Litigation: BP Should Expect an Onslaught of Suits
As of now, 74 cases have been filed in federal courts, 38 of which were filed by the U.S. District Court of New Orleans.
May 18, 2010 at 08:00 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
In the coming years–possibly decades–BP is sure to encounter an onslaught of lawsuits. Cases can be made for contractual, wrongful death and injury, environmental and commercial losses. There are thousands of potential plaintiffs confronted with different levels of economic harm. The oil spill also occurred in an area that is much more populated and economically active than Alaska, the site of the infamous Exxon Valdez spill.
As of now, 74 cases have been filed in federal courts, 38 of which were filed by the U.S. District Court of New Orleans. Several of these are wrongful death suits; others aim for class action certification. More will certainly arise as the spill hasn't actually finished spilling.
“You have petroleum products being released into a marine habitat, and there is no end in sight at this point in terms of the release,” John G. Nevius, an environmental and insurance attorney in New York with Anderson, Kill & Olick, told The Times-Picayune. Leakage totaled 261,904 barrels, as of Wednesday. The oil is expected to be halted by July. On July 29, a panel of federal judges will meet in Boise, Idaho, to decide if all the lawsuits filed at that point should be consolidated into one large case in New Orleans, as most people harmed by the spill want, or in Houston, as BP has requested.
BP is responsible for cleanup costs in accordance with the Oil Pollution Act. It may seek contributions from others who may have contributed to the disaster, such as its corporate drilling partners. “The Oil Pollution Act established a $75 million cap on damages for economic losses, but it may be irrelevant, if the company in question has engaged in willful neglect, gross misconduct or violations of safety rules,” Nathan Richardson, an attorney and visiting scholar at the Resources for the Future Foundation, told The Times-Picayune.
To learn more see: http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-14/127399141295480.xml&coll=1&thispage=2
In the coming years–possibly decades–BP is sure to encounter an onslaught of lawsuits. Cases can be made for contractual, wrongful death and injury, environmental and commercial losses. There are thousands of potential plaintiffs confronted with different levels of economic harm. The oil spill also occurred in an area that is much more populated and economically active than Alaska, the site of the infamous Exxon Valdez spill.
As of now, 74 cases have been filed in federal courts, 38 of which were filed by the U.S. District Court of New Orleans. Several of these are wrongful death suits; others aim for class action certification. More will certainly arise as the spill hasn't actually finished spilling.
“You have petroleum products being released into a marine habitat, and there is no end in sight at this point in terms of the release,” John G. Nevius, an environmental and insurance attorney in
BP is responsible for cleanup costs in accordance with the Oil Pollution Act. It may seek contributions from others who may have contributed to the disaster, such as its corporate drilling partners. “The Oil Pollution Act established a $75 million cap on damages for economic losses, but it may be irrelevant, if the company in question has engaged in willful neglect, gross misconduct or violations of safety rules,” Nathan Richardson, an attorney and visiting scholar at the Resources for the Future Foundation, told The Times-Picayune.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250