Client Service in a Consulting Culture
In our quarterly in-house culture profile, Mike interviews a GC with sound advice for succeeding at a fast paced consulting firm.
August 06, 2008 at 08:00 PM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Do you cringe when you have to call an 800 number for “customer service?” Cable companies, online retailers, airlines and thousands of companies from all industry segments rely on call centers to handle every conceivable type of interaction with the general public, and most importantly, paying customers.
Companies like eLoyalty, a publicly traded customer relationship management (CRM) consulting firm, take the phrase “this call may be monitored for quality assurance” to a new level. eLoyalty makes a program called Behavioral Analytics. In a nutshell, this recently launched software evaluates millions of calls and generates qualitative feedback that leads to a better understanding of the customer and provides a basis for evaluating and improving the performance of call center employees. Protecting and licensing this technology is mission critical for eLoyalty, which puts the three attorney legal team front and center.
Steve Shapiro, general counsel for Lake Forest, Il.-based eLoyalty, joined the company in 2006 after serving as the top lawyer for First Midwest Bancorp. Handling deals, contracts and securities matters came naturally to Shapiro. Moving to a Silicon Valley style corporate culture took a little time, but now he is accustomed to Blackberry missives at all hours from his CEO, customers and sales reps throughout the world. The company is a dot-com survivor that has navigated boom and bust cycles leading to an environment that prizes innovation over bureaucracy. So, eLoyalty's attorneys are challenged to find ways to get deals done without compromising the company's intellectual property or violating privacy laws.
To succeed in a consulting environment, attorneys must appreciate the life of the consultants on the ground. He says attorneys at consulting firms need to win the confidence of the consultants by being available, flexible and able to solve problems on the fly. Shapiro suggests this approach may be a shock to the system for attorneys who are accustomed to a lot of policy and process.
To make sure eLoyalty chooses attorneys with the best chance to succeed, the company engages in behavioral interviewing, personality testing and intelligence testing. “We want attorneys who are fully formed,” he says, emphasizing the importance of business maturity.
A great example of this kind of hire is a former partner at Winston & Strawn who was hired as eLoyalty's first chair on privacy issues. Call centers are subject to 50 different state privacy laws and rules in this area continue to evolve in response to new technology. To secure such top of market talent Shapiro embraced eLoyalty's flexibility and met the new hire's request to telecommute two days per week.
A candidate who interviews with eLoyalty will see more than a consultancy that helps its customers change–he or she will find a company that embraces change internally. Leading by example is a general counsel who successfully transitioned from a suit and tie banking culture to a business casual environment where entrepreneurialism is “in,” and banking hours are “out.”
Do you cringe when you have to call an 800 number for “customer service?” Cable companies, online retailers, airlines and thousands of companies from all industry segments rely on call centers to handle every conceivable type of interaction with the general public, and most importantly, paying customers.
Companies like eLoyalty, a publicly traded customer relationship management (CRM) consulting firm, take the phrase “this call may be monitored for quality assurance” to a new level. eLoyalty makes a program called Behavioral Analytics. In a nutshell, this recently launched software evaluates millions of calls and generates qualitative feedback that leads to a better understanding of the customer and provides a basis for evaluating and improving the performance of call center employees. Protecting and licensing this technology is mission critical for eLoyalty, which puts the three attorney legal team front and center.
Steve Shapiro, general counsel for Lake Forest, Il.-based eLoyalty, joined the company in 2006 after serving as the top lawyer for First Midwest Bancorp. Handling deals, contracts and securities matters came naturally to Shapiro. Moving to a Silicon Valley style corporate culture took a little time, but now he is accustomed to Blackberry missives at all hours from his CEO, customers and sales reps throughout the world. The company is a dot-com survivor that has navigated boom and bust cycles leading to an environment that prizes innovation over bureaucracy. So, eLoyalty's attorneys are challenged to find ways to get deals done without compromising the company's intellectual property or violating privacy laws.
To succeed in a consulting environment, attorneys must appreciate the life of the consultants on the ground. He says attorneys at consulting firms need to win the confidence of the consultants by being available, flexible and able to solve problems on the fly. Shapiro suggests this approach may be a shock to the system for attorneys who are accustomed to a lot of policy and process.
To make sure eLoyalty chooses attorneys with the best chance to succeed, the company engages in behavioral interviewing, personality testing and intelligence testing. “We want attorneys who are fully formed,” he says, emphasizing the importance of business maturity.
A great example of this kind of hire is a former partner at
A candidate who interviews with eLoyalty will see more than a consultancy that helps its customers change–he or she will find a company that embraces change internally. Leading by example is a general counsel who successfully transitioned from a suit and tie banking culture to a business casual environment where entrepreneurialism is “in,” and banking hours are “out.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBeyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Step 1 for Successful Negotiators: Believe in Yourself
Deluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250