The Benefits of Web-based Litigation Tools
As I've stated in this column before, much of my experience as a GC managing litigation stems from large-scale, document-intensive tobacco cases that were often multi-district, large class actions, or other complex cases of extended duration and broad discovery. For these suits, my legal team continually analyzed the best approaches...
August 19, 2007 at 08:00 PM
14 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
As I've stated in this column before, much of my experience as a GC managing litigation stems from large-scale, document-intensive tobacco cases that were often multi-district, large class actions, or other complex cases of extended duration and broad discovery. For these suits, my legal team continually analyzed the best approaches for our litigation support including the technology best suited to provide that support. The needs of the organization, the legal team and the litigation itself are main considerations each time a thorough technology analysis is conducted.
There once was a time when having an internal system to manage all litigation technology needs was the best choice, but those times have gradually shifted. Now with the tremendous influx of data and need for larger litigation support teams, it is not as advantageous to always use an internal system. From my experience, some of the key reasons for choosing an external Web-based hosted litigation support system are listed below.
Service and Prioritization
When using an internal litigation support system, you are relying on your internal IT department for extensive support and service, competing against other departments within the organization. Many organizations have small IT departments, making it difficult for them to properly manage and host massive amounts of data internally. Relying on an application service provider (ASP) or external hosted solution allows your internal IT staff to focus on more pressing technology needs in the organization, and your legal team can depend on an external technology partner who will concentrate solely on the litigation support system requirements. When working with an external litigation support provider, prompt attention is always given to your needs, which means your legal team is able to work more quickly and efficiently as a result. For example, if new data needs to be loaded into your system in order to perform online review for an upcoming production request, your outside provider will load the data immediately whereas you may have to wait for your internal IT personnel to complete another project in order to work on your immediate request.
Considering Security
Many times hosting your own data and allowing external access to outside firms can be a security concern. Most firms managing large-scale litigation support projects, such as case management, choose to provide data access through an external hosting provider. Providers that offer this service will typically hold certain security certifications that ensure that all infrastructure, applications and physical environments are properly secured. Additional layers of firewall protection between the Internet and sensitive hosted data can also be applied by hosted providers, even going as far as isolating individual client networks from other networks. Another security concern can be the physical access to data stored on the hardware. Many providers offer peace of mind in the form of state-of-the-art physical access control to ensure that only authorized personnel have access to the data centers and the sensitive data that resides there.
Customization Capabilities
The majority of litigation application providers are able to customize client systems, either at an additional cost or included in the monthly contract. Since you won't know in the beginning of the litigation what features and capabilities you will need for the life of the case, it is beneficial to have the ability to make adjustments as the litigation progresses. For e-discovery projects, for example, opposing counsel may add additional production requests that weren't required in the beginning of the case, but are imperative at a later stage. Being able to include these new production features or other types of features to your existing online review system enables you to meet the demands of your discovery request and not have to wait for a custom internal tool to be developed.
Phoning for Help
As with a lot of large-scale litigation, the management of the case can be overwhelming for internal legal departments. Having a project manager familiar with the case and litigation support application to assist with the day-to-day concerns relating to technology takes the burden off your legal team. Technical support is also necessary when many users are continuously accessing the same site. If someone encounters a glitch or has a question about the application, they are able to get an answer or solution right away.
Scalable Sizing
Often when a piece of litigation is initially filed, the true size of the case is undetermined. If the suit grows into a significantly larger piece of litigation, it is important to find a hosted solution that can grow with it. A scalable system that can handle the constant addition of large amounts of records and documents and the addition of more law firms and users as the case develops can be extremely beneficial. In addition, as the case evolves, it may require system changes such as database updates and new hardware configurations, which are standard protocol for most application providers and can be done quickly when needed. Look ahead at what the case could be in the future and plan for it with the technology you choose in the beginning.
Quick Implementation
Sizable cases often need attention right away due to immediate meetings and quick deadlines, and installing new technology internally can be cumbersome, especially if a complicated setup and significant customization work is required to make it run smoothly. When setting up an internal system, expertise is frequently needed from both technical application staff and network engineering staff. In this situation, your legal department is waiting on two internal IT departments to set up the litigation support system ,which may take longer, depending on their schedules. A hosted Web-based solution can be up and running quickly, depending on your specific configuration needs, and users only need a secure login and password to access the system.
Factoring Cost
There is potential for considerable cost savings in copying, faxing, shipping, scanning, uploading and courier expenses when all documents and records are uploaded once into one central Web-based system and used by an entire litigation team. In addition, if you are facing repetitive litigation, your legal team benefits greatly from using one Web-based system in order to share attorney work product, such as summaries of previous trial testimonies, previous deposition issues and questions as well as research on old transcripts. Your organization can also save money by not employing internal IT staff to support a large litigation system.
Easy Access
With an external Web-based system, users can collaborate instantly on one set of the most current data, eliminating duplication. Internal and external teams working on a case can access the same information regardless of where they are and the time of day.
When purchasing technology for large-scale litigation, it is important to consider the needs of the organization, your legal team and the litigation itself. External Web-based hosted litigation support systems have benefited my legal teams in many ways. Unlike small scale litigation, my experience in managing large-scale litigation has proven that hosted solutions are dependable for the life of the litigation, allowing my legal team to focus on the litigation itself and not the reliability and functionality of the technology.
