Stepping Up
New York-based Pfizer Inc. tapped its general counsel, Jeffrey Kindler, to serve as its CEO July 28. Kindler's transition is the most recent example of a handful of GCs who have made the move from the top legal post to the top business position within the past couple of years....
August 13, 2006 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
New York-based Pfizer Inc. tapped its general counsel, Jeffrey Kindler, to serve as its CEO July 28.
Kindler's transition is the most recent example of a handful of GCs who have made the move from the top legal post to the top business position within the past couple of years. This trend is due in part to changes in what boards look for in a business leader as well as the changing mentalities of in-house counsel themselves.
For in-house counsel looking to make such a leap, Julie Goldberg, managing partner of executive recruiting firm Korn/Ferry International's Legal Specialist Group, offers her advice on what skills general counsel can use to their advantage as well as what skills they need to develop.
Q: What made Kindler a good candidate for CEO?
A: You had a board of directors that looked around to see if there was an internal candidate. Certainly over the course of six or seven years, Kindler generated great respect and engendered real credibility and trust among the members of the board. He also already knew a lot about Pfizer and its senior management. Given the kinds of challenges that Pfizer faces today, the general counsel is well situated to understand those challenges and navigate around them.
Q: Why would a GC want to become a CEO?
A: Many lawyers have business envy. As lawyers they are either outside counsel who are brought in and then discharged without ever getting a hold of the real excitement of the business, or they are in-house counsel and never felt like they achieved the level of respect or seniority of the businesspeople. That's changing over the course of the past several years largely because of the regulatory environment, which has hugely elevated in-house counsel's stature.
Also, I think one of the more intangible aspects of being a lawyer, even at the senior level, is that it's harder to define your impact, unless you win some huge litigation. Becoming a CEO allows a GC to step up and show that he or she can really guide a company.
Q: What skills do GCs have that can facilitate such a transition?
A: Risk management is critical. One of the drivers that you will find in any GC that becomes a CEO is a real ability to look across the enterprise and understand where the landmines might be as well as how to navigate around them.
Q: What skills does a GC need to hone to become a CEO?
A: Understanding business operations is important. The more general counsel can understand the business and how it works, the more effective they can be.
Also, not all lawyers are finance people. The degree to which a CEO really understands what a CFO does and really understands the numbers is going to help them be that much more effective. Having a J.D. and an MBA is an advantage because it helps someone understand the finances and the business.
Q: How do general counsel actually make the move to a CEO position?
A: It doesn't always happen by design. Kindler didn't go into Pfizer thinking he was going to replace the CEO there. It really becomes more about who is well equipped and who the best candidate is. The board will look for someone that has a proven track record for navigating risk and leading.
Q: What difficulties does a GC face when trying to make that leap?
A: The biggest difficulty may be in getting comfortable with thinking about the strategy for growth. Lawyers don't have to generally think about strategy for numbers growth. It's never been part of their mandate to grow a business. They have supported a business with whatever needs the business may have, but they never had to interface with Wall Street and the analysts every quarter. It's a very different focus.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBeyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Step 1 for Successful Negotiators: Believe in Yourself
Deluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250