Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
18 results for '* topic:"Dispute Resolution"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2023-01-24
Practice Area: Dispute Resolution
Industry: Energy
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Chancellor LeGrow
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Geoffrey Grivner, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, Wilmington, DE; Gretchen Jankowski, Jordan Webster, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, Pittsburg, PA for plaintiff.
for defendant: John Sensing, Carson Bartlett, Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Wilmington, DE; M. Shane Harvey, Jackson Kelly PLLC, Charleston, WV for defendant.
Case Number: 2022-0039-AML
Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to resolve procedural arbitrability claims where those claims did not implicate the fundamental fairness of the arbitration as the parties' contract expressly gave one side the ability to appoint both arbitrators after the other party had expressly refused to appoint its own arbitrator.
Publication Date: 2022-01-18
Practice Area: Dispute Resolution
Industry: Construction
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Fioravanti
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Patrick M. McGrory, Tighe & Contrell, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Donna L. Culver, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Richard W. Hunt, Ashley H. Buono, Parker Mccay P.A., Mt. Laurel, NJ for defendant.
Case Number: D69680
The court held that the agreement made between the parties clearly called for arbitration.
Publication Date: 2021-10-06
Practice Area: Dispute Resolution
Industry: E-Commerce | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Will
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Rudolf Koch, Ryan D. Konstanzer, Richards, Layton, & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Joseph P. Rockers, Batoul Husain, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Peter B. Ladig, Thad J. Bracegirdle, Justin C. Barrett, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D69559
Where the parties' various agreements adopted different dispute resolution procedures, although each version delegated the issue of arbitrability to the arbitrator, the court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction to determine arbitrability where there was no unmistakable evidence that the parties had agreed to submit one party's claims to that party's chosen arbitral forum.
Publication Date: 2021-04-28
Practice Area: Dispute Resolution
Industry: Real Estate
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Montgomery-Reeves
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael P. Morton, Robert J. Valihura, Jr., David C. Zerbato, Morton, Valihura & Zerbato, LLC, Greenville, DE for petitioner.
for defendant: James P. Sharp, Moore & Rutt, P.A., Georgetown, DE for respondent Weidman. Olga Beskrone, Communi-ty Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., Wilmington, DE for intervenor/respondent Wild Meadows Homeowners’ Ass’n.
Case Number: D69381
An arbitrator in a dispute involving a rent increase for a mobile home community had authority to compel the owner of the community to provide discovery.
Publication Date: 2020-10-21
Practice Area: Dispute Resolution
Industry: Construction | Consumer Products
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard L. Renck, Duane Morris LLP, Wilmington, DE; Wayne A. Mack, J. Manly Parks, William Shotzbarger, Raymond A. Vanderhyden, Duane Morris LLP, Philadelphia, PA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Jason C. Jowers, Stephen B. Brauerman, Elizabeth A. Powers, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Jeffrey H. Wolf, Lauren Elliott Stine, Kristen M. Arredondo, Quarles & Brady LLP, Phoenix, AZ for defendant.
Case Number: D69165
The court denied a party's motion to vacate an arbitrator's award where that party had consented to the arbitrator's authority to issue decisions on certain matters.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2019-04-10
Practice Area: Corporate Entities | Dispute Resolution
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael W. McDermott and David B. Anthony, Berger Harris LLP, Wilmington, DE; Benjamin C. Curcio, Paul F. Campano, Jessica A. Tracy, Michael D. Zahler, and Jason S. Haller Curcio Mirzaian Sirot LLC, Roseland, NJ for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Garrett B. Moritz and Bejamin Z. Grossberg, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andrew E. Anselmi and Zachary D. Wellbrock, McCusker, Anselmi, Rosen & Carvelli, P.C., Florham Park, NJ; Samuel T. Hirzel, II and Aaron M. Nelson, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andrew D. Cordo and F. Troupe Mickler IV, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Jody C. Barillare, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Brian A. Herman, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, New York, NY; Ryan P. Newell and Lauren P. DeLuca, Connolly Gallagher, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Phillip A. Rovner and Jonathan A. Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: D68518
Claims for breach of restrictive covenants were stayed pending arbitration on the issue of arbitrability given the broad scope of the covenants' arbitration clauses, but dismissed where the court lacked jurisdiction over defendants who did not qualify as a "manager" of the domestic LLC.
Publication Date: 2019-02-27
Practice Area: Contracts | Dispute Resolution
Industry: Consumer Products | Distribution and Wholesale
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: James D. Taylor, Jr., Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Wilmington, DE; Robert McHale, McHale Law, Boston, MA for plaintiff.
for defendant: David A. Dorey and Craig N. Haring, Blank Rome LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jason A. Synderman, John Wixted, and Huaou Yan, Blank Rome LLP, Philadelphia, PA for defendants.
Case Number: D68471
Plaintiffs' complaint dismissed in favor of an agreement to arbitrate between the parties, where all of plaintiffs' claims arose from the parties' contract containing an enforceable arbitration clause, which was valid despite naming a non-existent arbitration forum and where defendants had not waived their right to arbitrate before another court.
Publication Date: 2019-01-30
Practice Area: Dispute Resolution | Medical Malpractice
Industry: Health Care
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Johnston
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Leroy A. Tice, Leroy A. Tice, P.A. for plaintiff.
for defendant: Joshua H. Meyeroff, Morris James LLP for defendant.
Case Number: D68439
Joint tortfeasor, allegedly liable under theory of vicarious liability, was not released under settlement between claimant and other joint tortfeasor where neither were explicitly named nor released under settlement.
Publication Date: 2018-11-14
Practice Area: Discovery | Dispute Resolution | Personal Injury
Industry: Construction
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68355
The court severed claims that were covered by an arbitration clause, but it denied a motion to dismiss on the remaining claims because discovery was necessary for the resolution of certain factual issues.
Publication Date: 2018-08-15
Practice Area: Contracts | Dispute Resolution | Securities Litigation
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Fuentes
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68246
Defendants unable to compel arbitration where agreement also included forum selection clause placing exclusive jurisdiction in Delaware courts, and where defendants were not party to or agents of a party to another agreement containing exclusive arbitration clause.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read