Web Evolution
Office of Exempt Organizations' new Web site takes a stab at engaging lawyers.
March 31, 2007 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
Here is the fundamental question: If there is not a Web site for it, does it exist?
In my world of policy wonk overachievers, the answer seems to be no. Almost nothing happens in the public sphere without an accompanying URL directing you to many pages of text, photos and increasingly, video. A governor announces a new program–a new Web site is the place to go for all the details. A major news story breaks–pictures, text and video are updated hourly on a brand new site. Thanks to wildly popular social networking sites such as MySpace and Facebook, even the intensely personal aspects of life become available to anyone with Web access.
So it is not a surprise when even a rather unexciting government agency such as the IRS creates a new Web site. Still, perhaps muted plaudits are due the agency's office of Exempt Organizations (EO) for stepping outside the safe boundaries of simply converting dishwater dull instruction booklets to HTML or PDF files and calling it an online resource. A bit of originality in the EO office is evident in its new site at www.stayexempt.org, which contains a lot of information for tax-exempt organizations about how they can maintain their exemptions and meet their filing requirements.
First, the domain name itself is descriptive. Too many government Web sites have URLs as intuitively obvious as Anglo Saxon runes: www.irs.gov/def.340*!/qwerty/faq.but.not.so/really. Obviously, somebody in the office gave some thought to how people use their browsers and insisted on a separate home page for the “Stay Exempt” project instead of burying it somewhere in the www.irs.gov site where users would have to click five or six times to find it. That decision alone increases the site's effectiveness.
Second, the site's designers opted to engage the user with a bit of entertainment–a very little bit–as it tries to convey a lot of basic tax information through a series of five modules, each focusing on a different aspect of the tax-exempt sector. Believe it or not, the site contains a bit of animation featuring cartoon characters such as Vernon, a volunteer for a charity. He actually talks to you as he introduces the first module on tax-exempt status. Later, you meet several other characters, including Coach, “a brilliant, straight-talking IRS agent,” who articulates points of law. As you progress through each course you are presented with a few dynamic elements such as a click-and-drag exercise to match up types of organizations with their exemption categories. There is even a (rather clunky) take-off on the Candyland children's board game, called Charitable Organization Land. The graphics are barely a step ahead of the old Atari computer games, and the primitive effects would embarrass a gamer. But the IRS deserves credit for making an effort to engage users.
In addition to the module on exemption, there are four others on unrelated business income, employment issues, Form 990 and required disclosures. Each module is described as a “dynamic” mini-course on the law and takes about half an hour to complete. At nearly each step of each course there is a link taking you directly to the applicable IRS form
or publication.
StayExempt.org will not win any design awards. But, it is useful for non-profit lawyers who want to refresh their recollection of the law and for any charity executive who wants quick and easy access to the basics and downloadable forms. Regardless of your rank in the non-profit, the site will let you print out your own official-looking Certificate
of Completion. I'm thinking of getting mine framed.
——-
Bruce Collins is the corporate vice president and general counsel of C-SPAN.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
Pre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute readPreparing for 2025: Anticipated Policy Changes Affecting U.S. Businesses Under the Trump Administration
Senate Panel Postpones Vote on Reconfirmation of Democrat Crenshaw to SEC
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250