Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
37 results for '* topic:"Consumer Protection"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-11-12
Practice Area: Consumer Protection
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | E-Commerce | Software
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Alexander L. Braitberg, Andrew D. Schlichter, Joel Rohlf, Nathan D. Stump, Peter Cosgrove, Schlichter Bogard LLP, St. Louis, MO; David T. Crumplar, Jacobs & Crumplar, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Jody C. Barillare, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Ari M. Selman, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, New York, NY; Elizabeth Herrington, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Chicago, IL; Jordan McCrary, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Raechel K. Kummer, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Washington, DC, attorneys for defendant.
Case Number: 1:20-cv-01399-SB
Court dismissed claim under Illinois Biometric Privacy Act where majority of alleged conduct occurred outside Illinois and defendant was not the party responsible for the alleged voiceprinting.
Publication Date: 2024-11-05
Practice Area: Consumer Protection
Industry: Biotechnology | Distribution and Wholesale | Retail
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Dennis C. Reich, Reich & Binstock, Houston, TX; Steffan T. Keeton, Keeton Firm LLC, Pittsburgh, PA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Adam W. Poff, Samantha G. Wilson, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP, Wilmington, DE; Kelly A. Warlich, McGuireWoods, Charlotte, NC; R. Trent Taylor, McGuireWoods, Richmond, VA for defendant.
Case Number: 1:21-cv-00665-SB
Court denied reconsideration of rejection of leave to amend where proposed new defendant was known to plaintiff before he filed his first complaint.
Publication Date: 2024-10-29
Practice Area: Consumer Protection
Industry: E-Commerce
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Alexander L. Braitberg, Andrew D. Schlichter, Joel Rohlf, Nathan D. Stump, Peter Cosgrove, Schlichter Bogard LLP, St. Louis, MO; David T. Crumplar, Jacobs & Crumplar, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Jody C. Barillare, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Ari M. Selman, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, New York, NY; Elizabeth Herrington, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Chicago, IL; Jordan McCrary, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Raechel K. Kummer, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Washington, DC for defendant.
Case Number: 1:20-cv-01399-SB
Court granted motion for judgment on the pleadings where plaintiffs failed to amend their complaint to add or change allegations that would affect the reasons why the court previously dismissed the claim.
Publication Date: 2024-07-23
Practice Area: Consumer Protection
Industry: Automotive
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Williams
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert J. Kriner, Jr., Scott M. Tucker, Chimicles Schwartz Kriner & Donaldson-Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE; Timothy N. Mathews, Alex M. Kashurba, Chimicles Schwartz Kriner & Donaldson-Smith LLP, Haverford, PA; Russell D. Paul, Abigail J. Gertner, Amey J. Park, Natalie Lesser, Berger Montague PC, Wilmington, DE; Tarek H. Zohdy, Cody R. Padgett, Laura E. Goolsby, Capstone Law APC, Los Angeles, CA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Christian J. Singewald, White & Williams, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: 23-00632-GBW
Court declined to dismiss vehicle defect claims where plaintiffs sufficiently identified the nature of the defect and claimed losses beyond that which would be compensated through the manufacturer's recall program.
Publication Date: 2024-06-03
Practice Area: Consumer Protection
Industry: E-Commerce | Entertainment and Leisure
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Zurn
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ryan D. Stottmann, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Robert J. Kriner, Jr., Chimicles, Schwartz Kriner & Donaldson-Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: 2024-0040-MTZ
Court denied confidentiality of litigation record motion where parties could not rely on a contractual provision to demand confidentiality and movant failed to overcome the presumption in favor of public access.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-01-15
Practice Area: Consumer Protection
Industry: E-Commerce | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Raj Patel, Indianapolis, IN, plaintiff pro se.
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-797 (MN)
Court dismissed pro se complaint as unintelligible and barred by res judicata.
Publication Date: 2023-11-06
Practice Area: Consumer Protection
Industry: Hospitality and Lodging | State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Karsnitz
Attorneys: For plaintiff: John W. Paradee, Brian V. DeMott, Dover, DE for petitioner.
for defendant: Owen P. Lefkon, Ryan T. Costa, Deputy Attorneys General, State of Delaware Department of Justice Wilmington, DE for respondent.
Case Number: S23M-06-018-CAK
Consumer Protection Unit had statutory authority to issue subpoenas to affiliate of manufactured home community owners where it was not exclusively bound to make civil investigative demands under the Consumer Fraud Act, and the subpoenas were sufficiently tailored to the scope of an investigation into the safety of the community residents.
Publication Date: 2023-11-06
Practice Area: Consumer Protection
Industry: Automotive
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Hughes
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ian Connor Bifferato, The Bifferato Firm, Wilmington, DE; Rosemary M. Rivas, David Stein, Kyla J. Gibboney, Gibbs Law Group LLP, Oakland, CA; William H. Anderson, Handley Farah & Anderson PLLC, Boulder, CO; Rebecca P. Chang, Handley Farah & Anderson PLLC, New York, NY; Simon Wiener, Handley Farah & Anderson PLLC, Boston, MA; Jon M. Herskowitz, Baron & Herskowitz, Miami, FL for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Patrick M. Brannigan, Jessica L. Reno, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Stephen A. D’Aunoy, Scott H. Morgan, Thompson Coburn LLP, St. Louis, MO for defendant.
Case Number: 22-00518-TMH
Vehicle purchasers' claims arising from manufacturers destination charge practices failed where federal law only required vehicle window stickers to list the price charged by a manufacturer to a dealer to ship vehicles from the factory to the dealer lot and there was no evidence that allegedly inflated destination charges caused consumers to pay more for vehicles as ultimate purchase prices were set by dealerships.
Publication Date: 2023-10-02
Practice Area: Consumer Protection
Industry: Automotive
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Wallach
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kelly A. Green, Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Russell D. Paul, Amey J. Park, Abigail J. Gertner, Natalie Lesser, Berger Montague PC, Philadelphia, PA; Tarek H. Zohdy, Cody R. Padgett, Laura E. Goolsby, Capstone Law APC, Los Angeles, CA; Steven Calamusa, Geoffrey Stahl, Rachel Bentley, Gordon & Partners, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, FL for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Patrick M. Brannigan, Jessica L. Reno, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott LLC, Wilmington, DE; Stephen A. D’Aunoy, Thomas L. Azar, Scott H. Morgan, Thompson Coburn LLP, St. Louis, MO for defendant.
Case Number: 21-cv-00906-EJW
Vehicle purchasers' fraud claims against manufacturer failed where their evidence failed to permit an inference that the manufacturer had pre-sale knowledge of an alleged design or manufacturing defect in one of the vehicle's components, and where there was no allegation that the manufacturer knowingly concealed or misrepresented the alleged defect.
Publication Date: 2023-07-03
Practice Area: Consumer Protection
Industry: Federal Government | Health Care
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Peter Bradford deLeeuw, deLeeuw Law LLC, Wilmington, DE; Nicholas A. Migliaccio, Jason Rathod, Tyler J. Bean, Migliaccio & Rathod, LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiff.
for defendant: Aimee M. Czachorowski, Cheneise Wright, Francis G.X. Pileggi, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE; Danielle E. Stierna, Jon P. Kardassakis, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Los Angeles, CA for defendant.
Case Number: 22-317-RGA
Data breach victim had Article III standing by alleging incidents of misuse of her personal identifiable information and alleging that her PII accessed in the data breach was available to cybercriminals.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read