Regulatory: Regulation of Communications Under the Obama Administration
FCC's efforts to provide broadband to all Americans is a significant regulatory policy.
July 06, 2010 at 08:00 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
In March, the Federal Communications Commission released the National Broadband Plan, which proposed how broadband deployment should be pursued to bring high-speed Internet access to all Americans. The FCC's efforts to implement the plan are one of the most significant regulatory policies developed by the Obama Administration.
The Plan addressed a series of challenging questions, including:
- Where do we have broadband where is it missing?;
- Is it our national policy to make broadband available everywhere?;
- How would we do that (e.g., by expanding the Universal Service program to encompass broadband)?,
- What laws/regulations/requirements ought to govern broadband?;
- What are key national policies to be accomplished with ubiquitous broadband (enhancing national security, public safety, telemedicine, education)?.
One major challenge will be to determine how demands for wireless broadband communications should be accommodated in anticipation of a 30-fold increase in mobile traffic. On June 28, the President issued a Memorandum, “Unleashing the Wireless Broadband Revolution,” which directs the heads of all government agencies to cooperate with the FCC in identifying and repurposing for mobile broadband up to 500 megahertz of spectrum now reserved for commercial and governmental uses.
The Plan also recommended construction of a nationwide, 100 percent interoperable, broadband wireless public safety network for first responders, to be built by local agencies pursuant to federal design and performance criteria. Up to $15 billion in federal funding over a decade may be necessary to help build the network.
The FCC is also actively considering how it might assert jurisdiction over the Internet. On June 17, the commission released a Notice of Inquiry seeking comments on its authority to regulate broadband Internet access. In particular, it sought comment on its “Third Way” approach, which would reclassify the transmission aspect of broadband Internet access from its current status as an unregulated information service and transform it into a telecommunications service subject to common-carrier regulation. The Third Way seeks to work around the decision in Comcast Corp. v. FCC, 600 F.3d 642 (D.C. Cir. 2010). That decision cast into doubt the statutory authority for the FCC's Net Neutrality initiative, which would impose broad fairness obligations on broadband providers to prevent possible exercise of market power at the expense of consumers.
All Americans have a vital interest in the outcome of the Administration's efforts to shape the future structure of this critical sector of the economy.
John F. Cooney is a partner in the Washington, D.C., office of Venable.
Read John Cooney's previous column. Read John Cooney's next column.
In March, the Federal Communications Commission released the National Broadband Plan, which proposed how broadband deployment should be pursued to bring high-speed Internet access to all Americans. The FCC's efforts to implement the plan are one of the most significant regulatory policies developed by the Obama Administration.
The Plan addressed a series of challenging questions, including:
- Where do we have broadband where is it missing?;
- Is it our national policy to make broadband available everywhere?;
- How would we do that (e.g., by expanding the Universal Service program to encompass broadband)?,
- What laws/regulations/requirements ought to govern broadband?;
- What are key national policies to be accomplished with ubiquitous broadband (enhancing national security, public safety, telemedicine, education)?.
One major challenge will be to determine how demands for wireless broadband communications should be accommodated in anticipation of a 30-fold increase in mobile traffic. On June 28, the President issued a Memorandum, “Unleashing the Wireless Broadband Revolution,” which directs the heads of all government agencies to cooperate with the FCC in identifying and repurposing for mobile broadband up to 500 megahertz of spectrum now reserved for commercial and governmental uses.
The Plan also recommended construction of a nationwide, 100 percent interoperable, broadband wireless public safety network for first responders, to be built by local agencies pursuant to federal design and performance criteria. Up to $15 billion in federal funding over a decade may be necessary to help build the network.
The FCC is also actively considering how it might assert jurisdiction over the Internet. On June 17, the commission released a Notice of Inquiry seeking comments on its authority to regulate broadband Internet access. In particular, it sought comment on its “Third Way” approach, which would reclassify the transmission aspect of broadband Internet access from its current status as an unregulated information service and transform it into a telecommunications service subject to common-carrier regulation. The Third Way seeks to work around the decision in
All Americans have a vital interest in the outcome of the Administration's efforts to shape the future structure of this critical sector of the economy.
John F. Cooney is a partner in the Washington, D.C., office of
Read John Cooney's previous column. Read John Cooney's next column.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Groups Sue IRS Over Decentralized Finance Reporting Rule
SEC Penalizes Wells Fargo, LPL Financial $900,000 Each for Inaccurate Trading Data
US Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
Pre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250