Develop Your Personal Brand
General counsel such as Rich Baer and Jeff Carr demonstrate the value of participating in "extra-curricular" work.
December 08, 2010 at 07:00 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Think back to school for a moment. Good grades and high SAT scores mattered most when getting into the college of your choice, but extra-curricular activities helped. Moreover, some of your best memories probably come from theater, sports, band, dance, etc. Similarly, moot court, law review and pro bono field work in law school can make a very positive impact in terms of building confidence and credentials. None of those time consuming responsibilities were actually required to graduate or practice law.
Most inside counsel are high achievers who made the time to build dynamic resumes and become well-rounded people in school and usually beyond. Yet, only a small percentage of inside counsel invest time in what I term extra-curricular work. This includes, specifically, speaking at legal conferences, writing articles and contributing to professional discussions online.
I understand the reason cited for such apathy. As grown adults with families, time is more precious than ever and, in a “doing more with less” corporate culture, you have less time to spare. But if you are an inside counsel who does not engage in extra-curricular work, I ask you to be honest with yourself and consider another reason why you avoid it. With respect to extra-curricular activities in school, students can choose among options that include significant components of fun. Many of you simply don't put professional speaking or networking into the fun column. When you do attend a function, it's usually because you can use the continuing legal education credits. Few of you believe that such activity will actually help you do your job better.
All of this misses the point of extra-curricular work. The reason to engage in this activity is to create a personal brand for yourself outside the confines of your place of employment. I'll bet that you know the names Rich Baer (GC of Qwest) and Jeff Carr (GC of FMC). That's because Baer and Carr speak regularly at legal conferences and write about best practices for their general counsel peers. They have created outstanding personal brands. If you attended last month's “Generals of the Revolution” event in Chicago, then you know that Baer created a dynamic presentation that easily became the memorable take away moment of the conference. And Carr was doing missionary style speaking on value billing long before the acronym AFA (alternative fee agreements) went mainstream.
You don't need to be a conference rock star, or even a general counsel, to build a personal brand. By personal brand, I simply mean creating a sense of recognition among peers and employers within your industry or relevant geography. If you are wondering why it might be helpful to gain professional recognition, then you have either never looked for a new job or your ambitions have peaked.
Nonetheless, I think I'll have little success pushing you into another career “to do” activity if your heart is not really in it. So, I encourage you to start by searching for an extra-curricular work opportunity that will include a component of fun for you. If you enjoy writing, consider starting a blog within your subject matter expertise. Post the blog or otherwise contribute to discussion content at sites such as Legal OnRamp, LinkedIn, or Martindale-Hubbell Connected. Better yet, contact the editors at trade publications such as this one, and offer to contribute a short article about an experience that other inside counsel will find interesting.
With respect to legal conferences, I offer one tip for increasing the fun element. Persuade a friend to attend with you. Although this could be a co-worker, think about friends from law school and colleagues from prior employers. This can add a nice social element to the event and even provide a fun back-to-school feeling during conference sessions. Start by finding fun in the conference experience, and then you can work on upgrading to a participatory panel speaking role.
Bottom-line: It's definitely in your best interest to get off the bench and make some time for extra-curricular contributions to the inside counsel community.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
- 1Monmouth Couty Bench May Soon Have a New Superior Court Judge
- 2Fate of Ethics Panel—and Cuomo Book Deal Probe—Is in Top Court's Hands as January Arguments Approach
- 3How a Second Trump Presidency Could Shape IP
- 4Pa. Firms Set to Finish Year Strong, Thanks to Demand Uptick, Shorter Collections Cycle
- 5It's Not About You: Lessons of the Mock Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250