Louis Vuitton Wins Suit Over Spears Video
Louis Vuitton won a lawsuit against Sony BMG, a Sony subsidiary and MTV Online over a Britney Spears music video that featured a car upholstered in counterfeit Vuitton-logoed fabric.
November 20, 2007 at 06:21 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Louis Vuitton won a lawsuit against Sony BMG, a Sony subsidiary and MTV Online over a Britney Spears music video that featured a car upholstered in counterfeit Vuitton-logoed fabric.
A Paris civil court on Nov. 16 found Sony BMG, its subsidiary Zomba and MTV Online guilty of violating counterfeiting laws and fined each company 80,000 euros (around $118,000). Sony BMG and Zomba–which own Spears' record label–produced the video, and MTV Online offered the video on its Web site. Spears herself was not held responsible for the clip, which features the singer behind of the wheel of a Hummer with a dashboard upholstered in pink fabric with the “LV” logo.
The judge also restricted Sony BMG, Zomba and MTV Online from “airing and/or marketing the video by any means,” with the threat of a 1,000 euro fine for every day they do not comply. The court emphasized that the ban included Internet-based broadcasting.
The judge ruled that the use of the LV fabric in Spears' music video for “Do Something” infringed “the economic value of [Louis Vuitton's] brand, and notably the image of luxury it promotes and which appears to be far from the image put forth by Britney Spears.”
Louis Vuitton, a division of LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton, has taken to the courts to protect its brand, which is now a common target of counterfeiters.
Days before the Spears victory, Louis Vuitton lost its challenge in U.S. District Court against a dog toy manufacturer that created a handbag-shaped toy labeled “Chewy Vuiton.” In that case, the judge ruled that “as a parody, [the company] separated itself from the [Louis Vuitton] marks in order to make fun of them.”
Louis Vuitton won a lawsuit against Sony BMG, a Sony subsidiary and MTV Online over a Britney Spears music video that featured a car upholstered in counterfeit Vuitton-logoed fabric.
A Paris civil court on Nov. 16 found Sony BMG, its subsidiary Zomba and MTV Online guilty of violating counterfeiting laws and fined each company 80,000 euros (around $118,000). Sony BMG and Zomba–which own Spears' record label–produced the video, and MTV Online offered the video on its Web site. Spears herself was not held responsible for the clip, which features the singer behind of the wheel of a Hummer with a dashboard upholstered in pink fabric with the “LV” logo.
The judge also restricted Sony BMG, Zomba and MTV Online from “airing and/or marketing the video by any means,” with the threat of a 1,000 euro fine for every day they do not comply. The court emphasized that the ban included Internet-based broadcasting.
The judge ruled that the use of the LV fabric in Spears' music video for “Do Something” infringed “the economic value of [Louis Vuitton's] brand, and notably the image of luxury it promotes and which appears to be far from the image put forth by Britney Spears.”
Louis Vuitton, a division of LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton, has taken to the courts to protect its brand, which is now a common target of counterfeiters.
Days before the Spears victory, Louis Vuitton lost its challenge in U.S. District Court against a dog toy manufacturer that created a handbag-shaped toy labeled “Chewy Vuiton.” In that case, the judge ruled that “as a parody, [the company] separated itself from the [Louis Vuitton] marks in order to make fun of them.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250