———
Charles A. Blixt is a consultant with TCDI, a litigation technology company. He formerly served as executive vice president, general counsel and assistant secretary for Reynolds American Inc. and as interim general counsel for Krispy Kreme Doughnuts.
As I've stated in this column before, much of my experience as a GC managing litigation stems from large-scale, document-intensive tobacco cases that were often multi-district, large class actions, or other complex cases of extended duration and broad discovery. For these suits, my legal team continually analyzed the best approaches for our litigation support including the technology best suited to provide that support. The needs of the organization, the legal team and the litigation itself are main considerations each time a thorough technology analysis is conducted.
There once was a time when having an internal system to manage all litigation technology needs was the best choice, but those times have gradually shifted. Now with the tremendous influx of data and need for larger litigation support teams, it is not as advantageous to always use an internal system. From my experience, some of the key reasons for choosing an external Web-based hosted litigation support system are listed below.
Service and Prioritization
When using an internal litigation support system, you are relying on your internal IT department for extensive support and service, competing against other departments within the organization. Many organizations have small IT departments, making it difficult for them to properly manage and host massive amounts of data internally. Relying on an application service provider (ASP) or external hosted solution allows your internal IT staff to focus on more pressing technology needs in the organization, and your legal team can depend on an external technology partner who will concentrate solely on the litigation support system requirements. When working with an external litigation support provider, prompt attention is always given to your needs, which means your legal team is able to work more quickly and efficiently as a result. For example, if new data needs to be loaded into your system in order to perform online review for an upcoming production request, your outside provider will load the data immediately whereas you may have to wait for your internal IT personnel to complete another project in order to work on your immediate request.
Considering Security
Many times hosting your own data and allowing external access to outside firms can be a security concern. Most firms managing large-scale litigation support projects, such as case management, choose to provide data access through an external hosting provider. Providers that offer this service will typically hold certain security certifications that ensure that all infrastructure, applications and physical environments are properly secured. Additional layers of firewall protection between the Internet and sensitive hosted data can also be applied by hosted providers, even going as far as isolating individual client networks from other networks. Another security concern can be the physical access to data stored on the hardware. Many providers offer peace of mind in the form of state-of-the-art physical access control to ensure that only authorized personnel have access to the data centers and the sensitive data that resides there.
Customization Capabilities
The majority of litigation application providers are able to customize client systems, either at an additional cost or included in the monthly contract. Since you won't know in the beginning of the litigation what features and capabilities you will need for the life of the case, it is beneficial to have the ability to make adjustments as the litigation progresses. For e-discovery projects, for example, opposing counsel may add additional production requests that weren't required in the beginning of the case, but are imperative at a later stage. Being able to include these new production features or other types of features to your existing online review system enables you to meet the demands of your discovery request and not have to wait for a custom internal tool to be developed.
Phoning for Help
As with a lot of large-scale litigation, the management of the case can be overwhelming for internal legal departments. Having a project manager familiar with the case and litigation support application to assist with the day-to-day concerns relating to technology takes the burden off your legal team. Technical support is also necessary when many users are continuously accessing the same site. If someone encounters a glitch or has a question about the application, they are able to get an answer or solution right away.
Scalable Sizing
Often when a piece of litigation is initially filed, the true size of the case is undetermined. If the suit grows into a significantly larger piece of litigation, it is important to find a hosted solution that can grow with it. A scalable system that can handle the constant addition of large amounts of records and documents and the addition of more law firms and users as the case develops can be extremely beneficial. In addition, as the case evolves, it may require system changes such as database updates and new hardware configurations, which are standard protocol for most application providers and can be done quickly when needed. Look ahead at what the case could be in the future and plan for it with the technology you choose in the beginning.
Quick Implementation
Sizable cases often need attention right away due to immediate meetings and quick deadlines, and installing new technology internally can be cumbersome, especially if a complicated setup and significant customization work is required to make it run smoothly. When setting up an internal system, expertise is frequently needed from both technical application staff and network engineering staff. In this situation, your legal department is waiting on two internal IT departments to set up the litigation support system ,which may take longer, depending on their schedules. A hosted Web-based solution can be up and running quickly, depending on your specific configuration needs, and users only need a secure login and password to access the system.
Factoring Cost
There is potential for considerable cost savings in copying, faxing, shipping, scanning, uploading and courier expenses when all documents and records are uploaded once into one central Web-based system and used by an entire litigation team. In addition, if you are facing repetitive litigation, your legal team benefits greatly from using one Web-based system in order to share attorney work product, such as summaries of previous trial testimonies, previous deposition issues and questions as well as research on old transcripts. Your organization can also save money by not employing internal IT staff to support a large litigation system.
Easy Access
With an external Web-based system, users can collaborate instantly on one set of the most current data, eliminating duplication. Internal and external teams working on a case can access the same information regardless of where they are and the time of day.
When purchasing technology for large-scale litigation, it is important to consider the needs of the organization, your legal team and the litigation itself. External Web-based hosted litigation support systems have benefited my legal teams in many ways. Unlike small scale litigation, my experience in managing large-scale litigation has proven that hosted solutions are dependable for the life of the litigation, allowing my legal team to focus on the litigation itself and not the reliability and functionality of the technology.
———
Charles A. Blixt is a consultant with TCDI, a litigation technology company. He formerly served as executive vice president, general counsel and assistant secretary for
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
Contract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readHow Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250