Records and e-discovery processes can improve data security
Legal departments can play an important role in data security.
July 11, 2011 at 01:09 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Every day it seems as though I read about another company that has suffered a data security breach. From Sony having its PlayStation network hacked to Citibank's Visa cards being compromised to the release of files purportedly stolen from AT&T, Corporate America's information infrastructure is under attack. There may be an important role for the legal department in helping to defeat these threats.
Data security faces a fundamental challenge: How do organizations provide employees, customers and other legitimate stakeholders access to data while, at the same time, limiting access to the “bad guys” and other non-legitimate users? Problems arise when companies do not know what type of data they have, have not defined what security and access is appropriate and where data resides. This is where the legal department's records management and e-discovery processes can play an important role.
Record Retention Schedules – Many companies are updating their record retention schedules to not only include what types of records they have and how long they should save them, but also to include the level of security and privacy each type of document should be afforded. Updating a record retention schedule is an excellent opportunity to review document security. Data security classification is an important step to locking down data, and many organizations already have a useful record retention framework to conduct this classification.
e-Discovery Processes – Data security suffers when companies do not know what documents they have where and data breaches often occur as a result of the wrong documents being stored in the wrong place. Legal has faced a similar problem, needing to identify where and which documents contain relevant information during litigation. The same in-house e-processes companies have developed for e-discovery may and should also be leveraged for data privacy. Many legal departments are already pretty good at this. Data often leaks to where it should not be, and legal departments often already have a framework in place to find and control it.
Data Deletion – I have often mentioned in this column the importance of effective and defensible data deletion as part of a record retention program. Many records and documents containing sensitive information have little business value beyond a short period of time, and should be deleted early and often. Effective data deletion is not just for records anymore.
Although not part of its traditional role, the legal department has an important role to play in data security.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250