Thompson Offers Support for Libby
Larry Thompson, senior vice president and general counsel of PepsiCo, was one of hundreds who offered support for Scooter Libby in letters to Judge Reggie Walton.
June 07, 2007 at 12:19 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Larry Thompson, senior vice president and general counsel of PepsiCo, was one of hundreds who offered support for Scooter Libby in letters to Judge Reggie Walton. The letters, released by the U.S. District Court in Washington June 5–the same day Judge Walton sentenced Libby to 30 months in prison for his role in the Valerie Plame leak–included pleas for leniency from Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Henry Kissinger and John Bolton.
Thompson, who served as Deputy Attorney General under John Ashcroft from 2001 to 2003, wrote of meeting Libby in deputies' meetings of the National Security Council. He said he was impressed with Libby's “absolute devotion to our country, as well as his “basic honesty and integrity,” and called him a “patriot.”
Of the 198 letters the court released, 174 were in support of Libby. Rumsfeld wrote Libby was “the type of person others can hold up to their children and grandchildren as an example of a truly honorable public servant.” Kissinger wrote that while he does not share all of Libby's “strong views,” Libby always “pursued his objectives with integrity and a sense of responsibility.” Dick Cheney, Libby's former boss, did not send a letter.
In addition to the prison term, Judge Walton imposed a fine of $250,000 and sentenced Libby to two years probation following his imprisonment.
The full text of Thompson's letter to the court follows.
April 30, 2007
Dear Judge Walton:
My name is Larry D. Thompson, and I served as Deputy Attorney General of the United States from 2001 to 2003. It was as Deputy Attorney General when I first met Scooter Libby. Scooter and I sat next to each other in previously assigned seats at numerous Deputies' meetings of the National Security Council.
What impressed me most about Scooter Libby during the time we spent together was his absolute devotion to our country, as well as his basic honesty and integrity. Scooter and I had entered public service at relatively advanced stages in our respective careers. In discussing this fact, Scooter acknowledged the financial sacrifices involved, but would often smile, and, as I remember it, would say something like this is important and “we need to do it.” Like many other similarly situated public servants, I consider Scooter Libby a patriot.
I also became very fond of Scooter. Despite his very busy schedule, he was kind to his colleagues. He was very generous with his time and counsel to me, a Washington newcomer, on how to navigate the labyrinth of relationships one must deal with in Washington in order to be effective. I will always appreciate his warm smile and good counsel.
As a lawyer, while I respect the jury's decision in Scooter's case, I find it completely inconsistent with the person I know, and worked with, during some of the darkest hours in our nation's history. The Scooter Libby I know is a good man who deserves all the consideration Your Honor can give him during this difficult period of his life.
Sincerely,
Larry D. Thompson
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250