Former GC Now Searches for In-House Candidates
John Davis has been on both sides of the in-house attorney hiring fence. He was general counsel of three different public companies in Dallas--Carreker Corp., a software and consulting company; Dave & Buster's Inc. restaurant chain; and Cameron Ashley Building Products Inc.
September 11, 2007 at 08:00 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
John Davis has been on both sides of the in-house attorney hiring fence. He was general counsel of three different public companies in Dallas–Carreker Corp., a software and consulting company; Dave & Buster's Inc. restaurant chain; and Cameron Ashley Building Products Inc. He also was an in-house counsel for Electronic Data Systems and earlier, a law firm attorney.
In his new role, he recruits lawyers for senior in-house positions as a managing director based in Dallas for legal search firm Major Lindsey & Africa. He draws on his own career experiences both to help companies set expectations for the candidates they consider and to help motivate good candidates to make a career change.
“I understand how business people think and what they are looking for in a lawyer and I understand how candidates think and what they are looking for in a career move,” Davis says.
What the business people are looking for, Davis says, is someone who understands the realities of commerce and will help move the business ahead rather than being a roadblock. Often they focused on finding someone with experience in their industry. They tend to diminish the importance of legal training and technical skills.
“We look for a balance and try to educate clients that good legal training and technical quality is just as important as someone who has experience in your business,” he says. “I've learned from my own career moves that a good lawyer who is a quick study can make a change between industries.”
Candidates for in-house positions almost always think they have good business sense and the capability of being a business facilitator rather than a naysayer, but that's not always the case, Davis says.
“The reality is that there is a spectrum of lawyers –some who can be very good business people and others who are good technicians without a business perspective,” he says. The ideal candidate has both.
Davis offers this advice to in-house attorneys looking to make a career move: “Keep doing a good job at what you are doing. Don't lose sight of what is going on in your company. Have a story to tell about your role in the process. Be able to describe your relationship with the CEO or COO and what you have done to be part of the team.”
And he also advises being flexible about making a move if possible.
“The more open you are to geography, the more opportunities will be open to you,” he says.
John Davis has been on both sides of the in-house attorney hiring fence. He was general counsel of three different public companies in Dallas–Carreker Corp., a software and consulting company; Dave & Buster's Inc. restaurant chain; and Cameron Ashley Building Products Inc. He also was an in-house counsel for Electronic Data Systems and earlier, a law firm attorney.
In his new role, he recruits lawyers for senior in-house positions as a managing director based in Dallas for legal search firm Major Lindsey & Africa. He draws on his own career experiences both to help companies set expectations for the candidates they consider and to help motivate good candidates to make a career change.
“I understand how business people think and what they are looking for in a lawyer and I understand how candidates think and what they are looking for in a career move,” Davis says.
What the business people are looking for, Davis says, is someone who understands the realities of commerce and will help move the business ahead rather than being a roadblock. Often they focused on finding someone with experience in their industry. They tend to diminish the importance of legal training and technical skills.
“We look for a balance and try to educate clients that good legal training and technical quality is just as important as someone who has experience in your business,” he says. “I've learned from my own career moves that a good lawyer who is a quick study can make a change between industries.”
Candidates for in-house positions almost always think they have good business sense and the capability of being a business facilitator rather than a naysayer, but that's not always the case, Davis says.
“The reality is that there is a spectrum of lawyers –some who can be very good business people and others who are good technicians without a business perspective,” he says. The ideal candidate has both.
Davis offers this advice to in-house attorneys looking to make a career move: “Keep doing a good job at what you are doing. Don't lose sight of what is going on in your company. Have a story to tell about your role in the process. Be able to describe your relationship with the CEO or COO and what you have done to be part of the team.”
And he also advises being flexible about making a move if possible.
“The more open you are to geography, the more opportunities will be open to you,” he says.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBeyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Step 1 for Successful Negotiators: Believe in Yourself
Trending Stories
- 1People in the News—Jan. 2, 2025—Eastburn and Gray, Klehr Harrison
- 2Deal Watch: Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. Plus, Mixed Messages for 2025 M&A
- 3Bathroom Recording Leads to Lawyer's Disbarment: Disciplinary Roundup
- 4Conn. Supreme Court: Workers' Comp Insurance Cancellations Must Be Unambiguous
- 5To Avoid Conflict, NYAG Hands Probe Into Inmate's Beating Death to Syracuse-Area DA
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250