Regulatory: The curious case of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) will come into existence on July 21. It likely will not be able to exercise any of the new powers that Congress granted it in the Dodd-Frank Act.
June 15, 2011 at 11:33 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) will come into existence on July 21. It likely will not be able to exercise any of the new powers that Congress granted it in the Dodd-Frank Act. This anomalous situation arose from a combination of the administration's indecision and effective partisan opposition by Republican senators. Consideration of the possible steps to resolve this impasse revolves around the president's constitutional authority to make recess appointments and the ability of a Senate minority to counteract his power.
Congress created the CFPB to address its frustration with the failure of the bank supervisory agencies to use their rulemaking and enforcement authorities more aggressively to protect consumers. In the Dodd-Frank law, Congress stripped the existing powers from the banking agencies and centralized them in a specialized agency whose only function would be consumer financial protection. Congress simultaneously granted the CFPB significant new powers to respond to abuses that had occurred during the real estate bubble, including enforcement authority modeled on the Federal Trade Commission's program. Under Dodd-Frank, in case the office of director is vacant on July 21, the existing statutory powers being transferred to the CFPB from other agencies can be exercised by the secretary of the treasury. However, the new powers granted by that statute, including the crucial responsibilities to issue consumer protection regulations and to take enforcement actions against those who violate the law, cannot be exercised until the first director of the agency takes office. Accordingly, until the current vacancy is filled, the new Dodd-Frank authorities are essentially a dead letter.
President Obama has never appointed a director, to avoid a Senate confirmation battle over the nomination of Elizabeth Warren, whose work inspired the CFPB's creation. Instead, the president named Professor Warren as a White House adviser, in charge of setting up the new agency and choosing its staff. This interim solution worked for several months. As time has passed, however, the president's unwillingness to resolve the issue has jeopardized the consumer protection initiative and could now have negative effects on the entire federal financial regulatory program, depending upon how he acts next.
The president originally had three options: nominate Professor Warren and risk a filibuster against her confirmation; nominate someone acceptable to conservative Republicans; or exercise his constitutional authority to make an “intrasession” recess appointment of Professor Warren during one of the scheduled short-term adjournments of the Senate. He failed to act in time. Republican senators ultimately recognized that the president's inaction offered an opportunity to undermine the CFPB. Using a technique pioneered by the democratic minority to frustrate George W. Bush's ability to make recess appointments, the Republicans have blocked the Senate from adjourning and insisted that the body stay in session, to meet in pro forma session for two minutes per day during scheduled recesses.
Now, an intrasession recess appointment of Professor Warren while the Senate is in pro forma session would precipitate constitutional litigation whose outcome is uncertain and that would cast a cloud over the CFPB's use of its new authorities. A confrontation strategy also would cause the Senate minority to express its displeasure by attacking the CFPB's initiatives, withholding appropriations from the administration, and blocking the confirmation of other non-controversial nominees to fill the many existing high-level vacancies in the other financial regulatory agencies. The damage has already been done. Whatever path the president now chooses, the CFPB will be relatively ineffective through the 2012 elections, just as its opponents would prefer.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Seemingly Simple Off-Channel Communication Rules Still Vex Finance Industry
5 minute readSEC Enforcement Chief Grewal—Whose Hard Line on Crypto Tormented the Industry—Stepping Down
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250