Johnson & Johnson Sues American Red Cross Over Classic Emblem
Health care product manufacturer Johnson & Johnson filed suit August 8 against the American Red Cross over use of the red cross emblem on licensed products like first aid kits, nail clippers and toothbrushes. Four licensing partners of the relief organization are also named in the suit. In the suit,...
August 10, 2007 at 10:04 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Health care product manufacturer Johnson & Johnson filed suit August 8 against the American Red Cross over use of the red cross emblem on licensed products like first aid kits, nail clippers and toothbrushes. Four licensing partners of the relief organization are also named in the suit.
In the suit, J. & J. demands the Red Cross stop using the emblem on products sold to the public and for the destruction of the Red Cross' inventory of all of the products in question. J. & J. is also asking for proceeds with interest from sales of the licensed products, punitive damages and attorney fees.
J. & J. charges it first used the red cross design and word trademarks in 1887, before the formation of the American Red Cross. According to the suit, a 1895 agreement with the Red Cross gave J. & J. exclusive rights to the emblem for use as a trademark commercially for “chemical, surgical and pharmaceutical goods.”
In 1900, a Congressional charter awarded the Red Cross right to use the emblem in connection with its humanitarian efforts. In 2004, the Red Cross began to license its name and emblem to be used on first aid and disaster-preparedness products.
According to the lawsuit, “Carrying out a commercial enterprise or business is not and never has been one of the purposes of the American Red Cross.” The Red Cross counters that all the profits it receives from these products are reinvested in humanitarian programs and services.
“For a multibillion dollar drug company to claim that the Red Cross violated a criminal statute that was created to protect the humanitarian mission of the Red Cross–simply so that J. & J. can make more money–is obscene,” said American Red Cross President and CEO Mark W. Everson in a statement. “… I hope that the courts and Congress will not allow Johnson & Johnson to bully the American Red Cross.”
In a statement from J. & J., the company expressed “great respect” for Red Cross relief work and noted it attempted to resolve the matter through “cooperation and discussion” and offered mediation “to no avail.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInternal Whistleblowing Surged Globally in 2024, So Why Were US Numbers Flat?
6 minute readInside Track: AI Is Sure to Fray Big Law's Devotion to Billable Hour
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250