The Six Biggest Mistakes to Avoid When Giving Presentations
Good presentations can propel your career
April 24, 2011 at 08:00 PM
8 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
I spend the better part of my week listening to and giving presentations. Great presentations move people, make them want to listen and engage with the speaker. Poor presentations are a waste of the audience's time.
What should be avoided in a presentation?
Too Much Text, Too Little Information
Chances are pretty good that your audience can read faster than you can speak. But nevertheless, many presenters feel the need to write their slides in bulleted, verbose and complete sentences– often as a crutch in case they forget what to say. The audience has usually read the entire list before the presenter has finished reading the first bullet. Good slides are chock full of information, including text, graphs, illustrations– whatever it takes to best communicate. If you are still worried about forgetting what to say, create your own speaker's notes.
Mixing a Presentation Slide Deck with a Informational Slide Deck
Many presenters justify an overly wordy slide deck by claiming it will be understandable by those not attending the presentation. I think there are two types of slide decks. A presentation slide deck is to support a speaker. An informational slide deck as an easy-to-read document that stands alone without the support of a speaker. These are different media. It's okay to use a presentation deck when presenting, and then later supply an informational deck.
Slides Aren't Your Story
Litigators know that people understand and respond to facts better when they're presented as a story. The same is true of corporate presentations. Every good presentation has at its heart a story and should address three questions: 1) What is the problem and why should we care? 2) How do we fix the problem? 3) What will happen when we do? Even the driest subject matter can be woven into a story that will resonate with the audience. I present on records management and litigation readiness, topics some might see as dry. Yet even these topics can be made to tell a compelling story. Sometimes it's better to think like a screenwriter than an attorney. Tell a story.
Lance Armstrong wrote “It's Not About the Bike” about his cycling career. For speakers, it's not about the slides. Slides only support the story and the speaker. Unfortunately, most presenters take the opposite approach, collecting a series of slides and having these form the narrative, with the presenter becoming simply a voiceover to the slideshow. Audiences are more likely to listen and respond to a speaker, and slides should simply be tools to enhance the speech. Outline your narrative first, then create your slides.
The More Senior the Audience, the Fewer the Slides
I believe the more senior the audience, the fewer slides you should use. Senior executives want to understand the issues and your recommendations quickly. Some, when presenting to senior management, want to justify their recommendations with more data and detail in slides. Keep the main presentation short, and then, if you're still worried, create a “backup slide” section of containing the extra slides with the additional data, citations, etc. More doesn't always mean better–some of my most effective presentations have been ten minutes long.
Chartjunk
Some presenters feel compelled to add small cartoons, pictures or icons to every slide, believing it will be more interesting for the audience. Visual communication research Edward Tufte coined a term for this: Chartjunk. Chartjunk looks pretty but adds little to the information being presented. Chartjunk is usually an indication that the presenter does not have enough useful information to present, and feels he or she needs to “entertain” the audience with something else. Resist using Chartjunk, and instead add real information. Your audience will enjoy it more.
Failure Spend Enough Time to Prepare and Practice
Winston Churchill, perhaps one of the most accomplished orators of the last century, would spend 40 hours preparing and practicing for a one-hour presentation. Good content and delivery take a lot of time and a lot of practice. I have found that the more experienced I have become as a speaker, the more time I spend preparing. It's worth it. A good presentation will not only win over your audience, but may propel your career.
I spend the better part of my week listening to and giving presentations. Great presentations move people, make them want to listen and engage with the speaker. Poor presentations are a waste of the audience's time.
What should be avoided in a presentation?
Too Much Text, Too Little Information
Chances are pretty good that your audience can read faster than you can speak. But nevertheless, many presenters feel the need to write their slides in bulleted, verbose and complete sentences– often as a crutch in case they forget what to say. The audience has usually read the entire list before the presenter has finished reading the first bullet. Good slides are chock full of information, including text, graphs, illustrations– whatever it takes to best communicate. If you are still worried about forgetting what to say, create your own speaker's notes.
Mixing a Presentation Slide Deck with a Informational Slide Deck
Many presenters justify an overly wordy slide deck by claiming it will be understandable by those not attending the presentation. I think there are two types of slide decks. A presentation slide deck is to support a speaker. An informational slide deck as an easy-to-read document that stands alone without the support of a speaker. These are different media. It's okay to use a presentation deck when presenting, and then later supply an informational deck.
Slides Aren't Your Story
Litigators know that people understand and respond to facts better when they're presented as a story. The same is true of corporate presentations. Every good presentation has at its heart a story and should address three questions: 1) What is the problem and why should we care? 2) How do we fix the problem? 3) What will happen when we do? Even the driest subject matter can be woven into a story that will resonate with the audience. I present on records management and litigation readiness, topics some might see as dry. Yet even these topics can be made to tell a compelling story. Sometimes it's better to think like a screenwriter than an attorney. Tell a story.
Lance Armstrong wrote “It's Not About the Bike” about his cycling career. For speakers, it's not about the slides. Slides only support the story and the speaker. Unfortunately, most presenters take the opposite approach, collecting a series of slides and having these form the narrative, with the presenter becoming simply a voiceover to the slideshow. Audiences are more likely to listen and respond to a speaker, and slides should simply be tools to enhance the speech. Outline your narrative first, then create your slides.
The More Senior the Audience, the Fewer the Slides
I believe the more senior the audience, the fewer slides you should use. Senior executives want to understand the issues and your recommendations quickly. Some, when presenting to senior management, want to justify their recommendations with more data and detail in slides. Keep the main presentation short, and then, if you're still worried, create a “backup slide” section of containing the extra slides with the additional data, citations, etc. More doesn't always mean better–some of my most effective presentations have been ten minutes long.
Chartjunk
Some presenters feel compelled to add small cartoons, pictures or icons to every slide, believing it will be more interesting for the audience. Visual communication research Edward Tufte coined a term for this: Chartjunk. Chartjunk looks pretty but adds little to the information being presented. Chartjunk is usually an indication that the presenter does not have enough useful information to present, and feels he or she needs to “entertain” the audience with something else. Resist using Chartjunk, and instead add real information. Your audience will enjoy it more.
Failure Spend Enough Time to Prepare and Practice
Winston Churchill, perhaps one of the most accomplished orators of the last century, would spend 40 hours preparing and practicing for a one-hour presentation. Good content and delivery take a lot of time and a lot of practice. I have found that the more experienced I have become as a speaker, the more time I spend preparing. It's worth it. A good presentation will not only win over your audience, but may propel your career.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
Companies' Obsession With Soft Skills Has Made Prized GC Posts Even Harder to Land
4 minute readMeta Workers Aren't of One Mind on Company's Retreat From DEI, Fact-Checking
Private Equity-Backed Medical Imaging Chain Hires CLO, Continuing C-Suite Makeover
Trending Stories
- 1DeepSeek Isn’t Yet Impacting Legal Tech Development. But That Could Soon Change.
- 2'Landmark' New York Commission Set to Study Overburdened, Under-Resourced Family Courts
- 3Wave of Commercial Real Estate Refinance Could Drown Property Owners
- 4Redeveloping Real Estate After Natural Disasters: Challenges, Strategies and Opportunities
- 5Calif. Fires Should Serve as a Reminder to Fla.’s Commercial Landlords and Tenants Not to Be Complacent
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250