Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
181 results for '* topic:"Intellectual Property"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-11-05
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Biotechnology | Legal Services
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian A. Biggs, Stephanie O’Byrne, DLA Piper LLP (US), Wilmington, DE; Michael Sitzman, DLA Piper LLP (US), San Francisco, CA; Susan Krumplitsch, DLA Piper LLP (US), East Palo Alto, CA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Jeremy A. Tigan, Megan E. Dellinger, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Nicholas Groombridge, Eric Alan Stone, Groombridge, Wu, Baughman & Stone LLP, Cold Springs, NY; Jennifer Gordon, Peter Sandel, Tanya S. Manno, Chih-wei Wu, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, NY; Wendy A. Whiteford, J. Drew Diamond, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA for defendant.
Case Number: 21-1807 (MN)
Court denied motion to disqualify plaintiffs' counsel due to its prior representation of defendant's parent company finding a lack of overlap between the present case and counsel's prior representation of the parent company.
Publication Date: 2024-11-05
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Food and Beverage
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Glenn A. Brown, Real World Law, P.C., Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Chad S.C. Stover, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: 20-1170-RGA
Court denied parties' cross-motions for attorneys' fees and costs where each party succeeded on an equal number of claims in the case.
Publication Date: 2024-10-22
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Biotechnology
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Burke
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Rodger D. Smith II, Anthony D. Raucci, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Ching-Lee Fukuda, Tai-Heng Cheng, Vania Wang, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY; Thomas A. Broughan III, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC; Brooke S. Böll, Sidley Austin LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Erik B. Fountain, McKool Smith, P.C., Dallas, TX for plaintiff.
for defendant: Philip A. Rovner, Nicole K. Pedi, Tyler E. Cragg, Andrew M. Moshos, P. Andrew Smith, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Amy H. Candido, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., San Francisco, CA for defendant.
Case Number: 22-276-CJB
Court reserved decision on defendants' summary judgment motion after plaintiff's expert failed to quantify a value for allegedly misappropriated trade secrets.
Publication Date: 2024-03-26
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Hughes
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Tracy L. Pearson, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, Wilmington, DE; Joseph Diamante, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, New York, NY; Raymond Jones, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, Leesburg, VA; William Flachsbart, Mark Magas, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, Chicago, IL for plaintiff.
for defendant: Frederick L. Cottrell, III, Jason James Rawnsley, Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Wilmington, DE; David S. Almeling, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, San Francisco, CA; Timothy S. Durst, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Dallas, TX for defendants.
Case Number: 1:22-cv-01341-TMH
Court declined to dismiss trade secret claims where the parties' contracts could be reasonably interpreted to impose a duty of confidentiality upon defendant to protect plaintiff's disclosed proprietary technology.
Publication Date: 2024-03-04
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Martina Tyreus Hufnal, Douglas E. McCann, Gregory R. Boofer, Fish & Richardson P.C., Wilmington, DE; Philip K. Chen, Fish & Richardson P.C., Boston, MA; Brian Coggio, Excylyn Hardin-Smith, Fish & Richardson P.C., New York, NY; Megan A. Chacon, Madelyn McCormick, Bernard Cryan, Fish & Richardson P.C., San Diego, CA, for plaintiffs.
for defendant: John C. Phillips, Jr., David A. Bilson, Phillips McLaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Michael Nutter, McGuireWoods LLP, Chicago, IL; Corinne S. Hockman, McGuireWoods LLP, Raleigh, NC; Daniel Withers, McGuireWoods LLP, Dallas, TX; Merritt Westcott, McGuireWoods LLP, Houston, TX; Dennis D. Gregory, McGuireWoods LLP, Austin, TX for defendants.
Case Number: 22-434-RGA
Court rejected proposed claim construction for testing method where patent language had failed to establish lexicography or disavowal to require specific test conditions.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2023-10-16
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: E-Commerce | Investments and Investment Advisory | Software
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Comrie Barr Flinn, Alberto E. Chavez, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP, Wilmington, DE; Mark L. D. Wawro, Max L. Tribble, Susman Godfrey, LLP, Houston, TX; Tamar Lusztig, Susman Godfrey, LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Alexandra M. Cumings, Ryan D. Stottmann, William M. Lafferty, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael B. Carlinsky, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY; Kevin P.B. Johnson, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Redwood Shores, CA; Patrick D. Curran, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Boston, MA for defendants.
Case Number: 23-157-CFC
Defendants could remove case under federal officer removal statute by alleging that it had acquired the right to use plaintiff's intellectual property via federal government contracts after the government allegedly obtained "unlimited right" to the intellectual property.
Publication Date: 2023-10-09
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: E-Commerce | Legal Services | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Michael J. Flynn, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Dale M. Cendali, Eric A. Loverro, Joshua L. Simmons, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: David E. Moore, Bindu A. Palapura, Andrew L. Brown Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Gabriel M. Ramsey, Warrington Parker, Joachim B. Steinberg, Jacob Canter, Christopher J. Banks, Shira Liu, Margaux Poueymirou, Anna Z. Saber, Crowell & Moring LLP, San Francisco, CA; Mark A. Klapow, Crinesha B. Berry, Crowell & Moring LLP, Washington, D.C. for defendant.
Case Number: 20-cv-613-SB
Court excluded economic expert's testimony as unsupported by data and methodology where expert claimed there was little likelihood of a market for plaintiffs' product, since there were insufficient facts about the attributes of the product or whether there were current substitutes for the product already on market.
Publication Date: 2023-09-04
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Software
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David L. Finger, Finger & Slanina, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Jimmy C. Chong, Chong Law Firm, PA, Wilmington, DE; Ronald W. Burns, Frisco, Texas for plaintiff.
for defendant: Alan Richard Silverstein, Connolly Gallagher LLP, Wilmington, DE; Mark K. Suri, Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, Chicago, IL; Jeremy Douglas Anderson, Fish & Richardson, P.C., Wilmington, DE; Ricardo J. Bonilla, Fish & Richardson, P.C., Dallas, TX for defendants.
Case Number: 22-572-CFC
Court imposed a civil contempt sanction upon plaintiff's owner for her failure to appear for questioning by the court as ordered, as the court had the inherent authority to impose contempt to enforce its lawful orders.
Publication Date: 2023-05-09
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Carpenter
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gregory P. Williams, Chad M. Shandler, Nicole K. Pedi, Richards, Layton & Finger P.A., Wilmington, DE; Keith R. Hummel, Karin A. DeMasi, Adam I. Rich, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Matthew M. Wolf, John E. Nilsson, Soumitra Deka, Bridgette Boyd, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, DC for defendants.
Case Number: N16C-07-218 WCC CCLD
Statutory disclaimer was effective once patent holder submitted disclaimer form authorizing payment of the filing fee to the patent holder's deposit account with the PTO.
Publication Date: 2022-10-25
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Williams
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Patricia L. Enerio, Aaron M. Nelson, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Daniel J. Herling, Brad M. Scheller, Geri L. Haight, Adrian Kwan, Samuel D. Sazer, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. for plaintiff.
for defendant: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Thomas E. Williams, Kevin C. May, Daniel M. Terhune, Eric Y. Choi, Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP for defendant.
Case Number: 18-1693-GBW
Plaintiff could not defeat summary judgment on its trade secret misappropriation claim based on new allegations that defendant obtained trade secrets from a third party, after the court denied discovery related to the third party and plaintiff never sought to amend its complaint to add allegations relating to the third party.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read