Beyond Debate
In-house attorney supports program to help urban teens build skills through debate.
January 31, 2009 at 07:00 PM
9 minute read
To read the full cover story about corporate pro bono work, click here.
—
Pro bono service is generally interpreted to mean volunteer work providing legal services to the poor. But many in-house attorneys also help their communities in other ways–serving on boards of non-profit institutions and raising money for such groups.
Bobbie Gregg, chief compliance officer of Aon, for example, serves on the governing board of the Chicago Debate Commission. The commission supports a program that involves Chicago public high school and middle school students in debate as a way to motivate them to stay in school and help them develop skills that will allow them to pursue higher education. An arm of the National Association of Urban Debate Leagues (NAUDL), the Chicago Debate Commission supports two full-time staff members who work with high school and middle school coaches, sponsors policy debate tournaments and funds scholarships to debate camps.
By getting involved in debate, students learn how to research issues, develop arguments and think on their feet–all skills essential to a legal career. Gregg and other attorneys involved in the program hope that long term it will help address the legal profession's diversity issue because most of the urban debaters are minorities
As a result, the Chicago Debate Commission is involving law firms. For example, Mayer Brown hosted a debate tournament in its offices in November, with attorneys serving as judges and presenting a program on legal careers. This two-day event exposed the debaters to law firm life and the lawyers to a potential group of applicants they might not otherwise consider while they are still in high school, Gregg points out.
While it's too early to say how many urban debaters will end up in law school, the NAUDL has documented a very positive impact on their academic performance. According to the NAUDL, youths who have participated in urban debate leagues, on average, increase their literary skills by 25 percent, improve their grades by up to 10 percent and achieve high school graduation rates of nearly 100 percent, compared to a national average of 50 percent for their peers. Seventy percent to 90 percent go on to college.
“It is a heartwarming experience to see that debate really does change the lives of students who become involved,” Gregg says.
Gregg recalls the story of a high school girl who had been in foster care because one of her parents was in prison and the other was addicted to drugs. “She was underperforming [in school] and meeting everyone's expectations that she would amount to nothing.” Gregg says.
Getting involved in debate turned the girl's life around. She became a top student headed to college.
“Sometimes it seems there are very few things you can do where you can see dramatic results,” Gregg says. “This is a way that I can make a real contribution to the lives of individuals. That's why I'm involved.”
To read the full cover story about corporate pro bono work, click here.
—
Pro bono service is generally interpreted to mean volunteer work providing legal services to the poor. But many in-house attorneys also help their communities in other ways–serving on boards of non-profit institutions and raising money for such groups.
Bobbie Gregg, chief compliance officer of Aon, for example, serves on the governing board of the Chicago Debate Commission. The commission supports a program that involves Chicago public high school and middle school students in debate as a way to motivate them to stay in school and help them develop skills that will allow them to pursue higher education. An arm of the National Association of Urban Debate Leagues (NAUDL), the Chicago Debate Commission supports two full-time staff members who work with high school and middle school coaches, sponsors policy debate tournaments and funds scholarships to debate camps.
By getting involved in debate, students learn how to research issues, develop arguments and think on their feet–all skills essential to a legal career. Gregg and other attorneys involved in the program hope that long term it will help address the legal profession's diversity issue because most of the urban debaters are minorities
As a result, the Chicago Debate Commission is involving law firms. For example,
While it's too early to say how many urban debaters will end up in law school, the NAUDL has documented a very positive impact on their academic performance. According to the NAUDL, youths who have participated in urban debate leagues, on average, increase their literary skills by 25 percent, improve their grades by up to 10 percent and achieve high school graduation rates of nearly 100 percent, compared to a national average of 50 percent for their peers. Seventy percent to 90 percent go on to college.
“It is a heartwarming experience to see that debate really does change the lives of students who become involved,” Gregg says.
Gregg recalls the story of a high school girl who had been in foster care because one of her parents was in prison and the other was addicted to drugs. “She was underperforming [in school] and meeting everyone's expectations that she would amount to nothing.” Gregg says.
Getting involved in debate turned the girl's life around. She became a top student headed to college.
“Sometimes it seems there are very few things you can do where you can see dramatic results,” Gregg says. “This is a way that I can make a real contribution to the lives of individuals. That's why I'm involved.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250