Winning at the Interview
Interviewing is a competitive sport. Mike wants you to finish first.
July 19, 2009 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
We've devoted several columns, including the past three, to networking generally and getting in the door for exciting opportunities. Much of that discussion correctly focuses on helping others, listening and avoiding a self-promotional mindset.
For a formal job interview, you need to switch gears. This is now a competition, pure and simple, and there is no prize for second place. I've placed well over 100 attorneys into inside counsel positions, and along the way, my thoughts on what it takes to win have crystallized.
Most importantly, decide beforehand that you want the job. It's ok if you're not really sure. You can always say “no” if offered the position, but indecisiveness or playing hard-to-get usually leads to a “no” from the employer before you get to make that choice. Interviewers respond well to candidates who express some enthusiasm. So, don't worry about coming across as overeager. A little eagerness beats cautious and unsure.
When asked about your experience, be specific and avoid the bull crap. For example, let's say you are interviewing for a general commercial role, and you get asked if you have experience with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Your interviewee gut tells you the correct answer is “yes.” Certainly, if the interviewer is asking about FCPA, then she is hoping you can offer this expertise. However, don't mistake this as a prerequisite to winning and trap yourself. If you have little-to-no experience with FCPA, the correct answer is “no.” You can and should supplement that answer with a short and sweet follow-up comment along these lines: “I'll get up to speed for you quickly on FCPA, based on (fill in with related compliance experience, or perhaps mention a CLE course you took recently on the topic).”
Saying “no” in this context demonstrates candor. Too many interviewees panic a little and stumble about to avoid saying “no” or, worse, lie with a “yes” and risk getting caught on specific follow-up questions. Interviewers have excellent bull crap radar, and they are not interested in a speech about how your general skills and talent make up for lack of specific experience.
The interviewer has already screened you and your competitors on paper for the requisite core experience for this position, either directly or via their search firm. So the experience-related questions will be at the margins. You are really being judged on how you come across–even if the interviewer herself does not realize this. The winner is almost always the candidate who is most genuine and, to be blunt, likeable.
Likeability is not to be underestimated in winning at the interview. Given candidates with similar credentials, decision-makers will always gravitate to the person they believe will make good and loyal teammates. Be the person who gets along well with others, who is self-confident but not arrogant, and who demonstrates the likelihood of a good culture fit.
How do you do this?
You accomplish likeability with short answers. Long answers psychologically send the death knell message that you will be needy. They also run the risk of boring your audience. If you get one critical take-away from this column, it's to avoid lawyerly speechmaking. You also become likeable in more superficial ways. Excellent posture, eye contact, a smile, self-assuredness (but not cocky) and even humor (but not sarcasm) will help you win. If this kind of demeanor does not come naturally to you, invest in interview training with a good career coach. I can refer you to one if you wish.
Now, here is the main difference between networking and interviewing. In both situations, you want to ask intelligent questions that demonstrate an interest in the other person and her company. In both cases, you want to listen well and hopefully connect on one or more life experience commonalities. In networking, however, it's all about the other person. But in an interview, it's correct and powerful to say things like, “I know I would excel in this position,” and/or “Your opportunity fits ideally with my career goals,” and/or “I would welcome this challenge.” You get the idea. Be sure to highlight your best examples of relevant experience. Get your competitive juices flowing and persuade the interviewer to choose you.
The formula for winning at the interview: 1. Be genuine and avoid speechmaking. 2. Show enthusiasm for the position and make the case that you are the best choice to fill it. 3. Be likeable and, if this does not come naturally, get specific interview training.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBeyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Step 1 for Successful Negotiators: Believe in Yourself
Trending Stories
- 1Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 2'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 3Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 4Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 5Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250