Case Study: Diversifying the Microsoft IP Department
Diversifying the Microsoft IP Department.
May 31, 2009 at 08:00 PM
5 minute read
—
Sometimes ensuring a diverse legal department can be downright easy–a little extra effort, like a phone call or scan of a database can go a long way to recruiting a diverse staff. But in some fields, the recruiting base is thin even before you put diversity on the table. The patent group at Microsoft faced this problem as they added to their roster of specialized lawyers, who need a technical degree on top of their J.D.
“The vast majority of people out of law school don't have that, but we're at a company that has lots of people with technical degrees,” says Danielle Johnston Holmes, a senior attorney in the patent group.
So the patent group reached into the reserves. With an eye on having a diverse slate of candidates, about five years ago the group began recruiting from within the Microsoft gates–plucking up developers with computer engineering degrees and other technical specialists and introducing them to the IP department, where they receive training in the field and support through law school.
Dividing and conquering can be a good strategy for a massive company like Microsoft that has lawyers around the globe.
“When in a large department like ours, it's been very important that we've had support from the general counsel,” Johnston Holmes says. “But day-to-day, it's the individual managers who need to support and implement the diversity programs.”
The technical field also presents another challenge for diverse recruitment. In the computer science field, the gender gap is not only wide but also growing. A study by the Computing Research Association showed that 28 percent of computer science undergraduate degrees went to women in 2001-2002. By 2004-2005, the number had fallen to 22 percent.
The IP department offers flex- and part-time schedules to its lawyers, which can be a big draw for women, who–whether we like it or not–still tend to bear more than their share of parenting duties. Johnston Holmes is among the Microsoft attorneys to take advantage of the program and prove that success and value are possible outside a traditional work schedule.
The opportunity, along with the childcare services Microsoft offers, is an important part of retaining and attracting a diverse group of lawyers. “It's certainly been a big factor in why I'm at Microsoft and still so satisfied with my career here,” Johnston Holmes says.
—
Sometimes ensuring a diverse legal department can be downright easy–a little extra effort, like a phone call or scan of a database can go a long way to recruiting a diverse staff. But in some fields, the recruiting base is thin even before you put diversity on the table. The patent group at
“The vast majority of people out of law school don't have that, but we're at a company that has lots of people with technical degrees,” says Danielle Johnston Holmes, a senior attorney in the patent group.
So the patent group reached into the reserves. With an eye on having a diverse slate of candidates, about five years ago the group began recruiting from within the
Dividing and conquering can be a good strategy for a massive company like
“When in a large department like ours, it's been very important that we've had support from the general counsel,” Johnston Holmes says. “But day-to-day, it's the individual managers who need to support and implement the diversity programs.”
The technical field also presents another challenge for diverse recruitment. In the computer science field, the gender gap is not only wide but also growing. A study by the Computing Research Association showed that 28 percent of computer science undergraduate degrees went to women in 2001-2002. By 2004-2005, the number had fallen to 22 percent.
The IP department offers flex- and part-time schedules to its lawyers, which can be a big draw for women, who–whether we like it or not–still tend to bear more than their share of parenting duties. Johnston Holmes is among the
The opportunity, along with the childcare services
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
- 1From 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Rollercoaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
- 2Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: Why Jurors in California Failed to Reach Verdict Over Zantac, Bankruptcy Judge Tables Sanctions Against Beasley Allen Attorney
- 3Jones Day Client Seeks Indemnification for $7.2M Privacy Settlement, Plus Defense Costs
- 4Elections Have Consequences: Some Thoughts on Labor and Employment Law Topics in 2025 and Beyond
- 5Law Firm Associates, Staffers Continue to Put a Premium On Workplace Flexibility, Study Finds
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250