Melvyn Weiss Indicted for Role in Kickbacks Scheme
Federal prosecutors indicted Milberg Weiss co-founder Melvyn Weiss Sept 20 for his alleged role in paying millions of dollars in kickbacks to people to serve as named plaintiffs in class actions.
September 21, 2007 at 10:06 AM
9 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Federal prosecutors indicted Milberg Weiss co-founder Melvyn Weiss Sept 20 for his alleged role in paying millions of dollars in kickbacks to people to serve as named plaintiffs in class actions. The scheme allegedly put $250 million in fees into Milberg Weiss' pockets.
According to the indictment, which charges Weiss with several counts of racketeering conspiracy, conspiracy and obstruction, Weiss had “substantial control over the management and conduct of Milberg Weiss's business affairs” and “possessed the authority to veto any proposed action or decision affecting the operation or management of Milberg Weiss.”
The indictment accuses Weiss of telling another partner in August 1979 that he had entered into an arrangement to pay a plaintiff 10 percent of attorneys' fees. Prosecutors also named that plaintiff, Seymour Lazar, in the indictment along with other plaintiffs who received a portion of attorneys' fees to serve as plaintiffs.
In another incident outlined in the indictment, former senior partner David Bershad in the early 1980s told Weiss such a scheme was illegal, and Weiss allegedly allayed his concerns by telling him the payments were being made in cash, there was no paper trail and as such there was “little risk they would ever be caught.”
Also named along with Weiss were previously indicted Milberg Weiss former senior partners William Lerach, who pleaded guilty just days earlier; Bershad, who pleaded guilty in July; and Steve Schulman, who pleaded guilty to a racketeering charge the same day Weiss was indicted. As part of their plea deals, Bershad and Schulman agreed to cooperate with prosecutors. Three unidentified partners are also accused of participating in the scheme, as are lawyers from other firms who allegedly helped facilitate the payments and their concealment.
“Mr. Weiss has decided to discontinue his participation in [Milberg Weiss] management in order to focus on the defense of charges against him,” Milberg Weiss said in a Sept. 19 statement announcing Weiss' indictment. “…We do not anticipate any interruption in our work and we look forward to putting this difficult period behind us.”
Federal prosecutors indicted
According to the indictment, which charges Weiss with several counts of racketeering conspiracy, conspiracy and obstruction, Weiss had “substantial control over the management and conduct of
The indictment accuses Weiss of telling another partner in August 1979 that he had entered into an arrangement to pay a plaintiff 10 percent of attorneys' fees. Prosecutors also named that plaintiff, Seymour Lazar, in the indictment along with other plaintiffs who received a portion of attorneys' fees to serve as plaintiffs.
In another incident outlined in the indictment, former senior partner David Bershad in the early 1980s told Weiss such a scheme was illegal, and Weiss allegedly allayed his concerns by telling him the payments were being made in cash, there was no paper trail and as such there was “little risk they would ever be caught.”
Also named along with Weiss were previously indicted
“Mr. Weiss has decided to discontinue his participation in [
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRepublican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
4 minute readSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
FTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
4 minute readHow Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250