Talent Crisis
America's ability to compete in the global market may turn on the outcome of the immigration debate.
December 31, 2006 at 07:00 PM
8 minute read
Given current demographics and educational trends, it's a lot less likely that the “next Bill Gates” will be born in the U.S. Given our country's decreasing share of the world's population and rapidly improving education around the globe, talented individuals throughout the world have vastly greater opportunities than they did a generation ago.
But such a person could still grow up somewhere else and wish to live and work here. Indeed, the access to venture capital and strong protection of IP in the U.S. provide powerful incentives for talented young men and women to move here. And our companies and economy benefit from these talented individuals. The big question is whether we'll let them in.
For more than 50 years, the U.S. has prospered in part by attracting the best and the brightest in highly skilled fields from abroad. The success of U.S. companies in the IT field has been fueled in part by scientists and engineers who immigrated to the U.S. The ability to attract talent from around the world indisputably creates opportunities for everyone–newcomers and long-time residents alike.
Unfortunately, our nation's current immigration policies impede access to the global talent pool at precisely the time when we are striving to maintain global innovation leadership. Simply put: high-skilled immigration to the U.S. is in crisis. In-house counsel need to become educated about immigration issues and their potential impact on all of our companies' ability to compete.
Consider this–just to get a visa, students from abroad are now required to prove that they do not intend to remain in the U.S. upon receiving their degrees. This is only the first in a gauntlet of disincentives facing highly skilled individuals.?? 1/2 Instead of stapling a work visa to their diplomas and inviting these graduates to help grow our economy, we insist they leave upon completion of their studies.
In addition to barriers facing foreign students, our programs for highly skilled employees are woefully inadequate to meet the needs of U.S. companies. H-1B visas, the most critical professional work visa, run out faster and faster each year. This leaves employers without access to urgently needed professionals. The wait time for many key categories of green cards for highly skilled workers now reaches nearly five years.
Other countries are benefiting from this situation. They are changing their immigration policies to attract students and professionals who would otherwise enter this country's skill supply. Their gains are our opportunities lost.
In the U.S., however, there is now daily anguish at both the business and human levels. In an industry that lives by the wits of its workers, how do you tell brilliant, rising star engineers they are facing a five-year wait for a green card and that they cannot change positions and advance professionally while they wait? And how do you tell their spouses that they cannot work in the meantime, especially when other countries would welcome them both with open arms?
There are, however, several steps the U.S. could take to alleviate this crisis.
First, we should increase the annual limit of 140,000 employment-based immigrant visas (including spouses and children) that was established in 1990 to reflect current economic conditions. Second, we should remove the artificially imposed limit on nonimmigrant worker visas for international students graduating from U.S. universities with baccalaureate and advanced degrees. Finally, we should welcome professionals with advanced degrees in science, technology, engineering and math by providing a direct path to permanent residence in the U.S. instead of consigning them to arbitrary “temporary worker” categories.
As in-house counsel, why should we care about this? The answer is clear. In a broadening variety of industries, future growth opportunities for our clients will turn on their ability to recruit talent in competition with successful companies in other countries. The immigration laws will determine whether we can.
——–
Brad Smith is the senior VP, general counsel and corporate secretary of Microsoft Corp.
Given current demographics and educational trends, it's a lot less likely that the “next Bill Gates” will be born in the U.S. Given our country's decreasing share of the world's population and rapidly improving education around the globe, talented individuals throughout the world have vastly greater opportunities than they did a generation ago.
But such a person could still grow up somewhere else and wish to live and work here. Indeed, the access to venture capital and strong protection of IP in the U.S. provide powerful incentives for talented young men and women to move here. And our companies and economy benefit from these talented individuals. The big question is whether we'll let them in.
For more than 50 years, the U.S. has prospered in part by attracting the best and the brightest in highly skilled fields from abroad. The success of U.S. companies in the IT field has been fueled in part by scientists and engineers who immigrated to the U.S. The ability to attract talent from around the world indisputably creates opportunities for everyone–newcomers and long-time residents alike.
Unfortunately, our nation's current immigration policies impede access to the global talent pool at precisely the time when we are striving to maintain global innovation leadership. Simply put: high-skilled immigration to the U.S. is in crisis. In-house counsel need to become educated about immigration issues and their potential impact on all of our companies' ability to compete.
Consider this–just to get a visa, students from abroad are now required to prove that they do not intend to remain in the U.S. upon receiving their degrees. This is only the first in a gauntlet of disincentives facing highly skilled individuals.?? 1/2 Instead of stapling a work visa to their diplomas and inviting these graduates to help grow our economy, we insist they leave upon completion of their studies.
In addition to barriers facing foreign students, our programs for highly skilled employees are woefully inadequate to meet the needs of U.S. companies. H-1B visas, the most critical professional work visa, run out faster and faster each year. This leaves employers without access to urgently needed professionals. The wait time for many key categories of green cards for highly skilled workers now reaches nearly five years.
Other countries are benefiting from this situation. They are changing their immigration policies to attract students and professionals who would otherwise enter this country's skill supply. Their gains are our opportunities lost.
In the U.S., however, there is now daily anguish at both the business and human levels. In an industry that lives by the wits of its workers, how do you tell brilliant, rising star engineers they are facing a five-year wait for a green card and that they cannot change positions and advance professionally while they wait? And how do you tell their spouses that they cannot work in the meantime, especially when other countries would welcome them both with open arms?
There are, however, several steps the U.S. could take to alleviate this crisis.
First, we should increase the annual limit of 140,000 employment-based immigrant visas (including spouses and children) that was established in 1990 to reflect current economic conditions. Second, we should remove the artificially imposed limit on nonimmigrant worker visas for international students graduating from U.S. universities with baccalaureate and advanced degrees. Finally, we should welcome professionals with advanced degrees in science, technology, engineering and math by providing a direct path to permanent residence in the U.S. instead of consigning them to arbitrary “temporary worker” categories.
As in-house counsel, why should we care about this? The answer is clear. In a broadening variety of industries, future growth opportunities for our clients will turn on their ability to recruit talent in competition with successful companies in other countries. The immigration laws will determine whether we can.
——–
Brad Smith is the senior VP, general counsel and corporate secretary of
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250