Survey Reveals Uptick In Legal Department Hiring Plans
Hiring in legal departments appears to be on the upswing. A recently released survey of Chief Legal Officers conducted by the Altman Weil legal consultancy and LexisNexis Martindale-Hubble found that nearly 40 percent plan to add additional lawyers within the next 12 months.
August 12, 2007 at 08:00 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Hiring in legal departments appears to be on the upswing. A recently released survey of Chief Legal Officers conducted by the Altman Weil legal consultancy and LexisNexis Martindale-Hubble found that nearly 40 percent plan to add additional lawyers within the next 12 months.
That compares to 36 percent who said they would add attorneys in 2006 and 35 percent who planned to hire in 2005.
“The increase in the number of GCs who say they will add staff positions is not huge, but it is the highest in the past three years,” says Daniel J. DiLucchio Jr., principal in Altman Weil. “It's an interesting indicator that things may be loosening up.”
DiLucchio attributes most of the growing interest in hiring to rising outside counsel costs, which make it economically advantageous to add staff positions to handle more work inside.
The positions to be added differ by industry and size of department, DiLucchio says.
“The smaller the department, the more they are looking for generalists–someone with business sense who can juggle a lot of balls and may not have all the answers but knows where to get the answers,” he says. “Larger companies are looking to bring specialty work, such as labor and employment, inside. Still larger companies are looking for financial or tax expertise.”
On average, CLOs responding to the survey added 1.7 positions to their legal departments over the past three years. Attorneys with specific expertise topped the list of new positions added, with paralegal positions close behind.
“Because of cost pressures, GCs are becoming more aware of the cost benefits of using paralegals,” DiLucchio says. “[The annual Altman Weil benchmarking survey] has found a consistent ratio of three paralegals to 10 lawyers for several years, but we think this is one area where a law department should be above the benchmark level.”
The survey also revealed growing concern among GCs about staff retention and the ability to hire legal talent. When asked, “What is your greatest long-term concern?” comments included “Planning for upcoming retirements and having sufficient budget to hire and allow transition” and “Increasing specialization needed by in-house lawyers and the compensation to effectively compete for such talent.”
But DiLucchio says his conversations with GCs and legal search specialists reveal no problems in finding people to fill in-house openings because many lawyers are still seeking to escape the business development pressure and long hours required in law firm jobs.
Hiring in legal departments appears to be on the upswing. A recently released survey of Chief Legal Officers conducted by the Altman Weil legal consultancy and
That compares to 36 percent who said they would add attorneys in 2006 and 35 percent who planned to hire in 2005.
“The increase in the number of GCs who say they will add staff positions is not huge, but it is the highest in the past three years,” says Daniel J. DiLucchio Jr., principal in Altman Weil. “It's an interesting indicator that things may be loosening up.”
DiLucchio attributes most of the growing interest in hiring to rising outside counsel costs, which make it economically advantageous to add staff positions to handle more work inside.
The positions to be added differ by industry and size of department, DiLucchio says.
“The smaller the department, the more they are looking for generalists–someone with business sense who can juggle a lot of balls and may not have all the answers but knows where to get the answers,” he says. “Larger companies are looking to bring specialty work, such as labor and employment, inside. Still larger companies are looking for financial or tax expertise.”
On average, CLOs responding to the survey added 1.7 positions to their legal departments over the past three years. Attorneys with specific expertise topped the list of new positions added, with paralegal positions close behind.
“Because of cost pressures, GCs are becoming more aware of the cost benefits of using paralegals,” DiLucchio says. “[The annual Altman Weil benchmarking survey] has found a consistent ratio of three paralegals to 10 lawyers for several years, but we think this is one area where a law department should be above the benchmark level.”
The survey also revealed growing concern among GCs about staff retention and the ability to hire legal talent. When asked, “What is your greatest long-term concern?” comments included “Planning for upcoming retirements and having sufficient budget to hire and allow transition” and “Increasing specialization needed by in-house lawyers and the compensation to effectively compete for such talent.”
But DiLucchio says his conversations with GCs and legal search specialists reveal no problems in finding people to fill in-house openings because many lawyers are still seeking to escape the business development pressure and long hours required in law firm jobs.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBeyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Step 1 for Successful Negotiators: Believe in Yourself
Deluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250