manufacturing
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Elizabeth S. Fenton, Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Wilmington, DE; Barry F. Irwin, Reid P. Huefner and Chris Eggert, Irwin LP, Chicago, IL for plaintiff.
    for defendant: David C. Weiss, United States Attorney, Jennifer Hall, Assistant United States Attorney, Wilmington, DE; Mark Lacedonia, Tate Keenan, Office of Chief Counsel, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, De-partment of Homeland Security, Washington, DC for defendants.

    Case Number: D68451

    The court lacked subjected matter jurisdiction as to forfeiture claims because the agency had discretion in handling such claims, and plaintiff had an alternative remedy.

  • Prescient Med. Holdings, LLC v. Lab. Corp. of Am. Holdings

    Publication Date: 2019-02-27
    Practice Area: Antitrust
    Industry: Health Care
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard H. Cross, Jr., Cross & Simon, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Daniel W. Tarpey and Matthew M. Showel, Tarpey Wix LLC, Chicago, IL for plaintiff. Raymond J. DiCamillo, Chad Shandler and Katharine L. Mowery, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Steven F. Barley, Marc A. Marinaccio and J. Robert Robertson, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC for Laboratory Corp. of America defend-ants.
    for defendant: Jody C. Barillare, Eric Kraeutler, Steven A. Reed, R. Brendan Fee, Zachary M. Johns and Alexandra M. Lastowski, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE and Philadelphia, PA for AmeriHealth de-fendants.

    Case Number: D68476

    Plaintiff lacked standing to assert an antitrust claim and it failed to adequately allege a relevant market.

  • E. Hedinger AG v. Brainwave Science, LLC

    Publication Date: 2019-02-27
    Practice Area: Contracts | Dispute Resolution
    Industry: Consumer Products | Distribution and Wholesale
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James D. Taylor, Jr., Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Wilmington, DE; Robert McHale, McHale Law, Boston, MA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: David A. Dorey and Craig N. Haring, Blank Rome LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jason A. Synderman, John Wixted, and Huaou Yan, Blank Rome LLP, Philadelphia, PA for defendants.

    Case Number: D68471

    Plaintiffs' complaint dismissed in favor of an agreement to arbitrate between the parties, where all of plaintiffs' claims arose from the parties' contract containing an enforceable arbitration clause, which was valid despite naming a non-existent arbitration forum and where defendants had not waived their right to arbitrate before another court.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Texas Personal Automobile Insurance Policy 2020

    Authors: Janet K. Colaneri

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund v. Navient Corp.

    Publication Date: 2019-02-20
    Practice Area: Securities Litigation
    Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Investments and Investment Advisory
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Patrick F. Morris, Karen L. Morris and R. Michael Lindsey, Morris and Morris LLC, Wilmington, DE; Ste-ven E. Fineman, Daniel P. Chiplock, Michael J. Miarmi, Richard M. Heimann, Bruce W. Leppla and Sha-ron M. Lee, Liefe Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Kelly E. Farnan, Richards Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Peter A. Wald, Abid R. Qureshi, Christopher S. Turner and Christopher R. Harris, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC for Navient Corp. and individual defendants. Kevin G. Abrams and John M. Seaman, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wil-mington, DE; Adam S. Hakki, Daniel C. Lewis and Anthony D. Marinello of Shearman & Sterling LLP for underwriter defendants.

    Case Number: D68465

    Plaintiffs adequately stated claims for securities violations, except with regard to statements that were mere puffery and where plaintiffs failed to demonstrate scienter.

  • Keel v. Delaware State Univ. Bd. of Tr.

    Publication Date: 2019-02-20
    Practice Area: Civil Rights | Education Law
    Industry: Education
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Laura Davis Jones, James I. Stang, and James E. O'Neill, Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, Wilmington, DE; Alexander S. Zalkin and Ryan M. Cohen, The Zalkin Law Firm, P.C., San Diego, CA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: James D. Taylor, Jr., Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.

    Case Number: D68464

    Plaintiff's Title IX and equal protection claims were time-barred where her timely allegations merely amounted to continuing ill effects from the original alleged violations and were not continual unlawful affirmative acts by defendants that would support finding plaintiff's claim timely under a continuing violation theory.

  • Turulski v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs

    Publication Date: 2019-02-13
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Federal Government
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David C. Weiss and Jennifer Lynne Hall, U.S. Attorney's Office, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
    for defendant: N/A

    Case Number: D68461

    The court dismissed plaintiff's complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act because he failed to show that he exhausted his administrative remedies prior to filing in court.

  • Schwartz v. Berryhill

    Publication Date: 2019-01-23
    Practice Area: Administrative Law | Evidence
    Industry: Health Care
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gary C. Linarducci, New Castle, DE; Thomas D. Sutton, Leventhal, Sutton & Gornstein, Trevose, PA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Nora Koch and Heather Benderson, Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel, Philadelphia, PA for defendant.

    Case Number: D68436

    An administrative law judge improperly substituted her opinion for that of plaintiff's treating specialist, and her opinion re-garding plaintiff's medical condition was not based on substantial evidence.

  • AgroFresh Inc. v. Mirtech, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2019-01-16
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Agriculture | Chemicals and Materials | Consumer Products
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Chad S.C. Stover and Regina S.E. Murphy, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Wilmington, DE; Robert D. Mac-Gill, Lynn C. Tyler, Deborah Pollack-Milgate, Joseph T. Wendt and Jessica M. Lindemann, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Indianapolis, IN for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Frederick L. Cottrell, III, Jeffrey L. Moyer and Nicole K. Pedi of Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, DE; Gerald F. Ivey, John M. Williamson, Anand K. Sharma, Rajeev Gupta, Aidan C. Skoyles, Karthik Kumar and Daniel F. Roland, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC for defendant.

    Case Number: D68424

    In this patent claim construction matter, the court provided clarification to give meaning to all the claim terms.