Regulatory: Regulation of Communications Under the Obama Administration
FCC's efforts to provide broadband to all Americans is a significant regulatory policy.
July 06, 2010 at 08:00 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
In March, the Federal Communications Commission released the National Broadband Plan, which proposed how broadband deployment should be pursued to bring high-speed Internet access to all Americans. The FCC's efforts to implement the plan are one of the most significant regulatory policies developed by the Obama Administration.
The Plan addressed a series of challenging questions, including:
- Where do we have broadband where is it missing?;
- Is it our national policy to make broadband available everywhere?;
- How would we do that (e.g., by expanding the Universal Service program to encompass broadband)?,
- What laws/regulations/requirements ought to govern broadband?;
- What are key national policies to be accomplished with ubiquitous broadband (enhancing national security, public safety, telemedicine, education)?.
One major challenge will be to determine how demands for wireless broadband communications should be accommodated in anticipation of a 30-fold increase in mobile traffic. On June 28, the President issued a Memorandum, “Unleashing the Wireless Broadband Revolution,” which directs the heads of all government agencies to cooperate with the FCC in identifying and repurposing for mobile broadband up to 500 megahertz of spectrum now reserved for commercial and governmental uses.
The Plan also recommended construction of a nationwide, 100 percent interoperable, broadband wireless public safety network for first responders, to be built by local agencies pursuant to federal design and performance criteria. Up to $15 billion in federal funding over a decade may be necessary to help build the network.
The FCC is also actively considering how it might assert jurisdiction over the Internet. On June 17, the commission released a Notice of Inquiry seeking comments on its authority to regulate broadband Internet access. In particular, it sought comment on its “Third Way” approach, which would reclassify the transmission aspect of broadband Internet access from its current status as an unregulated information service and transform it into a telecommunications service subject to common-carrier regulation. The Third Way seeks to work around the decision in Comcast Corp. v. FCC, 600 F.3d 642 (D.C. Cir. 2010). That decision cast into doubt the statutory authority for the FCC's Net Neutrality initiative, which would impose broad fairness obligations on broadband providers to prevent possible exercise of market power at the expense of consumers.
All Americans have a vital interest in the outcome of the Administration's efforts to shape the future structure of this critical sector of the economy.
John F. Cooney is a partner in the Washington, D.C., office of Venable.
Read John Cooney's previous column. Read John Cooney's next column.
In March, the Federal Communications Commission released the National Broadband Plan, which proposed how broadband deployment should be pursued to bring high-speed Internet access to all Americans. The FCC's efforts to implement the plan are one of the most significant regulatory policies developed by the Obama Administration.
The Plan addressed a series of challenging questions, including:
- Where do we have broadband where is it missing?;
- Is it our national policy to make broadband available everywhere?;
- How would we do that (e.g., by expanding the Universal Service program to encompass broadband)?,
- What laws/regulations/requirements ought to govern broadband?;
- What are key national policies to be accomplished with ubiquitous broadband (enhancing national security, public safety, telemedicine, education)?.
One major challenge will be to determine how demands for wireless broadband communications should be accommodated in anticipation of a 30-fold increase in mobile traffic. On June 28, the President issued a Memorandum, “Unleashing the Wireless Broadband Revolution,” which directs the heads of all government agencies to cooperate with the FCC in identifying and repurposing for mobile broadband up to 500 megahertz of spectrum now reserved for commercial and governmental uses.
The Plan also recommended construction of a nationwide, 100 percent interoperable, broadband wireless public safety network for first responders, to be built by local agencies pursuant to federal design and performance criteria. Up to $15 billion in federal funding over a decade may be necessary to help build the network.
The FCC is also actively considering how it might assert jurisdiction over the Internet. On June 17, the commission released a Notice of Inquiry seeking comments on its authority to regulate broadband Internet access. In particular, it sought comment on its “Third Way” approach, which would reclassify the transmission aspect of broadband Internet access from its current status as an unregulated information service and transform it into a telecommunications service subject to common-carrier regulation. The Third Way seeks to work around the decision in
All Americans have a vital interest in the outcome of the Administration's efforts to shape the future structure of this critical sector of the economy.
John F. Cooney is a partner in the Washington, D.C., office of
Read John Cooney's previous column. Read John Cooney's next column.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Seemingly Simple Off-Channel Communication Rules Still Vex Finance Industry
5 minute readSEC Enforcement Chief Grewal—Whose Hard Line on Crypto Tormented the Industry—Stepping Down
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250