Reaching Out to Recruiters
For attorneys looking for an in-house position, there is good news and bad news. The good news is that hiring is up in law departments across the country. The bad news is that competition for the openings is intense. That means job seekers need to cast a wide net to...
March 31, 2007 at 08:00 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
For attorneys looking for an in-house position, there is good news and bad news. The good news is that hiring is up in law departments across the country. The bad news is that competition for the openings is intense. That means job seekers need to cast a wide net to find the right legal department opening.
One sometimes overlooked approach is to contact legal recruiting firms. Most in-house law departments retain a recruiting firm on an exclusive basis to fill openings at the higher levels. While search firms contact attorneys with the requisite qualifications to see if they are interested, they are also open to accepting resumes from candidates they haven't called.
If you decide to reach out to recruiters, don't limit yourself to one recruiting firm. Because corporate searches usually are done on an exclusive basis, one search firm can't offer your resume for a job being handled by a different search firm. Each firm is working for specific companies to fill specific positions and is not a placement firm working to find you a job.
“Reaching out to one search firm isn't enough for those people looking to go in-house,” says Jeffrey Lowe, managing partner of Major Lindsey & Africa's Washington, D.C. office. “You need to find out who handles the in-house searches in your market and reach out to all of them.”
The best way to contact a recruiter is to call and introduce yourself and then submit a resume. The search firm will not distribute the resume without consulting you first. While the search firm may not have an immediate opening suited to you, the contact can pay off down the road.
For example, Major Lindsey & Africa enters the skills and experience of potential candidates who submit resumes into a database that it uses to find matches at the outset of a search.
Lowe says that for a current search for a life sciences company GC, he found 100 matches in the database for attorneys in that field with the required 10-plus years of experience. Then he further screened those candidates to see if they have other qualities the company is seeking.
“There really is no downside for the job seeker to being in the database,” he says. “We might find them eventually anyway, but if they are already in the database, once we get a hit they will be among the first people we call.”
In this competitive job market, Lowe says, it's important to put yourself out there.
“Don't sit back and wait for a call,” he says. “You have to be proactive.”
He also warns against trying to outsmart a recruiter who cold calls you about an opening. Frequently candidates will talk to a recruiter on the phone and then call the company that is seeking to fill the position, thinking that they will be more attractive because they company won't have to pay the recruiter a fee.
But with an exclusive search contract, the company has already paid a fee and must refer the candidate back to the search firm, Lowe says.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBeyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Step 1 for Successful Negotiators: Believe in Yourself
Trending Stories
- 1Deal Watch: Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. Plus, Mixed Messages for 2025 M&A
- 2Bathroom Recording Leads to Lawyer's Disbarment: Disciplinary Roundup
- 3Conn. Supreme Court: Workers' Comp Insurance Cancellations Must Be Unambiguous
- 4To Avoid Conflict, NYAG Hands Probe Into Inmate's Beating Death to Syracuse-Area DA
- 5Scripture-Quoting Employee Sues Company for Supporting LGBTQ Pride
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250