Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
210 results for '* judge:"Judge Andrews"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2018-03-07
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Michael J. Flynn, John M. Jackson, Matthew C. Acosta, Blake T. Dietrich, Chris-topher J. Rourk, Robert P. Latham, David Folsom and Wasif Qureshi for plaintiffs
for defendant: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, George I. Lee, Sean M. Sullivan, Rory P. Shea, J. Dan Smith, Mi-chael P. Boyea, Cole B. Richter and Jae Y. Park for defendant.
Case Number: D68065
In this patent litigation matter, the court engaged in claim construction in connection with issues arising in defendants motions for summary judgment.
Publication Date: 2018-02-28
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Biotechnology
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bindu A. Palapura, Chad E. Nydegger and Brent P. Lorimer for plaintiff
for defendant: Arthur G. Connolly, III, Thomas S. Reynolds, Jeremy Adelson and Joseph J. Jacobi for defendant.
Case Number: D68060
In this patent matter, the court granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment of no invalidity.
Publication Date: 2018-02-21
Practice Area: Administrative Law | Government
Industry: Federal Government
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: N/A
for defendant: David C. Weiss and Laura D. Hatcher for defendant.
Case Number: D68049
The court granted a motion to dismiss regarding a claim involving Veterans Administration benefits, because another tribunal had exclusive jurisdiction pursuant to statute.
Publication Date: 2018-02-21
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Peter J. McAndrews, Paul W. McAndrews and Rajendra A. Chiplunkar for plaintiff
for defendant: Colm F. Connolly, Jody Barillare, Brett M. Schuman, Rachel M. Walsh and David L. Simson for defend-ant 2Wire, Inc.; Kenneth L. Dorsney, Paul M. Sykes, Melissa Hotze and Elizabeth J. Rader for defend-ants Adtran Inc. and Zyxel Communications Inc.
Case Number: D68053
In this claim construction matter, the court construed various terms relating to asynchronous transfer mode communications systems.
Publication Date: 2018-02-14
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Consumer Products | Health Care
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Colm F. Connolly, David W. Marston, Jr., Jody C. Barillare, and John V. Goodman, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wimington, DE; Thomas B. Kenworthy and Julie S. Goldemberg, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA; Raymond R. Moser, Jr., Moser Taboada, Shrewsbury, NJ, attorneys for plaintiff
for defendant: Adam W. Poff and Pilar G. Kraman, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilimington, DE; Douglas J. Nash, John D. Cook, Kathryn D. Cornish, Barclay Damon, LLP, Syracuse, NY, attorneys for defendant.
Case Number: D68038
Willful infringement and enhanced damages claim denied where defendants willful blindness to its products possible infringement of plaintiffs patents was at most a substitute for knowledge and did not constitute sufficient egregious behavior to support enhanced damages.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Daniel A. Cohen, Joshua Feinstein
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2018-01-31
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Contractual Disputes
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68028
The court lacked subject matter jurisdiction where the complaint did not allege sufficient facts to support ei-ther federal question or diversity jurisdiction.
Publication Date: 2018-01-31
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, and Alan Silverstein, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Paul J. Andre, Lisa Kobialka, James R. Hannah, and Hannah Lee, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP, Menlo Park, CA; Aaron M. Frankel, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for plaintiff
for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld and Stephen J. Kraftschik, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael A. Tomasulo, Gino Cheng, David K. Lin, and Joe S. Netikosol, Winston & Strawn LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Michael M. Murray, Winston & Strawn LLP, New York, NY; David P. Enzminger, Winston & Strawn, Menlo Park, CA; Dan K. Webb and Kathleen B. Barry, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL; Thomas M. Dunham and Andrew R. Soomer, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC; Krista M. Enns, Winston & Strawn LLP, San Francisco, CA, attorneys for defendants.
Case Number: D68022
Patent term computer network included both multiple physical computers and multiple processes executing on a single computer, where intrinsic evidence demonstrated dependent claims which described computer network as involving processes on a single computer.
Publication Date: 2018-01-24
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Douglas E. McCann, Martina Tyreus Hufnal, John S. Goetz, Brian D. Coggio, Ahmed J. Davis, Min Woo Park, Sarah M. Cork, Matt Colvin, D. Michael Underhill, Jon R. Knight, William D. Marsillo, Alex Potter, Bill Ward and Martin Ellison for plaintiffs
for defendant: Arthur G. Connolly III, Ryan P. Newell, Mary Akhimien, Raymond N. Nimrod, Brian P. Biddinger, Gregory D. Bonifield, John P. Galanek, Amanda K. Antons and Matthew Traupman for defendant.
Case Number: D68021
The court engaged in claim construction in this patent litigation matter involving ten patents relating to phar-maceuticals for treating diabetes and pen-type injectors used to administer the drug.
Publication Date: 2018-01-24
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: Distribution and Wholesale | Federal Government
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68018
The allegations of a complaint filed by pro se litigant were legally and factually frivolous and failed to state a claim for relief, and the court determined amendment would be futile.
Publication Date: 2018-01-17
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Discovery
Industry: Legal Services
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Laura Davis Jones, James E. O'Neill, Ali M.M. Mojdehi and Janet Dean Gertz for plaintiff
for defendant: James W. Semple, Paula J. Quillin and Joseph R. Farris for defendants.
Case Number: D68011
Attorneys who formerly engaged in joint representation were not allowed to withhold documents based on a non-party joint clients objection to disclosure, and the attorney-client privilege did not apply to communications relevant to the matter of common interest for which they were retained as joint attorneys.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read