Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
393 results for '* topic:"Mergers and Acquisitions"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-11-12
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ned Weinberger, Mark Richardson, Labaton Sucharow LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jeroen van Kwawegen, Edward G. Timlin, Eric J. Riedel, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Rudolf Koch, Kevin M. Gallagher, Daniel E. Kaprow, John M. O’Toole, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Thomas Uebler, McCollom D’Emilio Smith Uebler LLC, Wilmington, DE; Jason Cyrulnik, Paul Fattaruso, Matthew Henken, Cyrulnik Fattaruso LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case Number: 2017-0486-SG
Court denied plaintiff representative's motion to shift legal fees and costs where the court only awarded nominal damages and thus the stockholder class received no meaningful benefit, and where plaintiff's counsel litigated the case under a contingency arrangement.
Publication Date: 2024-11-12
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: E-Commerce | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Laster
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Elizabeth A. Sloan, Ballard Spahr LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jason C. Spiro, Thomas M. Kenny, Marissa DeAnna, Spiro, Harrison & Nelson, Montclair, NJ for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Geoffrey G. Grivner, Kody M. Sparks, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, Wilmington, DE; Geoffrey G. Grivner, Kody M. Sparks, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, Wilmington, DE; Gavin J. Rooney, Lowenstein Sandler LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case Number: 2021-0346-JTL
Court rejected appraisal and breach of fiduciary duty claims where the record evidence demonstrated that plaintiff common stockholders' equity was worthless at the time of the merger as the company's investor's liquidation and redemption rights exceeded the company's reasonable value.
Publication Date: 2024-11-12
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Will
Attorneys: For plaintiff: William M. Lafferty, Kevin M. Coen, Alex F. Hoeschel, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Peter L. Welsh, Daniel V. Ward, Ropes & Gray LLP, Boston, MA; Nicholas A. S. Hoy, Andrew J. Rossman, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, New York, NY; Joseph Margolies, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, Chicago, IL; Gabriel F. Soledad, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, Washington, D.C. for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Peter J. Walsh, Jr., Aaron R. Sims, Charles R. Hallinan, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; David Boies, Marc Ayala, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Armonk, NY; Carlos M. Sires, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Fort Lauderdale, FL for defendant.
Case Number: 2023-0647-LWW
Defendant breached guarantee agreement by filing suit against a non-party in violation of the release defendant agreed to, triggering the guarantee's termination provision.
Publication Date: 2024-11-05
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Will
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kimberly A. Evans, Lindsey K. Faccenda, Irene R. Lax, Robert Erikson, Block & Leviton LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: S. Michael Sirkin, Benjamin M. Whitney, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: 2023-0873-LWW
Court denied plaintiff's motion to compel production of documents where plaintiff had made an overbroad request for documents, with the court instead allowing defendants to produce documents under technology assisted review.
Publication Date: 2024-10-29
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Williams
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Derrick B. Farrell, Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP, Wilmington, DE; Javier Bleichmar, Evan A. Kubota, Thayne Stoddard, Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Kevin M. Cohen, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Brian M. Burnovski, Matthew Cormack, Chui-Lai Cheung, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case Number: 23-965-GBW
Plaintiffs were not entitled to relief where their earnout shares were subject to forfeiture upon a change in control below a certain per share price, and defendants' gaining majority control upon expiration of the tender offer triggered the forfeiture provision.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-10-29
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Biotechnology
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Chancellor Medinilla
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gary W. Lipkin, Michelle C. Streifthau-Livizos, Saul Ewing LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Adam V. Orlacchio, James G. Gorman III, Blank Rome LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: 2023-1142-VLM
Seller plausibly alleged claim of fraud where a promise to redeem preferred shares paid as consideration necessarily included promising to have the required third-party approvals to allow for the redemption.
Publication Date: 2024-10-22
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sarah E. Delia, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Taylor A. Christensen, John P. DiTomo, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell, LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: N23C-10-199 EMD CCLD
Court dismissed action on summary judgment where plaintiffs' claims fell within the scope of the dispute resolution clause in the parties' asset purchase agreement.
Publication Date: 2024-10-01
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Will
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Matthew D. Perri, Daniel E. Kaprow, Elizabeth J. Freud, Alfred P. Dillione, Rae Ra, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Kevin M. Coen, Jacob M. Perrone, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Bradley J. Bondi, D. Scott Carlton, Traci Zeller, Nicholas J. Griepsma, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, D.C. for defendant.
Case Number: 2024-0186-LWW
Court recalculated conversion ratio following business combination where inclusion of issued shares regardless of the circumstances of issuance was consistent with the anti-dilutive purpose of the conversion.
Publication Date: 2024-10-01
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Food and Beverage | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jared T. Green, Seitz, Van Ogtrop & Green, P.A.; Christine E. Burke, Karpf, Karpf & Cerutti, P.C., Bensalem, PA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Brett M. McCartney, Elizabeth A. Powers, Bayard, P.A.; Sarah T. Andrade, Wilmington, DE; Christoper Patton, Leo Park, Lynn Pinker Hurst & Schwegmann, LLP, Dallas, TX for defendants.
Case Number: N23C-12-229 EMD CCLD
Breach of contract and implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing claims failed where parties chose not to incorporate commercially reasonable efforts clause into earnout provision.
Publication Date: 2024-10-01
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Food and Beverage
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Williams
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas G. Macauley, Macauley LLC, Wilmington, DE; Joel S. Magolnick, John E. Kirkpatrick, Marko & Magolnick, P.A., Miami, FL for plaintiffs.
for defendant: David W. Marston, Jr., Jody C. Barillare, Brian F. Morris, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Troy S. Brown, Su Jin Kim, Margot G. Bloom, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA; Michael J. Ableson, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case Number: 19-cv-00731-GBW
Tortious interference and conspiracy claims failed where there was insufficient evidence that defendant had an ulterior motive to interfere with plaintiff's business relationship.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read