Inside Experts: How to lose a client in one minute
A few simple words are all it takes to sour a deal.
July 29, 2011 at 05:16 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
As general counsel for an Internet company, I handle many legal issues. I often rely on outside counsel to take on certain tasks and assist me with legal questions. When interviewing outside counsel, I take into account qualifications, communication skills, quality of work and, most importantly, an understanding of my client's business. But I'm also looking for a firm that believes in the big picture, not only for my client, but for our relationship.
My company had a few (what I considered) basic legal questions, and I decided it was time to branch out from our usual firms. We consulted with a few attorneys hoping to research one specific issue and start a long-term relationship.
Based on a recommendation, I set a meeting with one firm. The introductory call went well. The attorney seemed qualified to advise on the subject matter, able to understand my client's legal and business needs and communicated with me in a professional manner. In this 20-minute call, the attorney had met all of my requirements for an outside counsel. Just as I was about to hang up the phone, the attorney asked where to send the bill.
I was taken aback. We never discussed rates or a fee agreement. In fact, in my tenure as in house counsel, I had never been billed for an initial consultation. I gave the attorney my e-mail address.
The attorney immediately e-mailed me a follow up. The attorney thanked me for the opportunity to speak with me and said the bill was on its way. I wrote back that in the past, I've contacted many attorneys in an effort to find the best fit for my company's situation. I told the attorney that this is the first time I was expected to pay fees, not previously disclosed, at the conclusion of an initial call. However, I would pay for services rendered.
I hoped that the attorney would reconsider the bill and that I would be able to reconsider my soured impression. I hoped the bill would never come. But about a month later it did. And my company paid it.
For 20 minutes, I was impressed with the attorney with whom I spoke. My company and I were excited about the prospect of starting a new long-term relationship with a law firm that comprehended our goal. In one minute, however, all of that was thrown away. The attorney's short-sighted view of legal fees and, in turn, how to generate business, proved to me that I had to continue my legal search. We are currently working with another firm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech
7 minute readLegal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025
Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250