Companies Replace Junior In-House Lawyers with Paralegals
In recent years general counsel have discovered that paralegals can do more than summarize depositions and Bates stamp documents. Smart GCs are using them in place of junior in-house lawyers--at least that's one way to interpret the results of two recent surveys conducted by Altman Weil. According to the legal...
July 11, 2006 at 08:00 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
In recent years general counsel have discovered that paralegals can do more than summarize depositions and Bates stamp documents. Smart GCs are using them in place of junior in-house lawyers–at least that's one way to interpret the results of two recent surveys conducted by Altman Weil.
According to the legal consultancy's 2005 Law Department Management Benchmarks Survey, the ratio of paralegals to attorneys in legal departments has grown over the past four years. In 2002 this ratio was 29 for every 100 attorneys; three years later that number jumped by 6 to 35 for every 100 attorneys. Although that jump may seem small, experts expect it to continue to increase in the coming years.
“More and more, companies are asking themselves whether a paralegal might be able to fill a vacancy as opposed to automatically bringing in a lawyer to fill it,” says James Wilber, principal at Altman Weil. “Companies realize there is not much a properly trained and educated paralegal can't do.”
The driving force behind this shift is cost. According to Altman Weil's 2006 Annual Compensation Survey for Paralegals/Legal Assistants and Managers released June 29, the median salary for paralegals is $50,000, significantly less than the salary of even a junior-level attorney, which is approximately $200,000.
The survey also found the average annual bonus for paralegals is $2,000, with only 62.5 percent of in-house paralegals receiving a bonus. In addition, paralegals who work for legal departments make significantly less than their law firm counterparts, who earn 10.4 percent more in median total cash compensation.
“This shift in hiring more paralegals is just another example of how economic pressures are forcing lawyers to practice in smarter ways,” Wilber says.
Aside from appearing in court to represent a party and giving legal advice, paralegals can complete almost any other legal task, making them increasingly favorable replacements for what typically would be positions designated for in-house counsel.
For legal departments looking to fill such vacancies, especially those with restrictive budgets, Wilber suggests approaching the role of a paralegal with an open mind.
“Legal departments should start with a really broad definition of what a paralegal can do and then narrow it down from there,” he says.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBeyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Step 1 for Successful Negotiators: Believe in Yourself
Deluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250