Regulatory: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Definitional interlude - What's in; what's not.
May 17, 2011 at 08:00 PM
12 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
This column is the second in a series of articles on the coming of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the direction it is likely to take in the regulation of consumer financial products and services.
We know that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is a big, new, powerful federal agency that is set to open its doors in just a few short months. But what subject matter will the bureau cover? And who falls within its sphere of power? To get to the bottom of this, we need to spend a little time examining some of the critical definitions in Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act.
Before we do that, however, it may be helpful (and a relief to some) to set forth what types of entities Congress saw fit to exclude from the bureau's powers and the coverage of Title X. Title X specifically excludes from the bureau's coverage:
- Merchants, retailers, and other sellers of nonfinancial goods or services;
- Real estate brokerage activities;
- Manufactured home retailers and modular home retailers;
- Accountant and tax preparers;
- Legal practitioners;
- Employee benefit and compensation plans;
- Persons regulated by the SEC, the CFTC, a state securities commission, a state insurance regulator, or the Farm Credit Administration;
- Motor vehicle dealers, unless they provide mortgages or extend consumer retail credit without assigning it to third parties; and
- Tax-exempt organizations.
To put all of this another way, if you do not fall within one of these exempt categories, then you need to know that the bureau will have expansive authority to adopt and enforce new regulations that will apply to “covered persons” offering any “consumer financial product or service.” What do these terms mean?
A covered person is “any person that engages in offering or providing a consumer financial product or service” and “any affiliate of [such person] if such affiliate acts as a service provider to such person.” A consumer financial product or service, in turn, is very broadly defined to include, among a variety of other things:
- Extending credit and servicing loans;
- Extending or brokering leases of personal or real property that are the functional equivalent of purchase finance arrangements (subject to certain requirements);
- Providing real estate settlement services (subject to certain exceptions);
- Engaging in deposit-taking activities, transmitting or exchanging funds, or otherwise acting as a custodian of funds or any financial instrument for use by or on behalf of a customer;
- Selling, providing, or issuing stored value or payment instruments (subject to certain exceptions);
- Providing check cashing, check collection, or check guaranty services;
- Providing payments or other financial data processing products or services to a consumer by any technological means, or through any payments systems or network used for processing payments data (subject to certain exceptions);
- Providing financial advisory services to consumers to consumers on individual financial matters or relating to proprietary financial products or services (subject to significant exceptions);
- Collecting, analyzing, maintaining, or providing consumer report information or other account information used or expected to be used in connection with any decision regarding the offering or provision of a consumer financial product or service (subject to certain exceptions); and
- Collecting debt related to any consumer financial product or service.
To put all of this another way, if you are dealing in consumer credit in any meaningful way and not otherwise expressly excluded, you are likely to find yourself in the bureau's purview in July. But what does that mean?
It means that the bureau will have complete rulemaking authority over the alphabet soup of consumer financial laws that govern much of your behavior as a covered person. These are the so-called “enumerated consumer laws” and include the following statutes:
- Alternative Mortgage Transaction Parity Act
- Consumer Leasing Act
- Electronic Fund Transfer Act (with certain exceptions)
- Equal Credit Opportunity Act
- Fair Credit Billing Act
- Fair Credit Reporting Act (with certain exceptions)
- Home Owners Protection Act
- Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
- Federal Deposit Insurance Act (only section 43(b)-(f))
- Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (only section 502 through 509, except section 505 as it applies to section 501(b))
- Home Mortgage Disclosure Act
- Hoe Ownership and Equity Protection Act
- Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
- S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008
- Truth in Lending Act
- Truth in Savings Act
- Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2009 (only section 626)
- Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act
These statutes were around long-before Dodd-Frank, of course, but were enforced and had rules adopted in their name by a variety of different federal regulators. Come July, this will be the province of the bureau.
Interestingly, the bureau has the power to pass regulations to exempt from coverage under Title X any class of covered persons or any consumer financial product or service. In making an exemption, the bureau has to take into account the total assets of the class of covered persons, the volume of transactions involving consumer financial products or services in which the class of covered persons engages, and existing laws applicable to the product or service and the extent to which such provisions provide consumers with adequate protections. We will have to wait and see how this power is exercised, if at all.
In coming articles, we will explore some of the bureau's other significant powers, Title X's preemption provisions, and the big new gap filler: UDAAP.
Martin J. Bishop is a partner and vice chair of the Consumer Financial Services Litigation Practice at Foley & Lardner LLP. He can be reached at [email protected].
Read Martin Bishop's previous column.
