Effective Compliance Depends on Front-Line Managers
Holding local managers accountable for compliance ensures practical and effective policy implementation.
March 31, 2010 at 08:00 PM
3 minute read
Following this year's Super Bowl, CBS aired a new reality program called “Undercover Boss.” The show focuses on company executives secretly going “undercover” to take on various entry-level jobs at their companies. As you would expect, the entertainment value comes mainly from the executives' surprise and realization that what actually happens on the factory floor can be worlds apart from policy decisions made in the boardroom.
The show exposes a reality already familiar to in-house attorneys and compliance personnel: No matter how strong the compliance policies, their ultimate effectiveness depends on front-line managers to apply and enforce them.
Kaplan Higher Education is geographically dispersed. Consequently, we rely on local managers to ensure that corporate policies are well understood and adhered to by all employees. We're very aware that this 'hub-and-spoke' system can break down easily; therefore, we take steps to make certain that managers everywhere embrace and effectively implement our compliance policies. Some of these steps include:
- Creating a Culture of Compliance. The importance of the “tone at the top” can't be overstated when it comes to corporate compliance. Kaplan executives and senior managers make a point of repeatedly emphasizing that we must hold ourselves to the highest ethical standards and comply with all applicable laws, regulations, rules and policies. This mantra reinforces the importance of compliance throughout the organization. However, words alone are not enough. Senior managers and above must demonstrate the proper ethical tone by fully engaging in the compliance program and staying apprised of any potential compliance issues.
- “Operationalizing” Compliance. Compliance programs and policy implementation cannot be solely top-down exercises. “Operationalizing” compliance means seeking initial buy-in from business managers on new policies and procedures. At Kaplan, we develop policies in collaboration with the teams that are responsible for their implementation. Giving early and significant voice to the managers in this process ensures that the personnel charged with implementing those policies have a true ownership stake in the results.
- Demanding Accountability. Compli-ance is reinforced when managers are held accountable for their teams' compliance record. However, compliance programs need to balance this need for accountability with the possibility that too heavy a hand may encourage managers to bury or “fix” issues without properly reporting them. Kaplan addresses this balance by giving all employees the tools to immediately report any potential violation (see “InsidePerspectives,” August 2008).
- Educating and Reinforcing. Ensuring that policies are well understood is the most effective route to successful implementation. Kaplan employs a combination of new-hire training, in-person training for managers and their direct reports, and web-based reinforcement training. We also provide managers and their employees with easy to follow “Codes of Conduct” in some of the more critical compliance areas.
While a robust compliance program may start at the top, it is ultimately implemented at the bottom. Enabling local managers to take ownership of their teams' compliance helps ensure that policies are correctly applied throughout your organization. And, best of all, you won't have to put on a disguise and take an entry-level job to find out what is really happening in your company.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Trending Stories
- 1The Pusillanimous Press
- 2Contract Lifecycle Management Company ContractPodAi Unveils Leah Drive
- 3'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
- 4Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 5Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250