Law Departments Purge for Change
Law department recruiters have a direct, if anecdotal insight into the effects of a down economy.
April 30, 2010 at 08:00 PM
3 minute read
“Every opening we get, the client says they're running lean,” says Aaron Williams, president of Aaron Consulting Inc., a national search firm.
Law department recruiters have a direct, if anecdotal insight into the effects of a down economy. Williams, who has been in the business for 30 years, has seen the pattern before.
“Every time there's a down cycle we go through the same thing,” he says. “Law departments try to come up with new strategies, the law firms try to partner up on those strategies, and ultimately both parties end up doing the same thing: They purge for change. They evaluate the talent they have and try to make adjustments to maximize the dollars they spend.”
Painful as it may be, economic upheaval is healthy for law departments and lawyers alike, Williams says.
“These cycles are good for all companies,” he says. “It's a motivator for making change that you should be making anyway.”
The recession looks to be heading into its next phase. Law department recruiters report a significant uptick in job openings in recent months and say searches that were on hold are now moving forward. That means opportunity for in-house counsel looking to make a move, but others may get the boot.
“GCs in a time of crisis are probably the last person you want to switch out,” says Catherine Nathan, a member of the search firm Spencer Stuart. “Now that some of the crises have past, CEOs are really looking at their senior teams again and in some instances are ready to make changes.”
“Every opening we get, the client says they're running lean,” says Aaron Williams, president of Aaron Consulting Inc., a national search firm.
Law department recruiters have a direct, if anecdotal insight into the effects of a down economy. Williams, who has been in the business for 30 years, has seen the pattern before.
“Every time there's a down cycle we go through the same thing,” he says. “Law departments try to come up with new strategies, the law firms try to partner up on those strategies, and ultimately both parties end up doing the same thing: They purge for change. They evaluate the talent they have and try to make adjustments to maximize the dollars they spend.”
Painful as it may be, economic upheaval is healthy for law departments and lawyers alike, Williams says.
“These cycles are good for all companies,” he says. “It's a motivator for making change that you should be making anyway.”
The recession looks to be heading into its next phase. Law department recruiters report a significant uptick in job openings in recent months and say searches that were on hold are now moving forward. That means opportunity for in-house counsel looking to make a move, but others may get the boot.
“GCs in a time of crisis are probably the last person you want to switch out,” says Catherine Nathan, a member of the search firm Spencer Stuart. “Now that some of the crises have past, CEOs are really looking at their senior teams again and in some instances are ready to make changes.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDeluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
4 minute readBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
Trending Stories
- 1The Pusillanimous Press
- 2Contract Lifecycle Management Company ContractPodAi Unveils Leah Drive
- 3'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
- 4Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 5Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250