Regulatory: Green Procurement--More Than Just Buying "Green Stuff"
New contractor requirements for tracking and reporting green house gas emissions.
October 05, 2010 at 08:00 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
On October 5, 2009, President Obama signed Executive Order 13514, entitled, “Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance.” The executive order calls for an integrated strategy for sustainability in the federal government and to make the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission a priority for Federal agencies.
Among the directives included in the order is a measure directing the General Services Administration (GSA) to study and make recommendations to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regarding the feasibility of making GHG emission tracking and reporting part of Federal procurement process. The order calls for GSA to explore the feasibility of (1) requiring venders and contractors to register with a “voluntary registry or organization for reporting GHG emission; (2) requiring contractors to develop and make available via a reporting systems their GHG inventory and description of efforts to mitigate GHG emissions; and (3) using federal government purchasing preferences or other incentives for products manufactured using processes that minimize GHG emissions.
In April 2010, GSA issued its report to OMB. Entitled “Executive Order 13514 Section 13: Recommendations for Vendor and Contractor Emissions,” the report concludes that it is feasible for the government to develop mechanisms to track supply chain emissions through a contractor reporting system and eventually use that data in making procurement decisions. The report recommends a two-phased approach to implementing a tracking, reporting and evaluation regime. Phase 1 (Fiscal Years (FY) 2011-2012) would include the development of an infrastructure for the reporting requirements, including the establishment of a Program Office and the development of the government reporting system. Phase 1 also would entail a training program for government procurement officials. Phase 2 ( FY 2013-2016) would entail, among other things, the development of new policies and procedures for the Federal Acquisition Regulation addressing the government's use of vendor/contractor GHG emissions in making contract award decisions. During this phase it is anticipated that the government will begin using vendor GHG emission data in award decisions.
Although GSA's phased approach stretches out over five years, it is never too early for industry to become involved. One theme running throughout GSA's report is the need for the government to be flexible as tracking and reporting GHG emissions is an emerging field. The new Program Office will be looking for input from the public when developing the reporting system and crafting the rules. Industry can play a vital role in educating and informing government as to best practices and ensuring a balanced approach. Other stakeholders will be providing input to the government. Additionally, once implemented, a contractor who has followed the development of the GHG regime will have a better understanding of the tracking and reporting requirements. An informed contractor will be in a better position to comply with the reporting requirements and may gain a competitive edge.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBest Practices for Adopting and Adapting to AI: Mitigating Risk in Light of Increasing Regulatory and Shareholder Scrutiny
7 minute readCrypto Groups Sue IRS Over Decentralized Finance Reporting Rule
SEC Penalizes Wells Fargo, LPL Financial $900,000 Each for Inaccurate Trading Data
US Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
Trending Stories
- 1The Importance of Contractual Language in Analyzing Post-Closing Earnout Disputes
- 2People in the News—Jan. 8, 2025—Stevens & Lee, Ogletree Deakins
- 3How I Made Partner: 'Avoid Getting Stuck in a Moment,' Says Federico Cuadra Del Carmen of Baker McKenzie
- 4Legal Departments Dinged for Acquiescing to Rate Hikes That 'Defy Gravity'
- 5Spalding Jurors Return $12M Verdict Against State Farm Insurance Client
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250