Morrison on Metrics: Differences in Legal Department Pay
Study shows comparative benchmark metrics on salaries between countries.
June 20, 2010 at 08:00 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Metrics on lawyer compensation are important as guides to whether in-house lawyers are appropriately paid in terms of market prices. Those same metrics also give us insights into comparative benchmark metrics between countries. Let me offer an example or two of the spillover.
The latest global survey of compensation by the executive search firm Laurence Simons provides data on in-house lawyer compensation for 18 countries as well as two regions (North America and Middle East). Based on pay data from more than 1,900 inside lawyers, we can see differences of pay by level across countries.
For example, in the U.K., lawyers who are 12-13 years post qualification (roughly 14 years out of law school as an equivalent to U.S. lawyers) reported a median salary of $159,120 (EUR110,500 at $1.44 U.S. to the Euro); those at 16-20 years post qualification increased to $188,640 (EUR131,000). In Germany, the comparable figures were $151,200 (EUR105,000) and $208,800 (EUR145,000). Fairly close, the two countries are, with the average of the figures in each country favoring German lawyers by about 4 percent.
Across the Atlantic, the North American figures were $220,700 and $300,000–a whopping 45 percent higher than the German average.
We should not take these figures, aggregated and calculated, as precise, but it seems safe to say that lawyers in legal departments in the U.S., which probably make up nearly all of the North American region, cost much more than their counterparts with comparable experience in U.K. and German law departments.
Now, bear in mind that of total legal costs, those incurred by the inside legal department on its own expenditures (that is, excluding amounts paid external counsel and vendors) typically account for about 40 percent of the total. Of that portion, something like 75 percent goes to salaries, bonuses and benefits of all the members of the department, both lawyers and non-lawyers. The difference discussed above pertains only to salaries, but still they are significantly higher.
Thus, if we look at companies with the same revenue and their total legal spending as a percentage of that revenue, lawyer salaries bulk much larger on the western side of the Atlantic than on the eastern side. All things being equal, the spend-to-revenue ratio here should be higher than there, and indeed in the General Counsel Metrics global survey, the U.S. has the higher ratio, by about 25 percent. One might predict from the cost disparity something else: There will be fewer lawyers per billion dollars of revenue in the U.S. than in the U.K. and Germany. Sure enough, U.S. law departments have somewhat fewer lawyers than U.K. law departments and significantly fewer than the law departments in Germany. All things being equal, internal costs per lawyer would reflect both of these findings and would be higher in the U.S. They do and are.
In short, when you marry metrics about in-house lawyer compensation to metrics about total legal costs and ratios, differences between at least these countries show consistent patterns that make sense.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhite Castle GC Becomes Chain's First President From Outside Family
Beyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250