Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
46 results for '* judge:"Per Curiam"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2019-11-27
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68789
Plaintiff in this civil rights action had the opportunity of challenging a prior criminal conviction. On appeal, the court held that dismissal of this civil rights matter was appropriate.
Publication Date: 2019-11-06
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Energy
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68760
District court correctly affirmed the bankruptcy court's disallowance of a bondholder's proof of claim where the bondholder had sold the bonds prior to filing a proof of claim, since the buyer of the bonds became the party with the right to payment of the principal and interest on the bond.
Publication Date: 2019-10-23
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68743
District court erred in dismissing pro se complaint for failure to prosecute where district court failed to undertake meritoriousness assessment, consider alternatives to dismissal, or admonish plaintiff to respond to defendants' discovery requests.
Publication Date: 2019-09-25
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68711
Prison inmate's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim properly dismissed where claim merely expressed inmate's disagreement with the course of treatment provided.
Publication Date: 2019-05-01
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael J. Barry, Christine M. Mackintosh, Michael T. Manuel and Rebecca A. Musarra, Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Wilming-ton, DE for petitioners.
for defendant: Michael P. Kelly, Steven P. Wood and Daniel J. Brown, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Marc J. Sonnenfeld, Karen Pieslak Pohlmann and Laura Hughes McNally, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA for respondent. Ned Wein-berger, Derrick Farrell and Thomas Curry, Labaton Sucharow LLP, Wilmington, DE for amici curiae professors in support of petitioners. Gregory P. Williams, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE for amici curiae professors in support of respondent.
Case Number: D68549
The chancery court abused its discretion in this statutory appraisal proceeding when valuing the shares by deducting unspeci-fied reduced agency costs from the deal price.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2018-11-21
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68359
Excessive force claim properly denied where plaintiff unable to identify any specific law enforcement officer who inflicted any alleged excessive force and where the evidence demonstrated that the force used was reasonable under the circumstances to detain and arrest plaintiff.
Publication Date: 2018-08-15
Practice Area: Civil Rights | Judges
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68251
A party failed to demonstrate any harm from a judge's failure to disqualify herself due to a conflict of interest, so the motion for relief from the judgment was properly denied.
Publication Date: 2018-08-01
Practice Area: Constitutional Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68237
An inmate failed to state a claim for improper medical care where he did not show prison officials were delib-erately indifferent to his serious medical needs.
Publication Date: 2018-06-13
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68174
Action was dismissed for lack of prosecution where pro se litigant failed to respond to defendants' discovery requests and had history of dilatory and bad faith conduct.
Publication Date: 2018-05-30
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Civil Procedure | Personal Injury
Industry: Insurance
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68159
Driver's Privacy Protection Act claim correctly barred under claim and issue preclusion where previously dismissed by other courts on grounds that such claim failed where defendants obtained the driver's personal information directly from the driver.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read