This column is the second in a series of articles on the coming of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the direction it is likely to take in the regulation of consumer financial products and services.
We know that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is a big, new, powerful federal agency that is set to open its doors in just a few short months. But what subject matter will the bureau cover? And who falls within its sphere of power? To get to the bottom of this, we need to spend a little time examining some of the critical definitions in Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act.
Before we do that, however, it may be helpful (and a relief to some) to set forth what types of entities Congress saw fit to exclude from the bureau's powers and the coverage of Title X. Title X specifically excludes from the bureau's coverage:
- Merchants, retailers, and other sellers of nonfinancial goods or services;
- Real estate brokerage activities;
- Manufactured home retailers and modular home retailers;
- Accountant and tax preparers;
- Legal practitioners;
- Employee benefit and compensation plans;
- Persons regulated by the SEC, the CFTC, a state securities commission, a state insurance regulator, or the Farm Credit Administration;
- Motor vehicle dealers, unless they provide mortgages or extend consumer retail credit without assigning it to third parties; and
- Tax-exempt organizations.
To put all of this another way, if you do not fall within one of these exempt categories, then you need to know that the bureau will have expansive authority to adopt and enforce new regulations that will apply to “covered persons” offering any “consumer financial product or service.” What do these terms mean?
A covered person is “any person that engages in offering or providing a consumer financial product or service” and “any affiliate of [such person] if such affiliate acts as a service provider to such person.” A consumer financial product or service, in turn, is very broadly defined to include, among a variety of other things:
- Extending credit and servicing loans;
- Extending or brokering leases of personal or real property that are the functional equivalent of purchase finance arrangements (subject to certain requirements);
- Providing real estate settlement services (subject to certain exceptions);
- Engaging in deposit-taking activities, transmitting or exchanging funds, or otherwise acting as a custodian of funds or any financial instrument for use by or on behalf of a customer;
- Selling, providing, or issuing stored value or payment instruments (subject to certain exceptions);
- Providing check cashing, check collection, or check guaranty services;
- Providing payments or other financial data processing products or services to a consumer by any technological means, or through any payments systems or network used for processing payments data (subject to certain exceptions);
- Providing financial advisory services to consumers to consumers on individual financial matters or relating to proprietary financial products or services (subject to significant exceptions);
- Collecting, analyzing, maintaining, or providing consumer report information or other account information used or expected to be used in connection with any decision regarding the offering or provision of a consumer financial product or service (subject to certain exceptions); and
- Collecting debt related to any consumer financial product or service.
To put all of this another way, if you are dealing in consumer credit in any meaningful way and not otherwise expressly excluded, you are likely to find yourself in the bureau's purview in July. But what does that mean?
It means that the bureau will have complete rulemaking authority over the alphabet soup of consumer financial laws that govern much of your behavior as a covered person. These are the so-called “enumerated consumer laws” and include the following statutes:
- Alternative Mortgage Transaction Parity Act
- Consumer Leasing Act
- Electronic Fund Transfer Act (with certain exceptions)
- Equal Credit Opportunity Act
- Fair Credit Billing Act
- Fair Credit Reporting Act (with certain exceptions)
- Home Owners Protection Act
- Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
- Federal Deposit Insurance Act (only section 43(b)-(f))
- Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (only section 502 through 509, except section 505 as it applies to section 501(b))
- Home Mortgage Disclosure Act
- Hoe Ownership and Equity Protection Act
- Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
- S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008
- Truth in Lending Act
- Truth in Savings Act
- Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2009 (only section 626)
- Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act
These statutes were around long-before Dodd-Frank, of course, but were enforced and had rules adopted in their name by a variety of different federal regulators. Come July, this will be the province of the bureau.
Interestingly, the bureau has the power to pass regulations to exempt from coverage under Title X any class of covered persons or any consumer financial product or service. In making an exemption, the bureau has to take into account the total assets of the class of covered persons, the volume of transactions involving consumer financial products or services in which the class of covered persons engages, and existing laws applicable to the product or service and the extent to which such provisions provide consumers with adequate protections. We will have to wait and see how this power is exercised, if at all.
In coming articles, we will explore some of the bureau's other significant powers, Title X's preemption provisions, and the big new gap filler: UDAAP.
Martin J. Bishop is a partner and vice chair of the Consumer Financial Services Litigation Practice at
Read Martin Bishop's previous column.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInternal Whistleblowing Surged Globally in 2024, So Why Were US Numbers Flat?
6 minute readFTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Supreme Court Reinstates Corporate Disclosure Law Pending Challenge
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250