Thank-You Notes Boost Job Seekers' Chances
In these days of instant messages, e-mail and cell phones, communication via letters written in longhand is pretty much a lost art.
October 09, 2007 at 08:00 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
In these days of instant messages, e-mail and cell phones, communication via letters written in longhand is pretty much a lost art.
So it's a bit surprising that a recent survey found that a majority of executives prefer to receive handwritten post-interview thank-you notes, as opposed to e-mail messages, from job candidates they interview.
But the biggest error an applicant can make is not sending any thank-you at all. While only half of applicants send any kind of thank-you, 88 percent of executives said a thank-you note can boost a job seeker's chances of landing the job, according to the survey commissioned by the Accountemps division of Robert Half International. This is just as true for high-level positions in the law department as it is for those at the bottom of the corporate ladder, according to Charles Volkert, executive director of Robert Half Legal, the legal search division.
“Within the corporate environment, among the C-level-type individuals conducting [law department] interviews, a thank-you note is very much appreciated,” Volkert says. “It demonstrates professionalism, initiative and basic courtesy and enhances the chances of the candidate to be hired.”
Volkert recommends sending a quick e-mail thank-you right after the interview, followed by a more formal–though short–handwritten note mailed within 24 hours.
“Don't go overboard,” Volkert adds. “Our feedback from clients is that they like to receive something in the neighborhood of one paragraph.”
Volkert says the letter should express appreciation for the opportunity to interview, reinforce the candidate's interest in the job and restate the value he or she will bring to the organization.
“Beyond that, it gets to be too much,” he says.
If a candidate feels the interview went badly or comes away from the interview realizing the job is not the right fit, he or she should send a note anyway, Volkert says.
“Just because you think it didn't go well doesn't mean the person interviewing you thinks that,” he says. “The thank-you note may tilt the balance in your favor. If you decide you aren't interested in the position, sending a note to the interviewer saying you appreciate their time may pay off down the road when you discover that person is now working at your dream company.”
Following up by telephone may also be appropriate, Volkert says, although never as a substitute for a written thank-you. He recommends asking at the end of the interview what the next steps will be, and asking if the interviewer would like you to follow-up by phone in 48 or 72 hours.
“Set the ground rules as you are closing out the interview,” he says, “and use your best judgment on whether a voice mail message will help.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBeyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Step 1 for Successful Negotiators: Believe in Yourself
Trending Stories
- 1People in the News—Jan. 2, 2025—Eastburn and Gray, Klehr Harrison
- 2Deal Watch: Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. Plus, Mixed Messages for 2025 M&A
- 3Bathroom Recording Leads to Lawyer's Disbarment: Disciplinary Roundup
- 4Conn. Supreme Court: Workers' Comp Insurance Cancellations Must Be Unambiguous
- 5To Avoid Conflict, NYAG Hands Probe Into Inmate's Beating Death to Syracuse-Area DA
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250