NAACP Joins Eli Lilly Discrimination Suit
The NAACP on Nov. 1 joined a federal lawsuit filed last year alleging drug maker Eli Lilly & Co. of racial discrimination.
November 02, 2007 at 09:03 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The NAACP on Nov. 1 joined a federal lawsuit filed last year alleging drug maker Eli Lilly & Co. of racial discrimination. Plaintiffs charge Lilly discriminated against black employees in pay, ratings, promotions and discipline. They say Lilly retaliated against those who complained.
In what the complaint calls “a discouraging trend,” the company would allegedly hire African-Americans, but “they never lasted long with the company and were 'coached' out or encouraged to resign rather than face termination.”
The complaint also describes a “company culture that favors conformity with the majority, white culture.”
“This is a pattern that's going on at the company, and it's a pattern that's got to stop,” plaintiffs' attorney Joshua Rose said at a press conference.
The suit, originally filed in April 2006 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, currently has more than 50 plaintiffs, but according to court documents those plaintiffs believe “well over 1,000 African-American employees of Lilly” have been subjected to racial discrimination.
The plaintiffs are currently seeking class action status to include hundreds of current and former Lilly employees in the suit, Rose said.
The NAACP on Nov. 1 joined a federal lawsuit filed last year alleging drug maker
In what the complaint calls “a discouraging trend,” the company would allegedly hire African-Americans, but “they never lasted long with the company and were 'coached' out or encouraged to resign rather than face termination.”
The complaint also describes a “company culture that favors conformity with the majority, white culture.”
“This is a pattern that's going on at the company, and it's a pattern that's got to stop,” plaintiffs' attorney Joshua Rose said at a press conference.
The suit, originally filed in April 2006 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, currently has more than 50 plaintiffs, but according to court documents those plaintiffs believe “well over 1,000 African-American employees of Lilly” have been subjected to racial discrimination.
The plaintiffs are currently seeking class action status to include hundreds of current and former Lilly employees in the suit, Rose said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
Contract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute read
How Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute read
Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
